Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889
**[Test build #68850 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68850/consoleFull)**
for PR 15889 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15866
OK if it makes the test in question here pass, let's merge it, as a fix for
that test. That much is OK right @HyukjinKwon ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907#discussion_r88670855
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/RadixSortSuite.scala
---
@@ -30,7 +32,7 @@ import
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15930
cc @felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15901#discussion_r88682412
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -245,51 +311,31 @@ case class NewInstance(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68850/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14038
@maropu if you create a PR for your work I'll comment on it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15927
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15932
[SPARK-18448][CORE] SparkSession should implement java.lang.AutoCloseable
like JavaSparkContext
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Just adds `close()` + `Closeable` as a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15932
**[Test build #68854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68854/consoleFull)**
for PR 15932 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15927
**[Test build #68852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68852/consoleFull)**
for PR 15927 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15927
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68852/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15866
Yes please. I am pretty sure that this is a right fix without any other
side effects.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15901#discussion_r88682370
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -164,28 +232,26 @@ case class Invoke(
Github user fabboe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13930#discussion_r88684273
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveUDFSuite.scala
---
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ class HiveUDFSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Thank you for review again, @cloud-fan , @liancheng , and @srowen .
I had the same opinion with @srowen . Also, let's think about the
background of this issue.
Currently, in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #68856 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68856/consoleFull)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r88675871
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameComplexTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -26,6 +26,20 @@ import
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889#discussion_r88679304
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -57,15 +57,18 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15898
**[Test build #68853 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68853/consoleFull)**
for PR 15898 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15898
**[Test build #68853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68853/consoleFull)**
for PR 15898 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
For document, may I add more description about the behavior to help the
user understanding?
**BEFORE**
> The number of JDBC connections, which specifies the maximum number of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15898
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68853/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r88680455
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/CodeGenerationSuite.scala
---
@@ -117,7 +117,10 @@ class CodeGenerationSuite
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15901#discussion_r88684544
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -164,23 +233,20 @@ case class Invoke(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15889
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r88671591
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,29 +56,50 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15898
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #68857 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68857/consoleFull)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r88683023
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -574,7 +574,12 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15932
Sure I'll put it in first thing tomorrow if there are no objections.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Yeah, please improve the document comments and PR descriptions.
It sounds like this is almost ready to merge after these changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68871/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15933
**[Test build #68872 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68872/consoleFull)**
for PR 15933 at commit
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
[SPARK-] add checksum for blocks of broadcast
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A TorrentBroadcast is serialized and compressed first, then splitted as
fixed size blocks,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065
**[Test build #68875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68875/consoleFull)**
for PR 13065 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
**[Test build #68874 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68874/consoleFull)**
for PR 15935 at commit
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
I think I have contaminated the PR with some of my old code. I will push a
new PR soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88713359
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -284,11 +309,26 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
/** @group
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88715322
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -306,6 +346,25 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
@Since("1.5.0")
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88725396
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -35,7 +38,25 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{col, udf}
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88713635
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -284,11 +309,26 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
/** @group
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88714626
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -124,7 +147,8 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
@Since("2.0.0")
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88713108
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -414,6 +414,8 @@ object KMeans {
val RANDOM = "random"
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88725427
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -35,7 +38,25 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{col, udf}
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88722547
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -145,18 +150,67 @@ class KMeansSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r88724978
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -35,7 +38,25 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{col, udf}
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15870
Thanks for doing this. Could you resolve the conflicts, please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
@jkbradley Awesome, thanks so much! :) Now that the API is finalized, I
will work on the User Doc
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
> This option applies only to writing with additional coalesce operation.
It is not clear. We do not always call `coalesce`. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15933
[SPARK-18505][SQL] Simplify AnalyzeColumnCommand
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I'm spending more time at the design & code level for cost-based optimizer
now, and have found
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15933#discussion_r88747950
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
}
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Documentation and PR descriptions are updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
@joshrosen @zsxwing Could you help to review this one ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#discussion_r88753306
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GenerateExec.scala ---
@@ -103,5 +109,182 @@ case class GenerateExec(
}
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
@Yunni Thanks for the updates! I don't think we should include
AND-amplification for 2.1 since we're already in QA. But it'd be nice to get
it in 2.2. Also, 2.2 will give us plenty of time to
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15926
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15866
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15866
Merged to master/2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15934
**[Test build #68873 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68873/consoleFull)**
for PR 15934 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9
@yinxusen I took a look at the updates. Will you be able to create the
design doc that Joseph mentioned?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
I will take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Ah, right. Now always!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
**[Test build #68870 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68870/consoleFull)**
for PR 15923 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68870/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15934
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15934
[SPARK-18497][SS]Make ForeachSink support watermark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The issue in ForeachSink is the new created DataSet still uses the old
GitHub user nsyca opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15936
[SPARK-18504][SQL] Scalar subquery with extra group by columns returning
incorrect result
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR blocks an incorrect result scenario in
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#discussion_r88740233
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GenerateExec.scala ---
@@ -103,5 +109,182 @@ case class GenerateExec(
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
In the future, more code changes might break Hive compatibility
accidentally or intentionally.
Maybe, we can introduce a configuration flag. For example, in DB2, we have
a flag like
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15934
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14650
@rxin @srowen could I get merge pls if there are no other issues?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#discussion_r88754155
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenSuite.scala
---
@@ -113,4 +117,25 @@ class WholeStageCodegenSuite extends
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r88668425
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -42,15 +42,55 @@ trait ExpressionEvalHelper
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907
**[Test build #68855 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68855/consoleFull)**
for PR 15907 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#discussion_r88755507
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/GenerateExec.scala ---
@@ -103,5 +109,192 @@ case class GenerateExec(
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68864/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #68864 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68864/consoleFull)**
for PR 15435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15932
**[Test build #68854 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68854/consoleFull)**
for PR 15932 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
**[Test build #68866 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68866/consoleFull)**
for PR 15921 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68866/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68857/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #68865 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68865/consoleFull)**
for PR 15435 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68856/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13736
**[Test build #68862 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68862/consoleFull)**
for PR 13736 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
**[Test build #68866 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68866/consoleFull)**
for PR 15921 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907
**[Test build #68855 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68855/consoleFull)**
for PR 15907 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68855/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
**[Test build #68867 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68867/consoleFull)**
for PR 15921 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68867/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15921
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #68856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68856/consoleFull)**
for PR 13909 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14812
**[Test build #68860 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68860/consoleFull)**
for PR 14812 at commit
1 - 100 of 405 matches
Mail list logo
