Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3901#issuecomment-71923298
@davies Sure, let's pull this in for 1.3. Sorry for letting this hang in
the review queue for so long. This looks good to me, so I'm going to merge it
to `master`.
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23726705
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -144,4 +150,116 @@ object KafkaUtils {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4222#issuecomment-71923634
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3901
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4222#issuecomment-71923618
[Test build #26248 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26248/consoleFull)
for PR 4222 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4236#issuecomment-71924451
Thanks for adding tests. This looks good to me, so I'm going to merge it
into `master` (1.3.0) and mark it for later backport into `branch-1.2` (I'd
commit it now,
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23727215
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4216#issuecomment-71924525
I made a comment at one spot in the code, but throughout I find the name
stable confusing. It implies the other one is unstable, and without the
context from the JIRA,
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3962#issuecomment-71910884
LGTM actually. I'm going to merge this into master after adding the comment
I talked about earlier. Thanks for explaining your reasoning @lianhuiwang.
---
If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3988
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4225#issuecomment-71912133
Thanks @srowen and @zsxwing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3670#discussion_r23722407
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -24,29 +24,37 @@ import java.net.URI
import java.util.{Arrays, Properties, UUID}
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4230#issuecomment-7191
Merging into master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4224
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3670#issuecomment-71914187
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-71915043
Unrelated failure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3969#issuecomment-71916721
LGTM I'll merge this after the 1.2.1 release is out of the window.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3970#issuecomment-71916636
Hey @liyezhang556520 would you mind closing this it's now merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3670#discussion_r23723912
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -72,4 +74,87 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends FunSuite with
LocalSparkContext
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4236#issuecomment-71920676
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4236#issuecomment-71920662
[Test build #26243 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26243/consoleFull)
for PR 4236 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4216#issuecomment-71921055
Hi @andrewor14,
Although this patch adds many lines, its scope is actually limited only
to standalone cluster mode, and the default submit behavior is actually
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23726607
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -144,4 +150,116 @@ object KafkaUtils {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23726961
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-71923990
lgtm.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4220#issuecomment-71923968
Kinda diverging into off-topic territory, but...
It seems like having multiple apps futzing w/ the system properties at
the same time is bound to create
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23726952
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -144,4 +150,116 @@ object KafkaUtils {
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4236#discussion_r23727281
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/SerDeUtilSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-71924683
[Test build #568 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/568/consoleFull)
for PR 4253 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4197#issuecomment-71924766
Just for completeness: `FileStatus.isDir()` is also deprecated...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4216#discussion_r23719735
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -121,6 +122,17 @@ private[spark] class Master(
throw new
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253
[SPARK-5461] [graphx] Add isCheckpointed, getCheckpointedFiles methods to
Graph
Added the 2 methods to Graph and GraphImpl. Both make calls to the
underlying vertex and edge RDDs.
This
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4151#issuecomment-71911954
@davies I merged your changes and moved `Identifiable` to `util.py`. Could
you make a final pass?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4151#issuecomment-71912647
[Test build #26246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26246/consoleFull)
for PR 4151 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4224#issuecomment-71913993
Ok I'm merging this into master and marking it as backport needed (since
we're in the middle of a 1.2.1 release)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4137#issuecomment-71916234
@liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3670#discussion_r23723648
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -555,17 +584,42 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4137#issuecomment-71916253
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3670#issuecomment-71917373
Seems like tests are failing because of the `isDirectory` issue:
[error]
/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4252#issuecomment-71919727
Latest patch LGTM. Thanks for the extra cleanup too!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4155#discussion_r23725993
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkHadoopWriter.scala ---
@@ -106,18 +107,30 @@ class SparkHadoopWriter(@transient jobConf: JobConf)
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23726392
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -144,4 +150,116 @@ object KafkaUtils {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4151#issuecomment-71922343
[Test build #26244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26244/consoleFull)
for PR 4151 at commit
GitHub user fjiang6 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4254
[SPARK-4259][MLlib]: Add Power Iteration Clustering Algorithm with Gaussian
Similarity Function
Add single pseudo-eigenvector PIC
Including documentations, one property file and updated pom.xml
Github user orenmazor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3901#issuecomment-71925039
:dancer: :shipit:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4151#issuecomment-71925161
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4255#issuecomment-71938129
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4241#issuecomment-71940279
[Test build #26263 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26263/consoleFull)
for PR 4241 at commit
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3233#issuecomment-71943787
The new spark.driver.userClassPathFirst property seems a little strange to
me in that, IIUC, it only takes effect when the driver is started through the
application
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4151#discussion_r23736564
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/shared.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-71945158
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-71946532
That broke some stuff...will fix soon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4014#issuecomment-71947781
[Test build #26268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26268/consoleFull)
for PR 4014 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4254#issuecomment-71947798
[Test build #26272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26272/consoleFull)
for PR 4254 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4014#issuecomment-71947786
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#issuecomment-71951033
[Test build #26267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26267/consoleFull)
for PR 4256 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4151#issuecomment-71951198
Merged into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#issuecomment-71951042
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4237#issuecomment-71910948
[Test build #26240 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26240/consoleFull)
for PR 4237 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4237#issuecomment-71910964
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4252#issuecomment-71912254
Hi @pwendell ,
Did you check that jetty classes only show up in spark-core's jar? I see a
jetty dependency in `streaming/pom.xml`, so I'm afraid that would cause
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3670#issuecomment-71914178
[Test build #26241 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26241/consoleFull)
for PR 3670 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-71914257
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4222#issuecomment-71914714
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4213
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4216#discussion_r23724419
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/rest/SubmitRestProtocolMessage.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4241#issuecomment-71919673
[Test build #26251 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26251/consoleFull)
for PR 4241 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4252#discussion_r23725257
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -337,25 +337,38 @@
/exclusion
/exclusions
/dependency
+
+ !-- Shaded deps marked
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3715#issuecomment-71922614
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4253#issuecomment-71923563
@rxin Added more doc. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23727132
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -144,4 +150,116 @@ object KafkaUtils {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23727115
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-71937434
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3715#issuecomment-71941597
[Test build #569 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/569/consoleFull)
for PR 3715 at commit
GitHub user brkyvz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256
[SPARK-3977] Conversion methods for BlockMatrix to other Distributed
Matrices
The conversion methods for `BlockMatrix`. Conversions go through
`CoordinateMatrix` in order to cause a shuffle so that
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4216#discussion_r23736007
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/rest/SubmitRestProtocolMessage.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4151#issuecomment-71942733
[Test build #26266 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26266/consoleFull)
for PR 4151 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#issuecomment-7194
[Test build #26267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26267/consoleFull)
for PR 4256 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4014#issuecomment-71943344
[Test build #26268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26268/consoleFull)
for PR 4014 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-71945152
[Test build #26262 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26262/consoleFull)
for PR 4215 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#issuecomment-71946157
[Test build #26270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26270/consoleFull)
for PR 4256 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3246#issuecomment-71946175
@tdas Do you have time to look at this to see if it is ready to merge?
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#discussion_r23737948
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -144,4 +150,116 @@ object KafkaUtils {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3233#issuecomment-71947316
[Test build #26271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26271/consoleFull)
for PR 3233 at commit
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3233#discussion_r23738607
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -375,4 +390,64 @@ private[spark] object SparkConf {
def isSparkPortConf(name:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#issuecomment-71949428
[Test build #26265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26265/consoleFull)
for PR 4256 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4241#issuecomment-71950869
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#discussion_r23739791
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -182,6 +184,38 @@ class BlockMatrix(
this
}
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#discussion_r23739809
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/IndexedRowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -75,6 +77,23 @@ class IndexedRowMatrix(
new
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#discussion_r23739799
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/IndexedRowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#discussion_r23739796
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/CoordinateMatrix.scala
---
@@ -98,6 +97,59 @@ class CoordinateMatrix(
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#discussion_r23739788
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -182,6 +184,38 @@ class BlockMatrix(
this
}
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4256#discussion_r23739793
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/CoordinateMatrix.scala
---
@@ -98,6 +97,59 @@ class CoordinateMatrix(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4241#issuecomment-71950863
[Test build #26263 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26263/consoleFull)
for PR 4241 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4151
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4255#issuecomment-71938124
[Test build #26254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26254/consoleFull)
for PR 4255 at commit
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4216#issuecomment-71938252
If you guys have concerns about the protocol, you should comment on it or
on the JIRA; the protocol was posted 5 days ago. Really what matters for this
release is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3670#issuecomment-71938967
[Test build #26257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26257/consoleFull)
for PR 3670 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-71938989
[Test build #26262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26262/consoleFull)
for PR 4215 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3670#issuecomment-71938975
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
201 - 300 of 713 matches
Mail list logo
