Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11075#issuecomment-180140728
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10942#discussion_r51967979
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -251,6 +262,69 @@ private[sql] object DataSourceSt
GitHub user jodersky opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085
[SPARK-13171] [Core] Replace future calls with Future
Trivial search-and-replace to eliminate deprecation warnings in Scala 2.11.
Also works with 2.10
You can merge this pull request into a Gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180155348
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10942#discussion_r51968284
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -251,6 +262,69 @@ private[sql] object DataSo
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#issuecomment-180158612
How long is it going to take to implement caching? I'd rather measure the
performance of this implementation before we start optimizing.
---
If your project is set u
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180162600
Some files in this PR are not covered by #11067
@holdenk
I can base my PR on yours.
Let me know what you think.
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180162653
**[Test build #2520 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2520/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
[`189e169`](https://g
GitHub user bomeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086
[SPARK-13145] [SQL] checkAnswer in SQL query suites should tolerate small
float number error
checkAnswer will report error for small difference caused by float / double
numbers.
for example, in
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180162970
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180163095
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180163281
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086#issuecomment-180163514
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180163474
**[Test build #50790 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50790/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
[`a649ac9`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#discussion_r51970296
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -337,8 +337,12 @@ private[sql] abstract class SparkStrategies
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180163623
I'd probably just wait for the streaming PR to also get merged in - makes
it simpler.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11075#issuecomment-180164679
@lresende thanks for doing this. Please merge the relevant pull requests
into a single one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11077#issuecomment-180164835
@lresende thanks for doing this. Please merge the relevant pull requests
into a single one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11076#issuecomment-180164934
@lresende thanks for doing this. Please merge the relevant pull requests
into a single one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11074#issuecomment-180164807
@lresende thanks for doing this. Please merge the relevant pull requests
into a single one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10942#issuecomment-180165062
Thanks - merging this in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10942
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180165728
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180165727
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180166025
**[Test build #50791 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50791/consoleFull)**
for PR 11085 at commit
[`e7bfb13`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180166319
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180166322
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#discussion_r51971305
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -337,8 +337,12 @@ private[sql] abstract class SparkStrategies
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#discussion_r51971509
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundatio
GitHub user shoelsch opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11087
[SPARK-13179] [Python] Fix PySpark Row name collision 'count'
Override PySpark Row inherited count method to instead get "count" column
name.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11087#issuecomment-180167306
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088
[SPARK-13207] [SQL] Make partitioning discovery ignore _SUCCESS files.
If a _SUCCESS appears in the inner partitioning dir, partition discovery
will treat that _SUCCESS file as a data file. Then, par
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#issuecomment-180167868
> How long is it going to take to implement caching? I'd rather measure the
performance of this implementation before we start optimizing.
Not a lot of work, ac
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180170445
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180170448
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180170441
**[Test build #50791 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50791/consoleFull)**
for PR 11085 at commit
[`e7bfb13`](https://g
Github user carsonwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#discussion_r51972422
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -55,10 +56,19 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
// thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-180172204
**[Test build #50793 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50793/consoleFull)**
for PR 11088 at commit
[`0437dbd`](https://gi
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180172718
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user carsonwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180172808
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180172844
**[Test build #50794 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50794/consoleFull)**
for PR 11071 at commit
[`72b31c8`](https://gi
GitHub user jodersky opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11089
Replace use of Pairs with Tuple2s
Another trivial deprecation fix for Scala 2.11
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jodersky/spark
Github user jodersky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11089#issuecomment-180173250
jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11089#issuecomment-180173597
**[Test build #50795 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50795/consoleFull)**
for PR 11089 at commit
[`aa00bfe`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180173593
**[Test build #50796 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50796/consoleFull)**
for PR 11082 at commit
[`ebf3509`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180173779
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180173772
**[Test build #50796 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50796/consoleFull)**
for PR 11082 at commit
[`ebf3509`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180173777
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user jodersky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180173846
retest please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10876#issuecomment-180175154
ping @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180175835
**[Test build #50797 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50797/consoleFull)**
for PR 11071 at commit
[`72b31c8`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11089#issuecomment-180176498
**[Test build #50798 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50798/consoleFull)**
for PR 11089 at commit
[`aa00bfe`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#discussion_r51973696
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -337,8 +337,12 @@ private[sql] abstract class SparkStrategies
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180179325
**[Test build #50799 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50799/consoleFull)**
for PR 11085 at commit
[`40fe8a4`](https://gi
Github user jayadevanmurali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#discussion_r51973903
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -1291,4 +1291,14 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
S
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180179916
**[Test build #2520 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2520/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
[`189e169`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180180244
**[Test build #50790 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50790/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
[`a649ac9`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180180371
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180181416
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-180180374
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11066#issuecomment-180183376
@hvanhovell
What do you think ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180183717
**[Test build #50800 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50800/consoleFull)**
for PR 11082 at commit
[`74a4c70`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086#issuecomment-180188439
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-180188560
**[Test build #50793 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50793/consoleFull)**
for PR 11088 at commit
[`0437dbd`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-180188790
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-180188792
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user ygcao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-180188955
coolï¼Thanks. It will be helpful to see the large scale test result.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11084#discussion_r51976383
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/SQLBuilder.scala ---
@@ -142,7 +142,15 @@ class SQLBuilder(logicalPlan: LogicalPlan, sqlContext
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180191627
**[Test build #50794 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50794/consoleFull)**
for PR 11071 at commit
[`72b31c8`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180192869
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180192861
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11084#issuecomment-180195917
One minor issue, overall looks good. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11050#discussion_r51977477
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -413,9 +413,11 @@ class Analyzer(
case
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11050#discussion_r51977520
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -114,16 +117,21 @@ abstract class Attribute
Github user mariobriggs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11022#issuecomment-180197636
thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11050#discussion_r51977612
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -114,16 +117,21 @@ abstract class Attribute
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11050#discussion_r51977660
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -197,7 +209,8 @@ case class AttributeReferen
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180199036
**[Test build #50797 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50797/consoleFull)**
for PR 11071 at commit
[`72b31c8`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180199780
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180199774
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180200750
transient is wrong for a static member. What are you trying to do, avoid a
large cache? There are ways to do this but its not this. but how many timezones
could there be
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180201265
The map key could be like "UTC+01:00". "American/Los Angeles", "PST", etc.,
they are already cached in `getTimeZone`, but the method itself is a
synchronized one.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180201649
**[Test build #50799 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50799/consoleFull)**
for PR 11085 at commit
[`40fe8a4`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180202098
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180202103
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10876#issuecomment-180202630
@yanboliang I'm sorry that I didn't make it clear: It's good to have a
simple test, that could also be used as an example to demo how to use these
functions (it should b
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180206653
**[Test build #50800 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50800/consoleFull)**
for PR 11082 at commit
[`74a4c70`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180206889
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180206885
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user carsonwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11071#issuecomment-180207538
I have a sub query like this `SELECT a, b, c FROM table UV WHERE
(datediff(UV.visitDate, '1997-01-01')>=0 AND datediff(UV.visitDate,
'2015-01-01')<=0)) `
When p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11089#issuecomment-180208048
**[Test build #50795 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50795/consoleFull)**
for PR 11089 at commit
[`aa00bfe`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11089#issuecomment-180208171
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11089#issuecomment-180208172
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180208925
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11050#discussion_r51980394
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -114,16 +117,21 @@ abstract class Attribute
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11084#discussion_r51980826
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/SQLBuilder.scala ---
@@ -142,7 +142,15 @@ class SQLBuilder(logicalPlan: LogicalPlan, sqlContex
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180215670
**[Test build #50801 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50801/consoleFull)**
for PR 11082 at commit
[`879eebe`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11089#issuecomment-180216713
**[Test build #50798 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50798/consoleFull)**
for PR 11089 at commit
[`aa00bfe`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11089#issuecomment-180216867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11089#issuecomment-180216864
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
401 - 500 of 550 matches
Mail list logo
