Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3076#issuecomment-61564976
/cc @chenglian
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3081#issuecomment-61565165
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3070#discussion_r19773840
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Vectors.scala
---
@@ -75,6 +80,73 @@ sealed trait Vector extends Serializable {
}
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3070#discussion_r19773847
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -460,6 +527,13 @@ def _parse_datatype_json_string(json_string):
...
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3070#discussion_r19773846
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -408,6 +408,73 @@ def fromJson(cls, json):
return StructType([StructField.fromJson(f) for f in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3079#issuecomment-61565401
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3079#issuecomment-61565392
[Test build #22828 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22828/consoleFull)
for PR 3079 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2676#discussion_r19773894
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -641,6 +641,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3009#discussion_r19773955
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/AllJobsPage.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2676#discussion_r19773950
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -661,7 +662,10 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3077#issuecomment-61565726
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3077#issuecomment-61565719
[Test build #22825 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22825/consoleFull)
for PR 3077 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3009#discussion_r19774251
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobPage.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user mmalohlava commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2691#issuecomment-61567145
Sorry for delayed answer. I was trying to provide better solution without
modifying Spark.
However, regarding Sean's question:
* In our case we need to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3068#issuecomment-61567252
[Test build #22832 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22832/consoleFull)
for PR 3068 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3009#issuecomment-61567337
@JoshRosen this looks great!! One thing that seems missing here is some
kind of status bar on the jobs page. I know there was a bunch of debate on
what an
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3077#issuecomment-61567570
This is great! LGTM. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3045#issuecomment-61567648
LGTM - thanks @ksakellis and @sryza.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61567627
[Test build #22826 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22826/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61567632
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3045
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2851#issuecomment-61569172
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2851#issuecomment-61569165
[Test build #22829 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22829/consoleFull)
for PR 2851 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61569440
[Test build #22827 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22827/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61569447
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3078#issuecomment-61569973
[Test build #509 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/509/consoleFull)
for PR 3078 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2524#issuecomment-61570767
[Test build #22830 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22830/consoleFull)
for PR 2524 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2524#issuecomment-61570773
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3081#discussion_r19777251
--- Diff: docs/mllib-naive-bayes.md ---
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ JavaPairRDDDouble, Double predictionAndLabel =
});
double accuracy = 1.0 *
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2944#issuecomment-61573067
[Test build #22831 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22831/consoleFull)
for PR 2944 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2944#issuecomment-61573077
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2944#issuecomment-61573903
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3074#issuecomment-61575462
Very cool! I don't know what the Spark code style are, so can't really give
any code wise comments.
Have you tried this out already?
And also there should be
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3068#issuecomment-61575655
[Test build #22833 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22833/consoleFull)
for PR 3068 at commit
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082
[WIP][SPARK-3797] Run external shuffle service in Yarn NM
This creates a new module `network/yarn` that depends on `network/shuffle`
recently created in #3001. This PR introduces a custom Yarn
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#issuecomment-61575694
[Test build #22834 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22834/consoleFull)
for PR 1222 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#issuecomment-61575888
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#issuecomment-61575877
[Test build #22835 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22835/consoleFull)
for PR 3082 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#issuecomment-61575887
[Test build #22835 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22835/consoleFull)
for PR 3082 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2982#issuecomment-61576093
[Test build #22836 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22836/consoleFull)
for PR 2982 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2982#issuecomment-61576179
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2982#issuecomment-61576178
[Test build #22836 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22836/consoleFull)
for PR 2982 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#issuecomment-61576335
[Test build #22837 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22837/consoleFull)
for PR 3082 at commit
GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3083
[SPARK-4213] ParquetFilters - No support for LT, LTE, GT, GTE operators
Following description is quoted from JIRA:
When I issue a hql query against a HiveContext where my predicate uses a
GitHub user mengxr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3084
[FIX][MLLIB] fix seed in BaggedPointSuite
Saw Jenkins test failures due to random seeds.
@jkbradley
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3083#issuecomment-61576851
CC @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19779280
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -124,6 +126,22 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(sc:
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19779296
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -124,6 +126,22 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(sc:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2982#issuecomment-61577033
[Test build #22838 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22838/consoleFull)
for PR 2982 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3084#issuecomment-61577191
[Test build #22839 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22839/consoleFull)
for PR 3084 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19779445
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -124,6 +126,22 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(sc:
Github user manishamde commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3084#issuecomment-61577226
@mengxr Sorry, it's my fault. It looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19779489
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -124,6 +126,22 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(sc:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3083#issuecomment-61577408
[Test build #22840 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22840/consoleFull)
for PR 3083 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19779621
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -92,7 +93,19 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19779863
--- Diff:
network/yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/yarn/YarnShuffleService.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#issuecomment-61578165
LGTM aside some nits; I still have to catch up with the rest of the network
code changes to make more informed comments, though.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19779981
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
moduletools/module
modulenetwork/common/module
modulenetwork/shuffle/module
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3068#issuecomment-61578547
[Test build #22832 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22832/consoleFull)
for PR 3068 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3068#issuecomment-61578558
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19780190
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -92,7 +93,19 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19780219
--- Diff:
network/yarn/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/yarn/YarnShuffleService.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3078#issuecomment-61579504
[Test build #22842 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22842/consoleFull)
for PR 3078 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3070#discussion_r19780608
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/ExamplePointUDT.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3070#issuecomment-61579917
LGTM though I'll depend on @davies for feedback on the Python API on the
other PR [https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3068]
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3078#issuecomment-61580109
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19780952
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -124,6 +126,22 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(sc:
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3068#issuecomment-61580666
LGTM, let's ship it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3078#issuecomment-61580680
[Test build #510 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/510/consoleFull)
for PR 3078 at commit
Github user tianyi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2811#issuecomment-61580910
I think this PR is more concentrate on logical optimization, not speed.
Spark used three iterations to get the fileRDD list which is not necessary.
---
If your project
Github user liyezhang556520 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3035#issuecomment-61580908
@andrewor14 , can you help to check whether this patch is fine now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3085#issuecomment-61581027
/cc @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3085
[SPARK-4166][Core] Add a backward compatibility test for ExecutorLostFailure
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/zsxwing/spark
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3033#issuecomment-61581056
Already added it in #3085
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hellertime commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3074#issuecomment-61581145
This code has been in use for a while now. I'm currently building a
workflow reliant on the ability for spark to spin up its tasks inside docker.
Not sure
Github user tianyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#discussion_r19781336
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -49,7 +49,10 @@ trait StringRegexExpression {
Github user tianyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#discussion_r19781402
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -500,6 +500,23 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#issuecomment-61581363
[Test build #22843 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22843/consoleFull)
for PR 3082 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61581372
[Test build #22845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22845/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#discussion_r19781450
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
moduletools/module
modulenetwork/common/module
modulenetwork/shuffle/module
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3085#issuecomment-61581580
[Test build #22844 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22844/consoleFull)
for PR 3085 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3084#issuecomment-61581589
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3074#issuecomment-61581607
@hellertime yes I was referring to the coarse mode, I think it should be
straight forward enough to try to get coarse mode included in this patch (as I
learned getting a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#issuecomment-61581606
[Test build #22837 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22837/consoleFull)
for PR 3082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#issuecomment-61581614
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61581788
[Test build #22846 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22846/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2984#issuecomment-61582083
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user timothysc commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3074#issuecomment-61582163
+1 try to be as comprehensive as possible.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3083#issuecomment-61582213
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3083#issuecomment-61582205
[Test build #22840 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22840/consoleFull)
for PR 3083 at commit
Github user tianyi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#discussion_r19781741
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -49,7 +49,10 @@ trait StringRegexExpression {
Github user hellertime commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3074#issuecomment-61582366
Ok. I'll look into expanding this to coarse mode. It shouldn't be too bad.
Just need to work backwards on the protobuf objects.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2984#issuecomment-61582421
[Test build #22847 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22847/consoleFull)
for PR 2984 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3083#discussion_r19781777
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala ---
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ private[sql] object ParquetFilters {
Github user tianyi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2998#issuecomment-61582413
You have added a empty file case sensitivity in golden files, is it
related to this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3082#issuecomment-61582852
[Test build #22848 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22848/consoleFull)
for PR 3082 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#issuecomment-61582899
[Test build #22834 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22834/consoleFull)
for PR 1222 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#issuecomment-61582903
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3077
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3086
[SPARK-4163][Core] Add a backward compatibility test for FetchFailed
/cc @aarondav
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
201 - 300 of 436 matches
Mail list logo
