Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15706
Thanks! LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
**[Test build #67876 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67876/consoleFull)**
for PR 15711 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
**[Test build #67877 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67877/consoleFull)**
for PR 15710 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541#discussion_r85882792
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskAssigner.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15681
Reverted all changes and added another createRDD overload ! :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15667
@rxin @ericl Thanks!
@snodawn I will address dynamic partition in a follow-up pr.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13575
No problem here. Spark-17924 is super great (I've been watching it all the
time) and thank you for bringing that up!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
**[Test build #3387 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3387/consoleFull)**
for PR 15710 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
**[Test build #67870 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67870/consoleFull)**
for PR 15172 at commit
Github user snodawn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15667
@viirya @ericl Thanks a lot. The new patch is also passed in my test. And I
sincerely hope dynamic partition could be completed in the future, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15667
Merging in master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r85888109
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -418,21 +424,41 @@ private[spark] class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67868/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669
**[Test build #67868 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67868/consoleFull)**
for PR 15669 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
**[Test build #67866 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67866/consoleFull)**
for PR 15702 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
**[Test build #67867 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67867/consoleFull)**
for PR 15709 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
[SPARK-18192] Support all file formats in structured streaming - WIP
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I just want to run Jenkins for now.
## How was this patch tested?
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688
**[Test build #67871 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67871/consoleFull)**
for PR 15688 at commit
Github user seyfe commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15706
Hi @rxin ,
I added a unittest in
[DatasetSuite](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala)
but I wasn't able to repro it.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67871/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
**[Test build #67874 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67874/consoleFull)**
for PR 15710 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67874/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15703
This will surely improve performance for the UDAFs where the data shrinks
(eg. `max` as you pointed out). I am not sure if it would be better for UDAFs
like `GenericUDAFCollectSet`,
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
It seems fine now. Closing this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67875/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
**[Test build #67875 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67875/consoleFull)**
for PR 15711 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Build started: [SparkR] `ALL`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15681
**[Test build #67879 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67879/consoleFull)**
for PR 15681 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705#discussion_r85890184
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/CatalogFileIndex.scala
---
@@ -67,7 +67,10 @@ class CatalogFileIndex(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542#discussion_r85895743
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/CatalogImpl.scala ---
@@ -133,11 +133,11 @@ class CatalogImpl(sparkSession: SparkSession)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542
**[Test build #67883 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67883/consoleFull)**
for PR 15542 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13575
No problem here. Spark-17924 is super great (I've been watching it all the
time) and @rxin thank you for bringing that up! :-D
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67866/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
**[Test build #67875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67875/consoleFull)**
for PR 15711 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
Oh, it seems 3.3.1 is just right now released for Windows as well. It seems
fine now - https://ci.appveyor.com/project/spark-test/spark/build/45-test1122
I will close this if the tests pass
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
Oh wait. Please do not merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67867/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15709
Yeah I'm fine with fixing a version - but as you said its sometimes helpful
to find if we have some problems with a newly released R version. But yeah we
should have a stable download URL
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
@sethah Thanks for your reviewing. I have made changes according to your
comments. And I will create JIRAs for meta algos.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
**[Test build #67878 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67878/consoleFull)**
for PR 15671 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
To be honest, I find the current API pretty weird (it is some stateful
object that has to be reset every time). I suspect you designed this API by
just abstracting out the logic you wanted to change
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Build started: [SparkR] `ALL`
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15667
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15681
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15681
**[Test build #67879 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67879/consoleFull)**
for PR 15681 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15681
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67879/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
**[Test build #67881 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67881/consoleFull)**
for PR 15024 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67878/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
**[Test build #67878 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67878/consoleFull)**
for PR 15671 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688
**[Test build #67882 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67882/consoleFull)**
for PR 15688 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15691
LGTM, should we put the matrix in the test suite?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15706
**[Test build #3388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3388/consoleFull)**
for PR 15706 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542#discussion_r85896229
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/functions.scala
---
@@ -118,14 +118,16 @@ case class DescribeFunctionCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15707
**[Test build #3386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3386/consoleFull)**
for PR 15707 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67873/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
**[Test build #67873 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67873/consoleFull)**
for PR 15710 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
Build started: [SparkR] `ALL`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15706
**[Test build #3388 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3388/consoleFull)**
for PR 15706 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67877/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15691#discussion_r85890813
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -30,37 +30,185 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67870/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
**[Test build #67880 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67880/consoleFull)**
for PR 15024 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
@yhuai 3 places. It's easy to track it via code diff, as if we miss it
somewhere, the test will fail because no path is specified.(data source tables
never pass the `paths` parameter to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
**[Test build #67876 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67876/consoleFull)**
for PR 15711 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15710
**[Test build #67877 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67877/consoleFull)**
for PR 15710 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67876/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542#discussion_r85895982
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionInfo.java
---
@@ -42,14 +43,23 @@ public String getExtended() {
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15687
Out of curiosity do you remember how many times one was bigger than the
other? if it was 10/10 then you probably have a point, and that there's
something about the way the example actually executes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688
**[Test build #67882 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67882/consoleFull)**
for PR 15688 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14375
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669
**[Test build #67885 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67885/consoleFull)**
for PR 15669 at commit
Github user Stibbons commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85907139
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +84,66 @@ private[spark] class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user mrydzy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15687
It was exactly 7/10. Realising '<=' made the concept clearer to me (as I'm
a beginner following examples), but it might be it's just me, so I'm not
insisting.
2016-11-01 10:40
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15672
@rxin I've updated test sqls to use one dataset. Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15538
Yeah there's a ticket for it to solve a different parquet bug. That might
be the path of least resistance.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
**[Test build #67880 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67880/consoleFull)**
for PR 15024 at commit
Github user Stibbons commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Maybe we can try to split this work in several parts to ease merge. I
clearly think python job should be deployed a bit like jar dependencies are
specified for scala (with `--packages`), and this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67883/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15669
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67881/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
**[Test build #67886 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67886/consoleFull)**
for PR 1 at commit
Github user Stibbons commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r85907419
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonWorkerFactory.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +84,67 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15542
**[Test build #67883 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67883/consoleFull)**
for PR 15542 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15712
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 740 matches
Mail list logo
