Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#issuecomment-180568890
**[Test build #50844 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50844/consoleFull)**
for PR 7334 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11096#issuecomment-180571977
Merging to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11096#issuecomment-180571853
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11095#issuecomment-180580403
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11095#issuecomment-180580393
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user lresende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-180593895
Thanks @shaneknapp , I'll refrain the final say on the downtime to others
on the PMC ( @JoshRosen and others)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086#discussion_r52081122
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -350,6 +350,9 @@ object QueryTest {
Row.fromSeq(row.toSeq.map {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11055#discussion_r52081720
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -345,6 +345,14 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
defaultValue =
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10852#issuecomment-180601920
Thanks, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jodersky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180604528
I rebased on master and ran local tests successfully
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r52082733
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -55,9 +59,89 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user jodersky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180604643
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r52082979
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -55,9 +59,89 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r52083030
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -150,36 +205,40 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086#discussion_r52083022
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -350,6 +350,9 @@ object QueryTest {
Row.fromSeq(row.toSeq.map {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086#discussion_r52082988
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -350,6 +350,9 @@ object QueryTest {
Row.fromSeq(row.toSeq.map {
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r52083110
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -198,14 +257,46 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180608176
**[Test build #50846 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50846/consoleFull)**
for PR 11085 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r52083507
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -185,6 +185,17 @@ final class DataFrameWriter private[sql](df:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#issuecomment-180608495
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#issuecomment-180608496
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#discussion_r52083903
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11097#issuecomment-180610270
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r52084635
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -150,36 +205,40 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086#discussion_r52084984
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -350,6 +350,9 @@ object QueryTest {
Row.fromSeq(row.toSeq.map {
Github user ted-yu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11082#issuecomment-180616613
There is no error in DirectKafkaStreamSuite.scala
Once [~holdenk]'s PR goes in, I will rebase.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-180702413
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086#discussion_r52098701
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -350,6 +350,9 @@ object QueryTest {
Row.fromSeq(row.toSeq.map {
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10917#discussion_r52098713
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/HashBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -87,18 +92,39 @@ object HashBenchmark {
.add("binary",
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11101#issuecomment-180703558
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-180703524
**[Test build #50864 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50864/consoleFull)**
for PR 11035 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11101#issuecomment-180703559
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11101#issuecomment-180703548
**[Test build #50863 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50863/consoleFull)**
for PR 11101 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11018#discussion_r52098786
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Benchmark.scala ---
@@ -59,17 +60,21 @@ private[spark] class Benchmark(
}
println
Github user bomeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086#discussion_r52098824
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryTest.scala ---
@@ -350,6 +350,9 @@ object QueryTest {
Row.fromSeq(row.toSeq.map {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11099#issuecomment-180708243
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11099#issuecomment-180708244
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-180714059
**[Test build #50864 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50864/consoleFull)**
for PR 11035 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-180714098
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10780#issuecomment-180394348
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047#issuecomment-180439396
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-180388822
**[Test build #50818 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50818/consoleFull)**
for PR 10427 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10780#issuecomment-180394345
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11053#issuecomment-180424657
**[Test build #50824 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50824/consoleFull)**
for PR 11053 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-180390375
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-180390376
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-180390371
**[Test build #50822 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50822/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047#issuecomment-180428691
**[Test build #50820 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50820/consoleFull)**
for PR 11047 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-180390047
**[Test build #50822 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50822/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047#issuecomment-180390254
**[Test build #50821 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50821/consoleFull)**
for PR 11047 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10780#issuecomment-180394001
**[Test build #50815 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50815/consoleFull)**
for PR 10780 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11053#issuecomment-180426806
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11053#issuecomment-180426788
**[Test build #50824 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50824/consoleFull)**
for PR 11053 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047#issuecomment-180428972
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11047#issuecomment-180439401
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10874#issuecomment-180392174
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10874#issuecomment-180397780
**[Test build #50823 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50823/consoleFull)**
for PR 10874 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11053#issuecomment-180426811
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11044#issuecomment-180395685
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-180714099
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10780#discussion_r52047530
--- Diff: network/yarn/pom.xml ---
@@ -96,6 +113,61 @@
+
+
+
+
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#discussion_r52056901
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11093#issuecomment-180506266
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180510322
**[Test build #50833 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50833/consoleFull)**
for PR 10993 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#discussion_r52060863
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/FileStreamSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11085#issuecomment-180511262
**[Test build #50829 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50829/consoleFull)**
for PR 11085 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11093#issuecomment-180510996
**[Test build #50832 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50832/consoleFull)**
for PR 11093 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#issuecomment-180511006
**[Test build #50830 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50830/consoleFull)**
for PR 11034 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11022#issuecomment-180472783
> Not an issue so much as the person must be in the Contributor role. (Are
you an admin? You can edit this). Done
The Contributor role was full when I tried
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-180480810
LGTM, just one minor comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user lresende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11092
[SPARK-13189] Cleanup build references to Scala 2.10
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/lresende/spark SPARK-13189
Github user lresende closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11077
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7334#discussion_r52056035
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/limit.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180505172
Yeah @mgummelt we have lots of those. Welcome to Spark :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user anabranch opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11093
update documentation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/anabranch/spark master
Alternatively you can review and apply these
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11067#discussion_r52059943
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/MasterFailureTest.scala ---
@@ -215,8 +216,8 @@ object MasterFailureTest extends Logging {
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#issuecomment-180506306
Changes to this PR:
1. Add a HashMap batchToMetadata to store the metadata in memory so that we
don't need to read metadata files in `getNextBatch`
2. Load
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#discussion_r52060451
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -195,6 +196,35 @@ trait HadoopFsRelationProvider {
}
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r52060520
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -55,9 +59,88 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10780#discussion_r52047310
--- Diff: network/yarn/pom.xml ---
@@ -86,6 +94,15 @@
+
+
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11053#issuecomment-180478941
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11053#issuecomment-180478946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sethah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-180478448
ping! @yanboliang @jkbradley
This is a small change that will allow the Python API to match the Scala
API, where the current behavior could be reasonably
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11053#issuecomment-180478503
**[Test build #50825 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50825/consoleFull)**
for PR 11053 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-180485241
@davies Thanks for taking a look! I have addressed your comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-180494282
**[Test build #50826 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50826/consoleFull)**
for PR 10962 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-180494296
**[Test build #2521 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2521/consoleFull)**
for PR 10962 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11066#issuecomment-180500926
**[Test build #50827 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50827/consoleFull)**
for PR 11066 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#issuecomment-180500710
**[Test build #50828 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50828/consoleFull)**
for PR 11034 at commit
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r52059914
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -373,40 +451,25 @@ private[spark] class
Github user mgummelt commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-180508893
@andrewor14 Glad to be here! Flaky tests or no
I think all concerns have been addressed except for dynamic allocation
testing, which seems to be broken
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#discussion_r52052341
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -156,9 +156,16 @@ def hasParam(self, paramName):
"""
Tests whether this
Github user lresende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11075#issuecomment-180486122
@rxin this is now merged into #11092
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user lresende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11076#issuecomment-180486204
@rxin this is now merged into #11092
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user lresende closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11074
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user lresende closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11076
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user lresende closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11075
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user lresende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11077#issuecomment-180486261
@rxin this is now merged into #11092
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-180499905
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 424 matches
Mail list logo
