Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72785067
[Test build #26712 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26712/consoleFull)
for PR 4066 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4352#issuecomment-72784977
Note: `getModificationTime` returning `Option[Long]` is not super pretty,
but it avoids a second call to `fs.listStatus` to get rid of empty directories,
thus avoiding
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4352#issuecomment-72785062
[Test build #26711 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26711/consoleFull)
for PR 4352 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#issuecomment-72786425
[Test build #26705 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26705/consoleFull)
for PR 4351 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#issuecomment-72786434
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1717#issuecomment-72789158
[Test build #26709 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26709/consoleFull)
for PR 1717 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1717#issuecomment-72789165
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4249#discussion_r24062294
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -63,6 +63,37 @@ class HiveQuerySuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4216#issuecomment-72791649
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4227#issuecomment-72792300
@marmbrus this looks good to me. Any more comments?
@OopsOutOfMemory would be great to bring this up to date with master.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354#issuecomment-72792353
@rxin not sure for that, but here i just adapt it as filter + join in
HiveQL.scala, no changes in catalyst and sql/core, maybe we can support it
since it is at a small
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3803#issuecomment-72793369
[Test build #26725 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26725/consoleFull)
for PR 3803 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354#issuecomment-72794276
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354#issuecomment-72794269
[Test build #26721 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26721/consoleFull)
for PR 4354 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4348#discussion_r24063848
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameImpl.scala
---
@@ -179,10 +179,20 @@ private[sql] class DataFrameImpl protected[sql](
Github user freeman-lab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3803#discussion_r24064747
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -671,7 +674,11 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3959#issuecomment-72797801
Whats the state of this PR? Is it still relevant?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4289#discussion_r24058262
--- Diff:
sql/hive/v0.12.0/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/Shim12.scala ---
@@ -242,6 +242,11 @@ private[hive] object HiveShim {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4062#issuecomment-72783174
[Test build #26708 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26708/consoleFull)
for PR 4062 at commit
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1767#issuecomment-72783192
@maropu I'd like to merge this. It would be great if you could fix it up,
maybe in a new PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4062#issuecomment-72783177
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#discussion_r24060903
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -17,14 +17,17 @@
package
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4345#discussion_r24061664
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -132,14 +132,14 @@ class LogisticRegressionModel private[ml]
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#issuecomment-72787496
[Test build #26719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26719/consoleFull)
for PR 4233 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4345#discussion_r24061660
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -26,9 +27,8 @@ import
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.errors.TreeNodeException
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#issuecomment-72787523
That last commit did significant re-organization and cleanups to address
@mengxr 's comments. Hopefully good to go now! I won't put any more models in
this PR.
---
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#discussion_r24062243
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -2263,18 +2263,6 @@ def subtract(self, other):
return DataFrame(getattr(self._jdf,
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4349#issuecomment-72789630
Merged into master and branch-1.3.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4352#issuecomment-72790117
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4353#issuecomment-72790907
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4353#issuecomment-72790902
[Test build #26714 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26714/consoleFull)
for PR 4353 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354#issuecomment-72790981
Is this actually used by anybody?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4355#issuecomment-72795703
[Test build #26724 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26724/consoleFull)
for PR 4355 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4355#issuecomment-72795711
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4348#discussion_r24064580
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameImpl.scala
---
@@ -179,10 +179,20 @@ private[sql] class DataFrameImpl protected[sql](
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4348#issuecomment-72796555
We can discuss more offline. For now let's keep this separate, otherwise it
can be fairly annoying to use column names that contain space or column names
that contain any
Github user viper-kun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4307#issuecomment-72777528
Thanks, the issue is fixed by #4325. I will close this pr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#issuecomment-72777617
[Test build #26705 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26705/consoleFull)
for PR 4351 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4345#issuecomment-72781877
[Test build #26698 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26698/consoleFull)
for PR 4345 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-72783048
One approach would be to have non-authorized committers block in the
`canCommit` call until the master knows whether the authorized commit has
succeeded. In these
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4062#issuecomment-72783101
[Test build #26708 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26708/consoleFull)
for PR 4062 at commit
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72783141
Yeah, more importantly it's so defaults for things like connection timeouts
match what kafka provides.
It's possible to assign fake zookeeper.connect and
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4147#issuecomment-72783843
@kayousterhout sure - that seems fine to me!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1717#issuecomment-72783897
[Test build #26709 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26709/consoleFull)
for PR 1717 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4216#issuecomment-72788602
Thanks everyone for your comments. It seems that the main common concern is
that this protocol does not follow conventions expected in other REST
protocols. As of the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4147#issuecomment-72775964
[Test build #576 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/576/consoleFull)
for PR 4147 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4147#issuecomment-72776322
[Test build #26702 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26702/consoleFull)
for PR 4147 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72779120
Hey Cody, I was trying it and I found a odd behavior. It was printing this
repeatedly.
```
15/02/03 18:22:08 WARN VerifiableProperties: Property
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3798#issuecomment-72782434
I see. ConsumerConfig is really necessary only for high-level consumer, but
you are using it configure stuff in the low level consumer as well. That is so
that you dont
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3642#issuecomment-72783414
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user lazyman500 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4310#discussion_r24060365
--- Diff: docs/spark-standalone.md ---
@@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ You can optionally configure the cluster further by
setting environment variable
table
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3655#issuecomment-72784691
[Test build #26710 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26710/consoleFull)
for PR 3655 at commit
GitHub user scwf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4353
[SPARK-5367][SQL] Support star expression in udfs
A follow up for #4163: support select array(key, *) from src
Since array(key, *) will not go into this case
```
case Alias(f @
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3803#discussion_r24061094
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/java/JavaStreamingContext.scala
---
@@ -210,6 +211,20 @@ class JavaStreamingContext(val ssc:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4353#issuecomment-72785853
[Test build #26714 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26714/consoleFull)
for PR 4353 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3803#issuecomment-72785812
LGTM. Just two minor nits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354#issuecomment-72787877
[Test build #26720 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26720/consoleFull)
for PR 4354 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354#issuecomment-72787879
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354#issuecomment-72787822
[Test build #26720 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26720/consoleFull)
for PR 4354 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4348#discussion_r24062195
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -2126,10 +2126,9 @@ def sort(self, *cols):
if not cols:
raise
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354#issuecomment-72788828
[Test build #26722 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26722/consoleFull)
for PR 4354 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#issuecomment-72792829
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4233#issuecomment-72792822
[Test build #26719 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26719/consoleFull)
for PR 4233 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354#issuecomment-72794392
Yea in that case maybe let's not support it. It's hard for me to imagine
somebody using this :)
Thanks a lot for investigating this though. We can merge this patch
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354#issuecomment-72796072
ok, i am closing this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user scwf closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4354
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24066157
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
Github user xiliu82 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2267
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-72803094
[Test build #26726 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26726/consoleFull)
for PR 4171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4171#issuecomment-72803099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4344#issuecomment-72805078
[Test build #26728 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26728/consoleFull)
for PR 4344 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#issuecomment-72805131
[Test build #26733 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26733/consoleFull)
for PR 3779 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4344#issuecomment-72805081
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24065322
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#discussion_r24065334
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql.py ---
@@ -2263,18 +2263,6 @@ def subtract(self, other):
return DataFrame(getattr(self._jdf,
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215#issuecomment-72798586
I merged this - thanks Burak!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24065269
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3803#issuecomment-72800036
Thanks Jeremy! Good clean patch!
On Feb 3, 2015 10:45 PM, UCB AMPLab notificati...@github.com wrote:
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24065817
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24066349
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4358#issuecomment-72801980
[Test build #26731 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26731/consoleFull)
for PR 4358 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4358#issuecomment-72803705
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user chenghao-intel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4356
[SPARK-5068] [SQL] Fix bug query data when path doesn't exist for
HiveContext
This is a follow up for #3907 #3891 .
Hive actually support the not existed path(either table or
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4343#issuecomment-72798850
@jacek-lewandowski how about just catching either exception?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4344#issuecomment-72798856
[Test build #26728 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26728/consoleFull)
for PR 4344 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4351#issuecomment-72798853
[Test build #26727 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26727/consoleFull)
for PR 4351 at commit
GitHub user scwf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4357
[SQL][SPARK-5587] Support change database owner
Support change database owner, here i do not add the golden files since the
golden answer is related to the tmp dir path
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24065900
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4358
[SPARK-5585] Flaky test in MLlib python
Add a seed for tests.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/davies/spark flaky_test
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1767#issuecomment-72804365
Ok, I'll take it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24065627
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
* Get the
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24066137
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24067496
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,63 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
* Get the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3803#issuecomment-72799040
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24065873
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3779#discussion_r24066698
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -506,13 +506,59 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
*
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3803
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4349
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4348
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4215
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
101 - 200 of 684 matches
Mail list logo
