Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10099#issuecomment-161313910
**[Test build #47063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47063/consoleFull)**
for PR 10099 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10037#issuecomment-161313328
**[Test build #47065 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47065/consoleFull)**
for PR 10037 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10037#issuecomment-161313652
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10103#issuecomment-161329692
OK, seems reasonable
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10069#issuecomment-161345176
**[Test build #47070 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47070/consoleFull)**
for PR 10069 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10069#issuecomment-161345183
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10099#issuecomment-161314258
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tyro89 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8747#issuecomment-161338170
I believe there might be an issue here with respect to the buffer growing
strategy: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12089
---
If your project is set up for
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10089#discussion_r46431401
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -364,8 +365,8 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10089#discussion_r46431493
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -36,9 +36,10 @@ import
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r46434094
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/ExtensionServiceIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10071#issuecomment-161318754
**[Test build #47059 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47059/consoleFull)**
for PR 10071 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10071#issuecomment-161318946
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#issuecomment-161336155
So, I like the code as it is now. I'm having trouble running Spark on Mesos
in cluster mode, as always, so I didn't manage to test it, but that's most
likely unrelated
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9338#issuecomment-161336585
**[Test build #47069 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47069/consoleFull)**
for PR 9338 at commit
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10069#discussion_r46429985
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -193,7 +192,7 @@ private[spark] object Task {
dataOut.flush()
val
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10069#issuecomment-161345184
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10089#issuecomment-161352747
This generally looks sensible to me, would like to see if it solves your
issue first. Thanks for working on it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10103#issuecomment-161327890
**[Test build #47066 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47066/consoleFull)**
for PR 10103 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10104#discussion_r46429689
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ To build Spark and its example programs, run:
(You do not need to do this if you downloaded a pre-built
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#issuecomment-161340834
Hi @marmbrus , I updated it and did some simplification, could you take a
look? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9338#issuecomment-161350879
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user hhbyyh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10103
[SPARK-12096] [MLlib] remove the old constraint in word2vec
jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12096
word2vec now can handle much bigger vocabulary.
The old constraint
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8923#issuecomment-161311392
@suyanNone still needs the test case
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10089#discussion_r46431828
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -89,23 +89,29 @@ class
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10089#discussion_r46438227
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -89,23 +89,29 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#issuecomment-161328065
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10103#issuecomment-161328139
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#issuecomment-161328381
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r46432466
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -51,6 +51,64 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10037#issuecomment-161313648
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10099#issuecomment-161314262
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10103#issuecomment-161314416
**[Test build #47066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47066/consoleFull)**
for PR 10103 at commit
GitHub user kaklakariada opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10104
Add links howto to setup IDEs for developing spark
These links make it easier for new developers to work with Spark in their
IDE.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10071#issuecomment-161318950
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10045#issuecomment-161324412
:open_mouth: wow that is definitely not a situation I had given a lot of
thought to :)
But would you agree this is a special case, behavior that a user would have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#issuecomment-161328382
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10069#issuecomment-161343250
**[Test build #47070 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47070/consoleFull)**
for PR 10069 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#issuecomment-161343319
**[Test build #47071 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47071/consoleFull)**
for PR 8066 at commit
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10081#discussion_r46432025
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/memory/UnifiedMemoryManager.scala ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@ private[spark] class UnifiedMemoryManager
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9338#issuecomment-161350874
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9338#issuecomment-161350650
**[Test build #47069 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47069/consoleFull)**
for PR 9338 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10103#issuecomment-161328137
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#issuecomment-161328379
**[Test build #47068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47068/consoleFull)**
for PR 10094 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#issuecomment-161327831
**[Test build #47068 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47068/consoleFull)**
for PR 10094 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#issuecomment-161328068
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10104#issuecomment-161336649
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user DoHe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4897#issuecomment-161336531
For the test you could also add a local egg file to the repository and
install this instead of relying on the external pypi server.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user dskrvk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9867#issuecomment-161337172
Thanks @rxin. Would appreciate a "Ship it" on this (unless there are
issues). Don't mean to whine, but the longer we wait, the bigger this PR
becomes as I have to fix
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10102#discussion_r46431705
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/StreamingTest.scala ---
@@ -17,13 +17,31 @@
package
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r46432648
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -51,6 +51,64 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#discussion_r46433390
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SchedulerExtensionService.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9182#issuecomment-16135
**[Test build #47072 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47072/consoleFull)**
for PR 9182 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#issuecomment-161388544
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10105#issuecomment-161392614
**[Test build #47075 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47075/consoleFull)**
for PR 10105 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10105#issuecomment-161392709
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10099
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9427#issuecomment-161375635
[Test build #2150 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2150/consoleFull)
for PR 9427 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10083#issuecomment-161385655
**[Test build #47077 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47077/consoleFull)**
for PR 10083 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#discussion_r46452046
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/SortOptimizeSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#discussion_r46452998
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -919,3 +920,63 @@ object
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10106#issuecomment-161394118
cc @yanboliang who created the Jira
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10073#issuecomment-161378117
**[Test build #2151 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2151/consoleFull)**
for PR 10073 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10083#discussion_r46448867
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/pythonconverters/AvroConverters.scala
---
@@ -79,7 +79,10 @@ object AvroConversionUtil extends
Github user JasonMWhite commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10089#discussion_r46449571
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -89,23 +89,29 @@ class
Github user JasonMWhite commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10089#discussion_r46449467
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -364,8 +365,8 @@ class
Github user JasonMWhite commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10089#discussion_r46449516
--- Diff:
external/kafka/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -36,9 +36,10 @@ import
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10076#issuecomment-161387484
I want to put this one on hold until #10083 gets merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9589#issuecomment-161387321
Unfortunately RC1 has been cut already and changes to initialization are
too likely to break things at this point.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#issuecomment-161365442
It might be nice to only expose a smaller # of storage levels in Python,
i.e. call them memory_only and memory_and_disk, but always use the serialized
ones underneath.
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10045#issuecomment-161370485
Sure, I am fine with it not being default behavior - but there should be
some way to override the default behavior. For example here, as long as there
exists a way to
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10099#issuecomment-161374655
Merging to master and branch 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10083#discussion_r46451232
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader.java
---
@@ -334,10 +334,11 @@ private
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9589#discussion_r46451745
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/ClientWrapper.scala ---
@@ -151,29 +152,34 @@ private[hive] class ClientWrapper(
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#discussion_r46452734
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/SortOptimizeSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10073#issuecomment-161390668
**[Test build #2151 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2151/consoleFull)**
for PR 10073 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10105#issuecomment-161392711
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10073#issuecomment-161386298
**[Test build #47076 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47076/consoleFull)**
for PR 10073 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#issuecomment-161359505
**[Test build #47073 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47073/consoleFull)**
for PR 8066 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9867#issuecomment-161371851
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9867#issuecomment-161371987
Hey @dskrvk, sorry to let this slip through the cracks. I'm going to
shepherd this today to try to get it merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#issuecomment-161373647
**[Test build #47071 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47071/consoleFull)**
for PR 8066 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#issuecomment-161373888
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9867#issuecomment-161373793
**[Test build #47074 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47074/consoleFull)**
for PR 9867 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#issuecomment-161373891
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user yinxusen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10105
[SPARK-12098] Cross validator with multi-arm bandit search
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12098
The classic cross-validation requires all inner classifiers iterate to a
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10067#issuecomment-161388052
no problem!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#discussion_r46452176
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/SortOptimizeSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#issuecomment-161389843
A few minor comments, overall LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10092#issuecomment-161372323
@mateiz Thank you for your answer! Will try to do it soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10105#issuecomment-161381057
**[Test build #47075 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47075/consoleFull)**
for PR 10105 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10083#discussion_r46451156
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/GenericAvroSerializer.scala ---
@@ -81,7 +81,10 @@ private[serializer] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#issuecomment-161388326
**[Test build #47073 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47073/consoleFull)**
for PR 8066 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8066#issuecomment-161388547
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10106
[SPARK-12040][PYSPARK][MLLIB] add toJson & fromJson to Vectors in PySpark
Add toJson/fromJson to Vectors for PySpark, please refer the Scala one
SPARK-11766.
You can merge this pull request into
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9963#discussion_r46458512
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -168,6 +178,13 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10106#issuecomment-161399622
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9963#discussion_r46458391
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -341,6 +341,24 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8744#issuecomment-161402743
**[Test build #47080 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47080/consoleFull)**
for PR 8744 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9867#discussion_r46461693
--- Diff: dev/lint-java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
1 - 100 of 663 matches
Mail list logo
