Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11696#issuecomment-196372864
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-196383174
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-196383179
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-196388789
**[Test build #53073 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53073/consoleFull)**
for PR 11632 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11581#discussion_r56012675
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeModels.scala ---
@@ -101,3 +109,127 @@ private[ml] trait TreeEnsembleModel {
/** Total
Github user bjornjon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11695#issuecomment-196373173
Read through all the code in common. No similar oversights, at least not
with variable naming.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-196399772
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-196399775
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11667#discussion_r56033218
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkQl.scala ---
@@ -36,6 +36,18 @@ private[sql] class SparkQl(conf: ParserConf =
Github user brkyvz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11687#issuecomment-196368160
I'm so happy this issue is finally resolved on the Py4j side. Thanks
@JoshRosen for the update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11667#discussion_r56034392
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkQl.scala ---
@@ -36,6 +36,18 @@ private[sql] class SparkQl(conf: ParserConf =
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11667#issuecomment-196409943
LGTM. I am merging this to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11696#issuecomment-196374253
**[Test build #53075 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53075/consoleFull)**
for PR 11696 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-196389294
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-196389286
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11667#issuecomment-196398831
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-196399588
**[Test build #53077 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53077/consoleFull)**
for PR 11663 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-196374260
**[Test build #53076 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53076/consoleFull)**
for PR 11663 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11690#discussion_r56025350
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -117,6 +119,25 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-196388562
**[Test build #53077 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53077/consoleFull)**
for PR 11663 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11682#issuecomment-196388382
@yhuai This was added in the recent change in `ColumnPruning`. 1.6 does not
have such an issue. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11663#issuecomment-196383071
**[Test build #53076 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53076/consoleFull)**
for PR 11663 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11693#discussion_r56023939
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -152,13 +152,14 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11691#issuecomment-196368073
@viirya I am not sure if we should add these Constraints now. These
constraints are intentionally excluded from the original design for simplicity,
I think.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11687#issuecomment-196371792
**[Test build #53074 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53074/consoleFull)**
for PR 11687 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11581#discussion_r56014633
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Impurity.scala ---
@@ -179,3 +179,21 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11088#issuecomment-196382081
Thanks. I am merging this to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11688#issuecomment-196382153
@mccheah I am all on-board with adding a better
`collect_list`/`collect_set` implementation. I have submitted a similar PR
recently (using mutable `ArrayData`
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11690#discussion_r56028909
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -117,6 +119,25 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11581#discussion_r56012073
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeModels.scala ---
@@ -101,3 +109,127 @@ private[ml] trait TreeEnsembleModel {
/** Total
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11682#issuecomment-196380248
@gatorsmile Is this behavior new (introduced by a recent change) or
previous versions of the optimizer also have the same behavior?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11550#issuecomment-196164331
**[Test build #53049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53049/consoleFull)**
for PR 11550 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#discussion_r55959787
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -598,50 +598,44 @@ object NullPropagation
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11647#discussion_r55959825
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Expression.scala
---
@@ -598,3 +601,61 @@ abstract class TernaryExpression
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11689#issuecomment-196172202
**[Test build #2632 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2632/consoleFull)**
for PR 11689 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-196175359
**[Test build #53047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53047/consoleFull)**
for PR 11672 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11690#issuecomment-196177615
**[Test build #53052 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53052/consoleFull)**
for PR 11690 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11690#issuecomment-196177695
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11457#discussion_r55959195
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_context.R ---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ test_that("Check masked functions", {
maskedBySparkR <-
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#discussion_r55959538
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -598,50 +598,44 @@ object NullPropagation
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#discussion_r55959514
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -598,50 +598,44 @@ object NullPropagation extends
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#discussion_r55959492
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -598,50 +598,44 @@ object NullPropagation
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11647#issuecomment-196165607
Thanks for reviewing this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11690#issuecomment-196173881
**[Test build #53052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53052/consoleFull)**
for PR 11690 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11550#issuecomment-196165084
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#discussion_r55959924
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -418,6 +419,13 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11512#issuecomment-196165073
Sure, thanks @tgravescs and @vanzin for your comments. I will close this
create new PRs accordingly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user jerryshao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11512
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11647#issuecomment-196165006
Thanks - I will let @marmbrus do the final review & merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11550#issuecomment-196165085
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11550#issuecomment-196165079
**[Test build #53049 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53049/consoleFull)**
for PR 11550 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#discussion_r55960289
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -598,50 +598,44 @@ object NullPropagation extends
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#discussion_r55959308
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -598,50 +598,44 @@ object NullPropagation
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#discussion_r55959595
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -598,50 +598,44 @@ object NullPropagation extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11687#issuecomment-196162913
**[Test build #53048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53048/consoleFull)**
for PR 11687 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11687#issuecomment-196162975
@zsxwing, updated, please take another look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11647#issuecomment-196165179
**[Test build #53050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53050/consoleFull)**
for PR 11647 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#discussion_r55960189
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -418,6 +419,13 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-196169183
**[Test build #53051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53051/consoleFull)**
for PR 11665 at commit
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11690
[SPARK-13642][Yarn][1.6-backport] Properly handle signal kill in
ApplicationMaster
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch is fixing the race condition in
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11635#issuecomment-196175530
**[Test build #53053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53053/consoleFull)**
for PR 11635 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-196175510
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-196175509
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11550#issuecomment-196177864
**[Test build #53054 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53054/consoleFull)**
for PR 11550 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55964768
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,57 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55964808
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,57 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-196188463
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553#discussion_r55964780
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -49,6 +49,20 @@ private[feature] trait QuantileDiscretizerBase
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-196188375
**[Test build #53056 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53056/consoleFull)**
for PR 11632 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11691#issuecomment-196194355
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11687#issuecomment-196195679
**[Test build #53048 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53048/consoleFull)**
for PR 11687 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11687#issuecomment-196196387
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r55966718
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -30,11 +33,13 @@ class KMeansSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-196203085
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-196203080
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11692#issuecomment-196208979
**[Test build #53060 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53060/consoleFull)**
for PR 11692 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11692#issuecomment-196209090
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11692#issuecomment-196209091
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11694#issuecomment-196223237
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11694#issuecomment-196223229
**[Test build #53066 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53066/consoleFull)**
for PR 11694 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11694#issuecomment-196223240
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11690#issuecomment-196177696
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55963818
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,57 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553#discussion_r55963977
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -49,6 +49,20 @@ private[feature] trait QuantileDiscretizerBase
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55964546
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,57 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11658#issuecomment-196190307
**[Test build #53058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53058/consoleFull)**
for PR 11658 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-196190295
**[Test build #53057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53057/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11693
[SPARK-13642][Yarn] Changed the default application exit state to failed
for yarn cluster mode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Changing the default exit state to
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11692#discussion_r55970249
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -976,6 +976,11 @@ private[spark] class Client(
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11689#issuecomment-196213887
Thank you, @srowen . :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11550#issuecomment-196215658
**[Test build #53065 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53065/consoleFull)**
for PR 11550 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11693#issuecomment-196215740
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11693#issuecomment-196215608
**[Test build #53062 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53062/consoleFull)**
for PR 11693 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11693#issuecomment-196215735
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11694#issuecomment-196222428
**[Test build #53066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53066/consoleFull)**
for PR 11694 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-196231223
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11692#discussion_r55976051
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -976,6 +976,11 @@ private[spark] class Client(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11632#issuecomment-196230940
**[Test build #53056 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53056/consoleFull)**
for PR 11632 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55963496
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,57 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
1 - 100 of 883 matches
Mail list logo
