Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-219840630
@mateiz @markhamstra @kayousterhout I've updated this to avoid changing the
scheduler at all, and instead just run the mock backend in another thread. It
slightly
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219840643
**[Test build #58714 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58714/consoleFull)**
for PR 13151 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219840935
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219840938
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-219841050
**[Test build #58712 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58712/consoleFull)**
for PR 8559 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-219841370
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-219841367
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13149#discussion_r63598420
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -206,11 +212,21 @@ object KMeansModel extends MLReadable[KMeansModel] {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13149#discussion_r63598417
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -206,11 +212,21 @@ object KMeansModel extends MLReadable[KMeansModel] {
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13149#issuecomment-219845117
Thanks! I should have done this before.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219845984
**[Test build #58719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58719/consoleFull)**
for PR 13151 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13120#discussion_r63599112
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -348,13 +349,23 @@ object
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13148#issuecomment-219846049
I'll take a look now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219847988
**[Test build #58716 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58716/consoleFull)**
for PR 13153 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219848240
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219848242
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13148#issuecomment-219848715
That's the only issue I saw. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13148#discussion_r63600571
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/BisectingKMeans.scala ---
@@ -39,23 +39,27 @@ private[clustering] trait
Github user tejasapatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12194#issuecomment-219853586
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13120#discussion_r63603796
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -451,13 +462,15 @@ object
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13120#discussion_r63604166
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -348,13 +349,23 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12194#issuecomment-219854345
**[Test build #58720 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58720/consoleFull)**
for PR 12194 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7075#issuecomment-219855097
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7075#issuecomment-219854991
[Test build #58715 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58715/console)
for PR 7075 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7075#issuecomment-219855099
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user frreiss opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155
[SPARK-15370] [SQL] Update RewriteCorrelatedScalarSubquery rule to fix
COUNT bug
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request fixes the COUNT bug in the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#issuecomment-21986
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13120#discussion_r63605320
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -348,13 +349,23 @@ object
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13120#discussion_r63605497
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -451,13 +462,15 @@ object
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13089#issuecomment-219859010
Is this PR a mistake (with no title, linked JIRA, description)? Can you
please close this issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154#issuecomment-219859386
**[Test build #2988 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2988/consoleFull)**
for PR 13154 at commit
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#discussion_r63608338
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystTypeConverters.scala
---
@@ -321,11 +323,13 @@ object CatalystTypeConverters
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154#issuecomment-219861724
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154#issuecomment-219861586
**[Test build #2989 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2989/consoleFull)**
for PR 13154 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219862158
**[Test build #58721 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58721/consoleFull)**
for PR 10125 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-219864350
Rebased to resolve conflicts.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-219864486
**[Test build #58722 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58722/consoleFull)**
for PR 12719 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12194#issuecomment-219865022
**[Test build #58720 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58720/consoleFull)**
for PR 12194 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12194#issuecomment-219865151
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12194#issuecomment-219865153
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219865688
**[Test build #58723 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58723/consoleFull)**
for PR 10125 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154#issuecomment-219866146
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-219866605
**[Test build #58722 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58722/consoleFull)**
for PR 12719 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-219866627
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-219866626
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219866811
**[Test build #58724 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58724/consoleFull)**
for PR 10125 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156
[SPARK-15367] [SQL] Add refreshTable back
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`refreshTable` was a method in `HiveContext`. It was deleted accidentally
while we were
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-219869025
**[Test build #58725 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58725/consoleFull)**
for PR 13156 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#discussion_r63613130
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -294,6 +294,18 @@ class SQLContext private[sql](
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#discussion_r63613203
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MultiDatabaseSuite.scala ---
@@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ class MultiDatabaseSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219869751
**[Test build #58718 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58718/consoleFull)**
for PR 13153 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219870036
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219870033
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219870943
cc @andrewor14 @yhuai @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#discussion_r63615033
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -294,6 +294,18 @@ class SQLContext private[sql](
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#discussion_r63615059
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MultiDatabaseSuite.scala ---
@@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ class MultiDatabaseSuite extends QueryTest
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219874320
**[Test build #58719 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58719/consoleFull)**
for PR 13151 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219874517
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219874513
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#issuecomment-219876620
@MLnick Yes. It seems `threshold` and `thresholds` are set exclusively via
`set..` methods but in Python both can be set via `fit` method.
---
If your project is
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219877343
Maybe also put the size comparison in the description?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13079#issuecomment-219878464
LGTM. I am merging this to master and 2.0. Let's change the error message
and exception class in a separate pr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13079#discussion_r63618404
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -626,40 +626,142 @@ case class ShowCreateTableCommand(table:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13079
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ajbozarth commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13037#issuecomment-219881338
@srowen @andrewor14 I agree that though is not the last straw, the
vertically growing list is a issue. I'll throw a fix together with a table view
and post a screen
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-219881850
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13079#discussion_r63620803
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -200,6 +207,7 @@ case class SimpleCatalogRelation(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-219882335
**[Test build #58726 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58726/consoleFull)**
for PR 12719 at commit
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13157
[SPARK-14346] Fix scala-2.10 build
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Scala 2.10 build was broken by
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13079/files. I am reverting the change
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13157#issuecomment-219883173
**[Test build #58727 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58727/consoleFull)**
for PR 13157 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154#issuecomment-219884470
**[Test build #2989 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2989/consoleFull)**
for PR 13154 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219885069
**[Test build #58721 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58721/consoleFull)**
for PR 10125 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219885198
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219885199
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13157#issuecomment-219885469
tested locally. The fix is good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-219886108
**[Test build #58725 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58725/consoleFull)**
for PR 13156 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-219886323
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-219886319
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219888573
**[Test build #58723 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58723/consoleFull)**
for PR 10125 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219888571
**[Test build #58724 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58724/consoleFull)**
for PR 10125 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219888687
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219888690
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219888714
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219888712
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146#discussion_r63625742
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ class SparkConf(loadDefaults: Boolean) extends Cloneable
with Logging {
Github user zjffdu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146#issuecomment-219890162
@BryanCutler Thanks for review. The reason I create this ticket is that it
is not convenient for user to specify environment variable especially when user
want to
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12000#issuecomment-219890576
I'm on vacation right now. This patch seems pretty small and reasonable to
me, though, so it would be great if someone else could take a final look and
merge if
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r63626483
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SubquerySuite.scala
---
@@ -293,4 +293,65 @@ class SubquerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r63626503
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SubquerySuite.scala
---
@@ -293,4 +293,65 @@ class SubquerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13150#discussion_r63626710
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreRelation.scala ---
@@ -114,17 +115,27 @@ private[hive] case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13150#discussion_r63626678
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreRelation.scala ---
@@ -114,17 +115,27 @@ private[hive] case class
Github user Parth-Brahmbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13150#discussion_r63627480
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreRelation.scala ---
@@ -114,17 +115,27 @@ private[hive] case class
Github user Parth-Brahmbhatt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13150#discussion_r63627565
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreRelation.scala ---
@@ -114,17 +115,27 @@ private[hive] case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13150#discussion_r63628099
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreRelation.scala ---
@@ -114,17 +115,27 @@ private[hive] case class
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13158
[SPARK-15373][WEB UI] Spark UI should show consistent timezones.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, SparkUI shows two timezones in a single page when the
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13159#issuecomment-219893757
cc @MLnick @holdenk
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user BryanCutler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13159
[DOC][MINOR] ml.feature Scala and Python API sync
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I reviewed Scala and Python APIs for ml.feature and corrected discrepancies.
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13158#issuecomment-219893875
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13159#issuecomment-219893986
**[Test build #58728 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58728/consoleFull)**
for PR 13159 at commit
401 - 500 of 586 matches
Mail list logo
