Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14093
**[Test build #61916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61916/consoleFull)**
for PR 14093 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14081
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14081
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61922/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61919/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14092
**[Test build #3169 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3169/consoleFull)**
for PR 14092 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14092
**[Test build #3168 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3168/consoleFull)**
for PR 14092 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14090#discussion_r69955401
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -306,6 +306,64 @@ head(ldf, 3)
{% endhighlight %}
+ Run a given function on a large dataset
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61917/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #61917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61917/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61921/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13765#discussion_r69963613
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/dsl/package.scala ---
@@ -370,8 +370,11 @@ package object dsl {
case
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14083
**[Test build #61923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61923/consoleFull)**
for PR 14083 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14092
Ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894
**[Test build #61921 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61921/consoleFull)**
for PR 13894 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956
**[Test build #61919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61919/consoleFull)**
for PR 11956 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61920/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14022
**[Test build #61924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61924/consoleFull)**
for PR 14022 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030#discussion_r69855673
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ private[sql] object Dataset {
class Dataset[T] private[sql](
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030#discussion_r69855749
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/ForeachSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -35,35 +35,109 @@ class ForeachSinkSuite extends
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030#discussion_r69855731
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/ForeachSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -35,35 +35,109 @@ class ForeachSinkSuite extends
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14083
I've got another idea (orthogonal to this). Thank you, @hvanhovell .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
JavaReflectMethod isn't the best, but calling it Reflect is pretty bad
because there are many "Reflect" classes in various libraries -- just within
Spark dependencies there are 3 classes called
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Thank you for review, @cloud-fan .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69856801
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +654,145 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
**[Test build #61896 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61896/consoleFull)**
for PR 14065 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
**[Test build #61897 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61897/consoleFull)**
for PR 13876 at commit
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r69856576
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/JavaMethodReflectSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004#discussion_r69857049
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/regexpExpressions.scala
---
@@ -198,6 +203,66 @@ case class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004#discussion_r69857442
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/regexpExpressions.scala
---
@@ -198,6 +203,66 @@ case class
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69857849
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +654,160 @@ case class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876#discussion_r69854777
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -820,16 +820,24 @@ object ConstantFolding
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876#discussion_r69855334
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -820,16 +820,24 @@ object ConstantFolding
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69855302
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +654,160 @@ case class
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876#discussion_r69855189
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -820,16 +820,24 @@ object ConstantFolding extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
**[Test build #61893 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61893/consoleFull)**
for PR 14030 at commit
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69855494
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +654,145 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r69857166
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/JavaMethodReflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user janplus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008#discussion_r69857153
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +654,145 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030#discussion_r69855694
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/ForeachSink.scala
---
@@ -30,7 +32,42 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.{DataFrame,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
**[Test build #61898 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61898/consoleFull)**
for PR 13876 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61893/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030#discussion_r69856084
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/ForeachSink.scala
---
@@ -30,7 +32,42 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.{DataFrame,
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14047
Merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14084
**[Test build #61894 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61894/consoleFull)**
for PR 14084 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14085
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user zenglinxi0615 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14085
[SPARK-16408][SQL] SparkSQL Added file get Exception: is a directory â¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is for adding an parameter (spark.input.dir.recursive)
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14081#discussion_r69862983
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/ml/gaussian_mixture_example.py ---
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
if __name__ == "__main__":
spark = SparkSession\
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
**[Test build #61902 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61902/consoleFull)**
for PR 14045 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
**[Test build #61903 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61903/consoleFull)**
for PR 13778 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14068
I don't think this is trivial. You also need to explain the change in more
detail.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14030
Updated. @zsxwing could you take another look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61896/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #61906 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61906/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
@cloud-fan thanks. I have rebased it to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14086
[SPARK-16410][SQL] Support `truncate` option in Overwrite mode for JDBC
DataFrameWriter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a boolean option,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14086
**[Test build #61907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61907/consoleFull)**
for PR 14086 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61899/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61899 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61899/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494#discussion_r69860765
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1689,4 +1689,76 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778#discussion_r69863023
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -374,13 +407,15 @@ object MapObjects {
*
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14081#discussion_r69863695
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaPipelineExample.java ---
@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user zenglinxi0615 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14085#discussion_r69864435
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -113,8 +113,9 @@ case class AddFile(path: String) extends
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
> It sounds like the invalid rows will still be filtered out during column
assembly even if we are unable to prune any row group. If so, counting number
of rows does not help us determine how many
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61897/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
**[Test build #61897 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61897/consoleFull)**
for PR 13876 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
**[Test build #61896 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61896/consoleFull)**
for PR 14065 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13861
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
**[Test build #61898 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61898/consoleFull)**
for PR 13876 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61898/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
There is one failure in `HiveSparkSubmitSuite`. It seems to be irrelevant.
I'll retry the test.
```
- SPARK-8020: set sql conf in spark conf *** FAILED *** (31 seconds, 981
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
**[Test build #61900 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61900/consoleFull)**
for PR 14045 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14084
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13876
**[Test build #61901 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61901/consoleFull)**
for PR 13876 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14084
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61894/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
**[Test build #61904 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61904/consoleFull)**
for PR 13701 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14085#discussion_r69863303
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -113,8 +113,9 @@ case class AddFile(path: String) extends
Github user zenglinxi0615 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14085#discussion_r69865365
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -113,8 +113,9 @@ case class AddFile(path: String) extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61895/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
Alright - I've updated it. The expression is now called Reflect, and it
prints different messages depending on whether it is a class not found or a
method not found.
---
If your project is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13861
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080
Can you update to the title to just say "[SPARK-16405] Add metrics and
source for external shuffle service"?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14047
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61895 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61895/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61905/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14004
**[Test build #61899 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61899/consoleFull)**
for PR 14004 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14089
[SPARK-16415][SQL] fix catalog string error
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In #13537 we truncate `simpleString` if it is a long `StructType`. But
sometimes we
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13894#discussion_r69892610
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -56,7 +56,10 @@ private[ml] trait CrossValidatorParams extends
101 - 200 of 591 matches
Mail list logo
