Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#discussion_r20050583
--- Diff: dev/fetch-pr ---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#issuecomment-62249644
This looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#discussion_r20050584
--- Diff: dev/fetch-pr ---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#issuecomment-62249680
Whoops, I missed Josh's comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#issuecomment-62249778
Yeah, it looks like there was a race condition. Good style point about
separating the pipeline commands onto their own lines; I always overlook these
kind of bash
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3098#issuecomment-62249929
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3098#issuecomment-62249927
[Test build #23091 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23091/consoleFull)
for PR 3098 at commit
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3147#discussion_r20050632
--- Diff: network/yarn/pom.xml ---
@@ -54,5 +54,38 @@
build
outputDirectorytarget/scala-${scala.binary.version}/classes/outputDirectory
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#issuecomment-62251084
[Test build #23092 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23092/consoleFull)
for PR 3165 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#issuecomment-62251086
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user aarondav opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3166
[Minor] [Core] Don't NPE on closeQuietly(null)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/aarondav/spark closeQuietlyer
Alternatively
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3166#issuecomment-62251256
[Test build #23093 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23093/consoleFull)
for PR 3166 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3167
SPARK-4305 [BUILD] yarn-alpha profile won't build due to network/yarn module
SPARK-3797 introduced the `network/yarn` module, but its YARN code depends
on YARN APIs not present in older versions
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3167#issuecomment-62251621
[Test build #23094 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23094/consoleFull)
for PR 3167 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3110#issuecomment-62251886
[Test build #23095 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23095/consoleFull)
for PR 3110 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3150#issuecomment-62251997
[Test build #23096 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23096/consoleFull)
for PR 3150 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2735#issuecomment-62252431
[Test build #23097 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23097/consoleFull)
for PR 2735 at commit
Github user comcmipi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2735#issuecomment-62252538
There is one more issue in this example. It could be the lack of my
understanding, or maybe a problem.
When the checkpoint exists and you send some lines to nc
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3166#issuecomment-62253365
[Test build #23093 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23093/consoleFull)
for PR 3166 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3166#issuecomment-62253367
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3168
SPARK-1344 [DOCS] Scala API docs for top methods
Use k in javadoc of top and takeOrdered to avoid confusion with type K in
pair RDDs. I think this resolves the discussion in SPARK-1344.
You can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3110#issuecomment-62253563
[Test build #23095 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23095/consoleFull)
for PR 3110 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3110#issuecomment-62253567
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3168#issuecomment-62253627
[Test build #23098 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23098/consoleFull)
for PR 3168 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3169
SPARK-971 [DOCS] Link to Confluence wiki from project website /
documentation
This is a trivial change to add links to the wiki from `README.md` and the
main docs page. It is already linked to from
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3169#issuecomment-62253730
[Test build #23099 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23099/consoleFull)
for PR 3169 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3150#issuecomment-62253734
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3150#issuecomment-62253732
[Test build #23096 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23096/consoleFull)
for PR 3150 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3167#issuecomment-62253944
[Test build #23094 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23094/consoleFull)
for PR 3167 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3167#issuecomment-62253946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2735#issuecomment-62254523
[Test build #23097 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23097/consoleFull)
for PR 2735 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2735#issuecomment-62254525
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3170
SPARK-948 [WEB UI] Move Classpath Entries in WebUI
This is a trivial change that resolves SPARK-948. Feel free to reject it
too if there's not agreement on it, and then the JIRA can be closed. Just
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3170#issuecomment-62254881
[Test build #23100 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23100/consoleFull)
for PR 3170 at commit
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-62254979
I agree with what @debasish83 said. We should find a suitable solution to
weight matrix distributed storage.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3168#issuecomment-62255698
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3168#issuecomment-62255695
[Test build #23098 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23098/consoleFull)
for PR 3168 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3169#issuecomment-62255849
[Test build #23099 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23099/consoleFull)
for PR 3169 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3169#issuecomment-62255850
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user tgaloppo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3022#issuecomment-62256712
This test appeared to fail due to some form of timeout during the pull; is
there any action I need to take?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3170#issuecomment-62257228
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3170#issuecomment-62257227
[Test build #23100 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23100/consoleFull)
for PR 3170 at commit
Github user culler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3066#issuecomment-62257326
Thanks! I'm proud to be a member of the club. :^)
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Cheng Lian notificati...@github.com
wrote:
@culler
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3139#discussion_r20051763
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveComparisonTest.scala
---
@@ -341,12 +341,21 @@ abstract class
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3131#discussion_r20051793
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveQl.scala ---
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import java.sql.Date
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3114#issuecomment-62259067
[Test build #23101 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23101/consoleFull)
for PR 3114 at commit
Github user varadharajan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2894#issuecomment-62259256
@jkbradley Makes sense. I've updated the warnings, please let me know if
wordings can be improved. Also i just noticed that pyspark classification model
does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2894#issuecomment-62259296
[Test build #23102 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23102/consoleFull)
for PR 2894 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3114#discussion_r20051871
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveInspectors.scala ---
@@ -254,46 +255,59 @@ private[hive] trait HiveInspectors {
Github user varadharajan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2894#issuecomment-62259405
Also i think it would help users if we can document in the LR section of
the MLlib guide, which algorithm should be preferred in which scenarios.
---
If your
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2864#issuecomment-62259510
Hi, @andrewor14 , Sorry about the misunderstanding and thanks for your
patient explanation
I will resubmit it and hopefully will get more feedbacks about
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3114#issuecomment-62260018
Thank you @marmbrus to review this.
All of primitive constant null value actually will not find a match, and
will be considered as normal ObjectInspector,
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3131#discussion_r20051950
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -428,7 +432,7 @@ private[hive] case class MetastoreRelation
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3131#discussion_r20051957
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -68,19 +66,25 @@ private[hive] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3131#issuecomment-62260293
[Test build #23103 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23103/consoleFull)
for PR 3131 at commit
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3131#discussion_r20051975
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -68,19 +66,25 @@ private[hive] class
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3137#issuecomment-62260611
Probably a better way is providing the Sort-Merge-Aggregation not just for
`DistinctCount`. I am working on a POC, hope we can discuss that soon.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3114#issuecomment-62261557
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3114#issuecomment-62261556
[Test build #23101 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23101/consoleFull)
for PR 3114 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2894#issuecomment-62262246
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2894#issuecomment-62262242
[Test build #23102 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23102/consoleFull)
for PR 2894 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3131#issuecomment-62262792
[Test build #23103 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23103/consoleFull)
for PR 3131 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3131#issuecomment-62262797
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user varadharajan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2847#issuecomment-62263230
As mentioned in comments of SPARK-2432. I was wondering how the PFP
versions compared with YAFIM
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3139#discussion_r20053092
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveComparisonTest.scala
---
@@ -341,12 +341,21 @@ abstract class HiveComparisonTest
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3124#issuecomment-62269619
cc @pwendell @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3158#issuecomment-62275092
[Test build #23104 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23104/consoleFull)
for PR 3158 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3158#issuecomment-62276461
[Test build #23104 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23104/consoleFull)
for PR 3158 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3158#issuecomment-62276463
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3158#issuecomment-62278623
[Test build #23105 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23105/consoleFull)
for PR 3158 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3158#issuecomment-62278701
[Test build #23106 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23106/consoleFull)
for PR 3158 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3166#issuecomment-62278736
Merged in master branch-1.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3166
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3158#issuecomment-62278862
[Test build #23105 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23105/consoleFull)
for PR 3158 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3158#issuecomment-62278867
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#issuecomment-62279046
Why not using hub? It is super easy and we don't need to duplicate the
work.
https://github.com/github/hub
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#issuecomment-62279935
Just realized Josh also pointed this out earlier. I've been using hub and
it's pretty good. It does require a local branch, but that's pretty easy to do.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3158#issuecomment-62281019
[Test build #23106 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23106/consoleFull)
for PR 3158 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3158#issuecomment-62281021
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2968#discussion_r20055135
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/metrics/InputOutputMetricsSuite.scala ---
@@ -73,4 +78,32 @@ class InputMetricsSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2968#issuecomment-62282883
[Test build #23107 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23107/consoleFull)
for PR 2968 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2968#issuecomment-62285463
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2968#issuecomment-62285457
[Test build #23107 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23107/consoleFull)
for PR 2968 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3160#issuecomment-62287744
merging this. thanks josh for this PR!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3160
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user adampingel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2947#issuecomment-62288693
Algebird 0.8.1 for Scala 2.11 is on the central repo:
http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.twitter%7Calgebird_2.11%7C0.8.1%7Cjar
---
If your project is set
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#issuecomment-62288892
I didn't use hub - but I preferred this since I can just create a temporary
ref that gets thrown away and I never have to worry about cleaning it up.
---
If your
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3165#issuecomment-62288954
I'm actually happy to just drop this though if we can update the
documentation in our wiki to suggest people use hub. @JoshRosen or @rxin would
one of you guys be able
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3159#issuecomment-62289504
[Test build #23108 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23108/consoleFull)
for PR 3159 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3159#issuecomment-62289725
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user pwendell closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2986
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2986#issuecomment-62289760
@JoshRosen yes I will add docs - this was just running some tests through
jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3159#issuecomment-62289795
[Test build #23109 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23109/consoleFull)
for PR 3159 at commit
GitHub user scwf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3171
[SQL] Minor fix for TreeNode
1 remove `case` never reached
2 add transformUp for test(transform works on nodes with Option children)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3171#issuecomment-62290939
[Test build #23110 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23110/consoleFull)
for PR 3171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3171#issuecomment-62291100
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3172
[SPARK-4307] Initialize FileDescriptor lazily in FileRegion.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rxin/spark lazyFD
Alternatively you
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3172#discussion_r20056703
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/FileShuffleBlockManager.scala ---
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ import java.nio.ByteBuffer
import
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3172#discussion_r20056709
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/FileSegmentManagedBuffer.java
---
@@ -31,27 +31,27 @@
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3172#issuecomment-62291803
[Test build #23111 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23111/consoleFull)
for PR 3172 at commit
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
