Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4503#issuecomment-73721723
Yes it's a small thing but the examples should call `stop()`. I can merge
if you'll move the imports accordingly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4503#discussion_r24421234
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/LDAExample.scala ---
@@ -21,15 +21,12 @@ import java.text.BreakIterator
import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4502#issuecomment-73706898
[Test build #27204 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27204/consoleFull)
for PR 4502 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4502#issuecomment-73706909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4503#issuecomment-73717571
The ut failure seems irrelevant.
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4498#discussion_r24419929
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/context.py ---
@@ -186,7 +189,7 @@ def inferSchema(self, rdd, samplingRatio=None):
warnings.warn(Some of
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4503#issuecomment-73724629
[Test build #27208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27208/consoleFull)
for PR 4503 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4505#issuecomment-73710867
[Test build #27206 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27206/consoleFull)
for PR 4505 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4505#issuecomment-73710872
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4455
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4506#issuecomment-73711308
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4506#issuecomment-73711302
[Test build #27207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27207/consoleFull)
for PR 4506 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4503#issuecomment-73725939
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4503#issuecomment-73726711
[Test build #27209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27209/consoleFull)
for PR 4503 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4496#issuecomment-73708785
[Test build #27205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27205/consoleFull)
for PR 4496 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4496#issuecomment-73708791
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4455#issuecomment-73721997
Passes tests, positive review from Josh and nchammas, looks OK to me, I'll
merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3631#issuecomment-73728226
This will need some changes to KafkaCluster and possibly other things
related to the new api... let me know if you want a hand.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4467#discussion_r24468323
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -202,16 +232,21 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4514#issuecomment-73820275
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#discussion_r24468427
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/OutputCommitCoordinator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4446#issuecomment-73820280
[Test build #27244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27244/consoleFull)
for PR 4446 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4514#issuecomment-73820269
[Test build #27248 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27248/consoleFull)
for PR 4514 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4446#issuecomment-73820283
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4439
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4467#discussion_r24468104
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -67,13 +67,39 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc:
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4467#discussion_r24468119
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
---
@@ -67,13 +67,39 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4495#issuecomment-73819189
[Test build #27245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27245/consoleFull)
for PR 4495 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4474
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4495#issuecomment-73819197
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4511#issuecomment-73819460
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-73822283
LGTM, I will merge this once tests pass
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4514#issuecomment-73823479
[Test build #27257 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27257/consoleFull)
for PR 4514 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4514#issuecomment-73824804
This is a very bold change. :)
* 10K feet comment - Isnt ManualClock more descriptive name than FakeClock?
* For other clocks, like the Clock in streaming, since
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4495#discussion_r24471472
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/PowerIterationClusteringExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4495#discussion_r24471469
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/PowerIterationClusteringExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4495#discussion_r24471456
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/PowerIterationClusteringExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4495#discussion_r24471466
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/PowerIterationClusteringExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4495#discussion_r24471458
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/PowerIterationClusteringExample.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4517#issuecomment-73826439
[Test build #27253 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27253/consoleFull)
for PR 4517 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4425#issuecomment-73827534
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4425#issuecomment-73827532
[Test build #27260 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27260/consoleFull)
for PR 4425 at commit
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4425#issuecomment-73827898
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4289#issuecomment-73828057
[Test build #27267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27267/consoleFull)
for PR 4289 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4492#discussion_r24472213
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/json/JsonRDD.scala
---
@@ -127,7 +135,7 @@ private[sql] object JsonRDD extends Logging {
Github user florianverhein commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4487#issuecomment-73829153
Good point. I don't use any yet... However, here is a concrete case where I
will soon:
https://github.com/florianverhein/spark-ec2/tree/packer/extra
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4492#discussion_r24472531
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -380,6 +380,11 @@ class SQLContext(@transient val sparkContext:
SparkContext)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4500#issuecomment-73829962
[Test build #27265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27265/consoleFull)
for PR 4500 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4500#issuecomment-73829965
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4520#issuecomment-73830800
[Test build #27271 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27271/consoleFull)
for PR 4520 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4520#issuecomment-73830805
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4467#issuecomment-73831487
The state behavior should be:
* If state = Initialized, then disallow all actions. (actor is not
initialized yet)
* If state = Started, then allow all
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4518
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4467#issuecomment-73832125
It should accept addblock even it is stopping because there might be
receivers processing data.
Modified state behavior should be:
* If state =
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4489
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4439#issuecomment-73819702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4517
SPARK-5728 [STREAMING] MQTTStreamSuite leaves behind ActiveMQ database files
Use temp dir for ActiveMQ database
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4446
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4496#discussion_r24468615
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameImpl.scala
---
@@ -112,6 +112,12 @@ private[sql] class DataFrameImpl protected[sql](
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4498#issuecomment-73821969
@pwendell I think this PR is ready to go, just wait for jenkins or not.
(The last commit just remove a API and the test for it)
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4516#issuecomment-73823199
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4516#issuecomment-73823195
[Test build #27249 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27249/consoleFull)
for PR 4516 at commit
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4467#issuecomment-73824469
I realized that this is a tricky thing to fix while maintaining the
stopGracefully semantics. Stop gracefully must ensure that if there are
receivers that have already
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4425#issuecomment-73824551
[Test build #27260 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27260/consoleFull)
for PR 4425 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4519#issuecomment-73824873
[Test build #27261 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27261/consoleFull)
for PR 4519 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4514#discussion_r24470877
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Clock.scala ---
@@ -22,8 +22,35 @@ package org.apache.spark.util
*/
private[spark] trait Clock {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4496#issuecomment-73824898
[Test build #27262 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27262/consoleFull)
for PR 4496 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4519#issuecomment-73825662
[Test build #27263 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27263/consoleFull)
for PR 4519 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4511#issuecomment-73829002
[Test build #27269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27269/consoleFull)
for PR 4511 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4520#issuecomment-73829637
[Test build #27270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27270/consoleFull)
for PR 4520 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4520#issuecomment-73829638
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4520#issuecomment-73829581
[Test build #27270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27270/consoleFull)
for PR 4520 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4520#issuecomment-73830143
[Test build #27271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27271/consoleFull)
for PR 4520 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4425#issuecomment-7383
[Test build #27272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27272/consoleFull)
for PR 4425 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4511#issuecomment-73831038
[Test build #597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/597/consoleFull)
for PR 4511 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4492#discussion_r24473563
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -380,6 +380,11 @@ class SQLContext(@transient val sparkContext:
SparkContext)
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-73831899
I only merged this into master and 1.3 for now because there are
significant merge conflicts. Thanks @JoshRosen and @mccheah.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4519#issuecomment-73832523
[Test build #27263 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27263/consoleFull)
for PR 4519 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4519#issuecomment-73832527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4467#issuecomment-73833008
[Test build #27273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27273/consoleFull)
for PR 4467 at commit
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4512#issuecomment-73833709
I see. you mean provide an empty class in our code base?
But, since they are discussing about removing Akka from Spark, is it still
worth doing this (instead
Github user florianverhein commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4487#issuecomment-73833605
... Actually that `extra` example should technically be able to be made to
work without substitution as I source the `/root/extra/*.sh` scripts in
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4517#issuecomment-73820559
[Test build #27253 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27253/consoleFull)
for PR 4517 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3916#issuecomment-73821334
[Test build #27246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27246/consoleFull)
for PR 3916 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-73821367
[Test build #27254 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27254/consoleFull)
for PR 4066 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4496#discussion_r24470163
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -600,6 +600,15 @@ trait Column extends DataFrame {
def desc: Column =
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4496#issuecomment-73823591
mind rebasing quickly? we are going to cut a snapshot release soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4496#issuecomment-73823643
yes, I am working on it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4496#discussion_r24470202
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -600,6 +600,15 @@ trait Column extends DataFrame {
def desc: Column =
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4496#discussion_r24470189
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -600,6 +600,15 @@ trait Column extends DataFrame {
def desc: Column =
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4468#issuecomment-73823993
@marmbrus any more comment on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4508#issuecomment-73824064
[Test build #27250 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27250/consoleFull)
for PR 4508 at commit
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4519
[SQL][DataFrame] Fix column computability bug.
Do not recursively strip out projects. Only strip the first level project.
```scala
df(colA) + df(colB).as(colC)
```
Previously,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4512#issuecomment-73825418
[Test build #27252 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27252/consoleFull)
for PR 4512 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066#issuecomment-73826010
[Test build #27264 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27264/consoleFull)
for PR 4066 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4511#issuecomment-73826099
[Test build #597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/597/consoleFull)
for PR 4511 at commit
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4512#issuecomment-73833260
Ahh looks like the threshold property is gone, I think the most appropriate
solution is to provide empty implementation under this property
`implementation-class =
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4498#issuecomment-73821777
After talk to @yhuai offline, he suggested that we could hold on for Scala
API for createDataFrame(rdd, columns), it's not so useful right now. We can
revisit it later.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4498#issuecomment-73821807
[Test build #27255 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27255/consoleFull)
for PR 4498 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4468#issuecomment-73824443
Thanks, merged to master and 1.3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
1 - 100 of 663 matches
Mail list logo
