Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69362/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071#discussion_r90155215
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/PartitionProviderCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -205,6 +205,58 @@ class PartitionProviderCompatib
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071#discussion_r90155112
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/PartitionProviderCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -205,6 +205,58 @@ class PartitionProviderCompatib
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071
**[Test build #69370 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69370/consoleFull)**
for PR 16071 at commit
[`4162229`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057
If this is going to support ArrayType only, can you update the pr title to
reflect it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557
**[Test build #69368 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69368/consoleFull)**
for PR 13557 at commit
[`032bb9d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Let's update Zinc here. I wasn't aware that the 0.13.13 version Zinc was
available (its release cycle is slightly behind SBT's).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69368/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16072
[SPARK-18639] Build only a single pip package
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We current build 5 separate pip binary tar balls, doubling the release
script runtime. It'd be bet
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
OK
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16073
[SPARK-18640] Add synchronization to TaskScheduler.runningTasksByExecutors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The method `TaskSchedulerImpl.runningTasksByExecutors()` acc
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16072
**[Test build #69371 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69371/consoleFull)**
for PR 16072 at commit
[`88b53c3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057#discussion_r90157966
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -714,6 +714,17 @@ object TypeCoercion {
/
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16072#discussion_r90158161
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ if [[ "$1" == "package" ]]; then
NAME=$1
FLAGS=$2
ZINC_PORT
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16073
**[Test build #69372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69372/consoleFull)**
for PR 16073 at commit
[`c866a1a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16063
**[Test build #69363 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69363/consoleFull)**
for PR 16063 at commit
[`027c31f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16063
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69363/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16063
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877#discussion_r90158620
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/CountMinSketchAggSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+/*
+ * L
GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
[SPARK-18145] Update documentation for hive partition management in 2.1
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This documents the partition handling changes for Spark 2.1 and how
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
**[Test build #69373 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69373/consoleFull)**
for PR 16074 at commit
[`49eff17`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
**[Test build #69375 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69375/consoleFull)**
for PR 15982 at commit
[`1025c6b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
**[Test build #69374 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69374/consoleFull)**
for PR 16074 at commit
[`9ee308a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
@JoshRosen OK. I will update Zinc to 0.3.11, the latest stable version (The
version of Zinc downloaded from "`Download the latest stable version`" in [Zinc
github](https://github.com/typesafehub/zi
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15972
LGTM
merging with master and branch-2.1
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15972
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
**[Test build #69373 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69373/consoleFull)**
for PR 16074 at commit
[`49eff17`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69373/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
**[Test build #69374 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69374/consoleFull)**
for PR 16074 at commit
[`9ee308a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69374/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16063
**[Test build #69364 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69364/consoleFull)**
for PR 16063 at commit
[`0d54e88`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16063
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16063
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69364/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
**[Test build #69365 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69365/consoleFull)**
for PR 16069 at commit
[`7ae86b7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69365/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16075
[SPARK-18516][Structured Streaming] Follow up PR to add
StreamingQuery.status to Python
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add StreamingQueryStatus.json
- Make it not case
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16069
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16075#discussion_r90163483
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingQueryListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -159,28 +164,6 @@ class StreamingQueryListenerSuite e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16066
**[Test build #69367 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69367/consoleFull)**
for PR 16066 at commit
[`5f8e3d0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16075
**[Test build #69376 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69376/consoleFull)**
for PR 16075 at commit
[`f936595`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16066
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16066
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69367/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mariusvniekerk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
So this is very cool stuff.
Would it be reasonable to add some api pieces so that on the python side
things like DataFrame.mapPartitions makes use of Apache Arrow to lower the
seri
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
@mariusvniekerk I think just getting this working for local connection is
going to be hard so breaking up using arrow on the driver side into a separate
follow up piece of work would make sense.
-
Github user ash211 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061
Another external scheduler backend I'm aware of is Two Sigma's scheduler
backend for the system they've created called
[Cook](https://github.com/twosigma/Cook). See
[CoarseCookSchedulerBackend.scal
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067#discussion_r90164208
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/ConstraintPropagationSuite.scala
---
@@ -351,6 +351,15 @@ class ConstraintPropa
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067
Also cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell @sameeragarwal @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998#discussion_r90164420
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalog.scala
---
@@ -189,11 +189,28 @@ abstract class ExternalCatalog {
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998#discussion_r90164431
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -730,6 +730,23 @@ class SessionCatalog(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067
**[Test build #69377 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69377/consoleFull)**
for PR 16067 at commit
[`a835f80`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
**[Test build #69378 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69378/consoleFull)**
for PR 15998 at commit
[`48ae2a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998#discussion_r90164499
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/InMemoryCatalog.scala
---
@@ -482,6 +483,19 @@ class InMemoryCatalog(
}
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15998
I will work on additional unit test coverage tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15255
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15255
**[Test build #69379 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69379/consoleFull)**
for PR 15255 at commit
[`57817a1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16066
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
LGTM merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16066
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90165717
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class FileStreamSinkSuite extends StreamTest
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16074
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
**[Test build #69369 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69369/consoleFull)**
for PR 16046 at commit
[`1d32958`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69369/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071
**[Test build #69370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69370/consoleFull)**
for PR 16071 at commit
[`4162229`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69370/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067#discussion_r90167277
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -58,13 +57,28 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Query
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16072
**[Test build #69371 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69371/consoleFull)**
for PR 16072 at commit
[`88b53c3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16072
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16072
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69371/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r90167716
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -437,4 +438,38 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](df
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557
LGTM, merged into master and branch-2.1. Thank you all.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061#discussion_r90168566
--- Diff: kubernetes/README.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# Pre-requisites
+* maven, JDK and all other pre-requisites for building Spark.
+
+# Steps
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061#discussion_r90168600
--- Diff: kubernetes/README.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# Pre-requisites
+* maven, JDK and all other pre-requisites for building Spark.
+
+# Steps
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13557
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067#discussion_r90168753
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -58,13 +57,28 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Q
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
ping @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
**[Test build #69380 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69380/consoleFull)**
for PR 16052 at commit
[`39b4867`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16073
**[Test build #69372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69372/consoleFull)**
for PR 16073 at commit
[`c866a1a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16073
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69372/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16073
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009
**[Test build #69381 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69381/consoleFull)**
for PR 16009 at commit
[`27b07ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16067#discussion_r90169798
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -58,13 +57,28 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Query
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16014
Any more thought on this? Without this we don't really have a signed
tarball in the official release to release to CRAN...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009#discussion_r90169879
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -49,15 +49,13 @@ private[feature] trait ChiSqSelectorParams extends
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16014
Sorry I was caught up with some other stuff today. Will take a final look
tomm morning.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
**[Test build #69375 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69375/consoleFull)**
for PR 15982 at commit
[`1025c6b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69375/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15915
**[Test build #69382 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69382/consoleFull)**
for PR 15915 at commit
[`ad85da0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
**[Test build #69383 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69383/consoleFull)**
for PR 15987 at commit
[`9db07af`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90172243
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -590,7 +591,11 @@ object ScalaReflection extends ScalaReflec
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16072
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16072
**[Test build #69384 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69384/consoleFull)**
for PR 16072 at commit
[`88b53c3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16075
**[Test build #69376 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69376/consoleFull)**
for PR 16075 at commit
[`f936595`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
501 - 600 of 671 matches
Mail list logo
