Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84590664
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84590948
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84591160
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1342,6 +1342,20 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84591185
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1342,6 +1342,20 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84591178
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1342,6 +1342,20 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84591169
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1342,6 +1342,20 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
I think we can merge this one first, since it is no worse than the Hive
one. Then we can think about how to make it more robust.
cc @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575
LGTM too. Unforunately my internet sucks (on a plane) and I can't merge
this right now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
@marmbrus Sure (I didn't mean I am not going to do this..), I just handled
the case in this PR for `to_json`.
BTW, I would like to note that there are the same problems in other JSON
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67407 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67407/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67407/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
[SPARK-17123][SQL][BRANCH-2.0] Use type-widened encoder for DataFrame for
set operations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR backports
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67413/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user CodingCat opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
[SPARK-18058][SQL] [BACKPORT-2.0]Comparing column types ignoring
Nullability in Union and SetOperation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR tries to fix
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595#discussion_r84600741
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -377,4 +377,23 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603
**[Test build #67420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67420/consoleFull)**
for PR 15603 at commit
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15603
[WEBUI][MINOR] Return types in methods + cleanup
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The main purpose of the change is to discuss the purpose of `SparkUITab`
class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67419/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13252
**[Test build #67421 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67421/consoleFull)**
for PR 13252 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15484
**[Test build #67405 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67405/consoleFull)**
for PR 15484 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15484
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67405/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84590702
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15484
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84590685
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/functions.scala
---
@@ -125,7 +129,7 @@ case class DescribeFunctionCommand(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84591073
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -250,24 +251,26 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67407/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67408 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67408/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67408/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
**[Test build #67411 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67411/consoleFull)**
for PR 15513 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
sure, doing that now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
@CodingCat could you open a backport for branch-2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15589
merged to branch-2.0 and then cherry-picked to master for the error message
fix not in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
LGTM - pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yinxusen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9
How about the following:
1. Since the new generated model is derived from an estimator, the model
should have the same params as its parent estimator. That's why there is no
need to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67418/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
**[Test build #67418 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67418/consoleFull)**
for PR 15541 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
It is relatively straight forward to test `ImperativeAggregate`s. See:
-
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.aggregate.HyperLogLogPlusPlusSuite
-
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
Just saw that this got merged. I had a tiny nit but its ok without it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595#discussion_r84600424
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -377,4 +377,23 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15596
@JoshRosen could you shed some light on why we are not using the regular
`EnsureRequirements` based code path for `CollectLimitExec`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67417/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
**[Test build #67417 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67417/consoleFull)**
for PR 15441 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441#discussion_r84599733
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UISeleniumSuite.scala ---
@@ -651,6 +671,15 @@ class UISeleniumSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
**[Test build #67417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67417/consoleFull)**
for PR 15441 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
**[Test build #67418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67418/consoleFull)**
for PR 15541 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
**[Test build #67419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67419/consoleFull)**
for PR 15602 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
**[Test build #67419 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67419/consoleFull)**
for PR 15602 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
Merging to branch-2.0. Thanks! Can you close this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user CodingCat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15602
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
@srowen This is explicitly supports maven.test.skip=true - the rationale
for using it can be project specific (generating clean builds for various
profile combinations, internal release builds from
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84591137
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1342,6 +1342,20 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
**[Test build #67410 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67410/consoleFull)**
for PR 14957 at commit
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592821
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592818
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84592816
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84590773
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jodersky commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513
@HyukjinKwon (posting here to sum up the inline discussion)
I looked through the way the final description string is created before
printing, and it looks like the formatting will actually play
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67406/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
(Actually I'm on an airplane and the internet is not good enough to merge
patches).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
cc @cloud-fan can you merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67408 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67408/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67409 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67409/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15599
I think we don't know exactly what the real exception is. The NPE occurs
while handling the exception.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
**[Test build #67414 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67414/consoleFull)**
for PR 15413 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67414/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
**[Test build #67413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67413/consoleFull)**
for PR 15601 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
**[Test build #67409 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67409/consoleFull)**
for PR 15354 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
Merging to master. Thanks! Ping me for the follow-up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
**[Test build #67410 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67410/consoleFull)**
for PR 14957 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
For development time, use an IDE or maybe SBT to do incremental
compilation, which is even faster. I don't otherwise see a strong use case for
not compiling tests. Yes it's slower to compile tests,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67409/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67410/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15582
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84590747
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r84591093
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -305,12 +309,8 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84591475
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1455,50 +1455,59 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15513#discussion_r84591482
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/functions.scala
---
@@ -125,7 +129,7 @@ case class DescribeFunctionCommand(
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575
yeah, LGTM, it doesn't change current outputPartitioning of operators.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136#discussion_r84591459
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveUDFSuite.scala
---
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ class HiveUDFSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136#discussion_r84591451
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/AggregationQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -851,6 +851,42 @@ abstract class
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136#discussion_r84591458
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/AggregationQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -851,6 +851,42 @@ abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
**[Test build #67412 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67412/consoleFull)**
for PR 15601 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15601
**[Test build #67413 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67413/consoleFull)**
for PR 15601 at commit
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
