Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98011972
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -263,17 +288,21 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700
**[Test build #72025 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72025/testReport)**
for PR 16700 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98018738
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -578,6 +578,79 @@ class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043#discussion_r98026636
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ComplexTypes.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16138#discussion_r97976102
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1047,6 +1048,64 @@ case class
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r97980819
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalogUtils.scala
---
@@ -120,6 +120,24 @@ object
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98013552
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -263,17 +288,21 @@ class
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98014650
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -736,15 +765,27 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700
**[Test build #72025 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72025/testReport)**
for PR 16700 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98015797
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -736,15 +765,27 @@ class
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98016201
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -263,17 +288,21 @@ class
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98019881
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -578,6 +578,79 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
**[Test build #72024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72024/testReport)**
for PR 16680 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98019350
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -578,6 +578,79 @@ class
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98012237
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Instance.scala
---
@@ -27,3 +27,25 @@ import org.apache.spark.ml.linalg.Vector
*
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98012093
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Instance.scala
---
@@ -27,3 +27,25 @@ import org.apache.spark.ml.linalg.Vector
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700
**[Test build #72026 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72026/testReport)**
for PR 16700 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98018075
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -753,14 +794,15 @@ class
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16654
@zhengruifeng don't most ML libraries have separate clustering evaluators?
For example, WEKA has ClusterEvalution class. Scikit-learn just has a metrics
class and functions you can call,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Sure!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98010924
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -94,6 +94,17 @@ private[regression] trait
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98017514
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -753,14 +794,15 @@ class
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
This looks really good. I made a couple more comments. I'm not sure about
the class hierarchy of Instance/OffsetInstance. Maybe committers can take a
look/comment on this PR? @jkbradley
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r98020407
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -578,6 +578,79 @@ class
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
@srowen @yanboliang might you be able to take a look at this PR? Is it
possibly too large and I should break it up into 3 PRs, one per
evaluator/metrics class?
---
If your project is set
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
**[Test build #72022 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72022/testReport)**
for PR 16693 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r97977055
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/ExternalCatalogUtils.scala
---
@@ -120,6 +120,24 @@ object
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
shall we rename `InferSchema` to `JsonInferSchema`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72023/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536
**[Test build #72021 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72021/testReport)**
for PR 16536 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72022/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
@gatorsmile thanks for adding comments about why the cleanup is safe!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72021/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536
**[Test build #72021 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72021/testReport)**
for PR 16536 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16575
I suppose it makes sense. The only thing I am wondering if this doesn't
subtly breaks things. I am certain that some weirdness is to be expected with
respect to session local configurations. For
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Sure! I'll send follow-up prs as soon as possible.
Thanks a lot for your review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
**[Test build #72022 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72022/testReport)**
for PR 16693 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
ping @sethah @Lewuathe @thunterdb @WeichenXu123 @jkbradley would you be
able to take a look at the changes to add a weight column to
binary/multiclass/regression evaluators/metrics classes?
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16696#discussion_r98002931
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -727,37 +728,18 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72023/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710#discussion_r98048517
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/exists-subquery/exists-basic.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+-- Automatically generated
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16695
Actually this can be considered kind of a continuation of SPARK-2669.
The issue this is trying to solve is that the NMs don't necessarily have a
client Hadoop configuration in place. (Or
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
I'll go ahead and close this review. We can always reopen later, but it
really does seem that it is fixed now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r98056351
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -839,6 +839,25 @@ private[spark] class
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16695
It's kind of a side-effect of how we deploy client configurations, I think.
We've had some issues with the topology scripts not being available together
with Spark client configs in certain
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16582
I wasn't really planning to backport this, unless someone is really
interested in this functionality.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r98043010
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -718,6 +703,21 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
"
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710
**[Test build #72029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72029/testReport)**
for PR 16710 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536#discussion_r98048118
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1826,19 +1826,27 @@ class UserDefinedFunction(object):
def __init__(self, func, returnType,
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536#discussion_r98049505
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1826,19 +1826,27 @@ class UserDefinedFunction(object):
def __init__(self, func, returnType,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r98056608
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -839,6 +839,25 @@ private[spark] class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r98057702
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -899,6 +918,21 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72028 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72028/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710#discussion_r98048551
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/exists-subquery/exists-within-and-or.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+-- Automatically
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r98055435
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -839,6 +839,25 @@ private[spark] class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r98055321
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -839,6 +839,25 @@ private[spark] class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r98057316
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -899,6 +918,21 @@ private[spark] class
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
I wouldn't ping that frequently, please. I don't feel qualified to review
this myself.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72024/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
**[Test build #72030 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72030/testReport)**
for PR 16494 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16707
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16707
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16711
[SPARK-19220][UI] Make redirection to HTTPS apply to all URIs. (branch-2.1)
The redirect handler was installed only for the root of the server;
any other context ended up being served directly
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
@QQshu1 1.) It seems that we are creating the wrong type of object when
getting edges, EdgeRDDImpl instead of edge partitions, when setting the
checkpoint 2.) I was able to repro the issue
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16695
> then overlay the user's config on top of it
Just tried this for kicks and doing it the naive way (with `addResource`)
would result in a bunch of warnings:
WARN
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16693
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536#discussion_r98055966
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1826,19 +1826,27 @@ class UserDefinedFunction(object):
def __init__(self, func, returnType,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r98055867
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -839,6 +839,25 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72026/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536#discussion_r98043331
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1826,19 +1826,27 @@ class UserDefinedFunction(object):
def __init__(self, func, returnType,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16711
**[Test build #72031 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72031/testReport)**
for PR 16711 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72033/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #72033 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72033/testReport)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16690
**[Test build #72027 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72027/testReport)**
for PR 16690 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72023 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72023/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16695
this seems really really specific to the scripts being in the hadoop conf
directory and the user using default mapping. I assume the hadoop confs on the
nodemanagers have a different config then
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710
cc @hvanhovell @gatorsmile @nsyca
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16497
**[Test build #72032 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72032/testReport)**
for PR 16497 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r98056076
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -839,6 +839,25 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536
**[Test build #72034 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72034/testReport)**
for PR 16536 at commit
Github user vanzin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16695
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700
**[Test build #72026 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72026/testReport)**
for PR 16700 at commit
GitHub user dilipbiswal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710
[SPARK-18872] New test cases for EXISTS subquery
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the first set of tests for EXISTS subquery.
- exists-basic.sql
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
**[Test build #72024 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72024/testReport)**
for PR 16680 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16494
@jkbradley I verified that this bug is fixed after rebasing to latest.
Should I go ahead and close this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #72033 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72033/testReport)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16695
So I'm just curious, in the specific case you saw this issue, what were the
configs? The configs on NM had the correct path or the ones on the gateways
were only pointing to gateway. If any
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16700#discussion_r98056949
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -899,6 +918,21 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16706
**[Test build #72036 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72036/testReport)**
for PR 16706 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16706#discussion_r98061320
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEndpointAddress.scala
---
@@ -25,10 +27,11 @@ import org.apache.spark.SparkException
* The
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16712
Attached are a slightly modified version of the submitted test file to
adapt to IBM DB2 syntax, and the result of the run.
[Modified version of the test
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16712
@kevinyu, @gatorsmile. Also FYI to @hvanhovell.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16536
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72034/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 419 matches
Mail list logo
