Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
**[Test build #72457 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72457/testReport)**
for PR 16803 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16636#discussion_r99647218
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -79,6 +79,25 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
cc @holden, @srowen and @mortada who were in the PR. Could three of you
take a look when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
[SPARK-18069][PYTHON] Make PySpark doctests for SQL self-contained
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to make the examples in Python API documentation
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16819
I agree. Resource managers generally expect applications to request more
than what's available already so we don't have to do it again ourselves in
Spark.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user pfcoperez closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pfcoperez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
@andrewor14 OK, no discussion: I'll close it.
Just an observation:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
Yeah, non-starter I'm afraid.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16636#discussion_r99645731
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -79,6 +79,25 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
This is a bad idea! First it breaks backward compatibility, and second, we
intentionally didn't want to make it so general that the user can pass in any
objects. Can you please close this PR?
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795#discussion_r99643730
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@
test
+ org.apache.avro
--- End diff --
I moved
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72454/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
**[Test build #72454 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72454/testReport)**
for PR 16821 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72460 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72460/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72460/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Yes, I tried to only move and does not touch the code path at my best. Let
me check this again tomorrow with Scala 2.10 build and ping you again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
@gatorsmile Currently for exists we are missing 1) Negative scenarios 2)
Generators (there is one test case in subquerysuite) for it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72460 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72460/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72459 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72459/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72459/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72459 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72459/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
GitHub user pfcoperez opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
[SPARK] Config methods simplification at SparkSession#Builder
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`SparkSession`' companion object `Builder` inner class presents several
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72451/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
**[Test build #72451 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72451/testReport)**
for PR 16820 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Sorry I didn't compare the CSV part with JSON part closely, I'm ok to keep
them consistent now. To confirm, this PR just moves codes around right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r99627383
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/package.scala ---
@@ -21,4 +21,10 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql
* Contains a
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680#discussion_r99628216
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -39,22 +37,76 @@ private[csv] object
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99618027
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2161,6 +2161,96 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99616688
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1191,8 +1191,29 @@ class DAGScheduler(
} else {
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99615449
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2161,6 +2161,96 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99615666
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2161,6 +2161,96 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99618127
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -648,4 +661,70 @@ class BasicSchedulerIntegrationSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99615906
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2161,6 +2161,96 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99615141
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
* See the License for the specific language
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72456/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
thanks for the review, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72458/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72458 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72458/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72456 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72456/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r99625665
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala ---
@@ -162,6 +162,28 @@ abstract class OrcSuite extends QueryTest
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795#discussion_r99624416
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@
test
+ org.apache.avro
--- End diff --
Thank
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r99623985
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/package.scala ---
@@ -21,4 +21,10 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql
* Contains a type
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72450/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r99623795
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1457,8 +1457,31 @@ class AstBuilder extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
**[Test build #72450 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72450/testReport)**
for PR 16820 at commit
Github user robbinspg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795#discussion_r99622258
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@
test
+ org.apache.avro
--- End diff --
Is this
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
LGTM, though checkpointing to S3 has its own separate issues related to
rename performance and listing inconsistency. While this fix lets people
request different filesystems for the data,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72458 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72458/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810
@joshrosen to merge this, I believe I'd need your assistance to change the
Jenkins jobs -- to specify `-Phadoop-2.6` or no Hadoop profile, and to remove
the build profiles for `master` for 2.5 and
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
[SPARK-19475][PYTHON][ML][MLLIB] Support (ml|mllib).linalg.Vector negation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Modify `DenseVector._delegate` to support unary operators,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72447/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #72447 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72447/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795#discussion_r99615960
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@
test
+ org.apache.avro
--- End diff --
Ah sorry I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72446/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
**[Test build #72446 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72446/testReport)**
for PR 16680 at commit
Github user Krimit commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16811#discussion_r99612768
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Word2Vec.scala
---
@@ -232,19 +232,40 @@ class Word2VecModel private[ml] (
@Since("1.5.0")
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
**[Test build #72457 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72457/testReport)**
for PR 16803 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72444/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
**[Test build #72444 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72444/testReport)**
for PR 16269 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
yes, but in this pr which modify the IsolatedClientLoader.forVersion it
only affects Hive jars, maybe later we can use it in another place to download
other jars
---
If your project is set up
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16751
Hi, @robbinspg and @srowen .
Could you review the PR #16795 for that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72456 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72456/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72455/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72455 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72455/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
**[Test build #72454 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72454/testReport)**
for PR 16821 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72455 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72455/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16817
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
[SPARK-19472][SQL] Parser should mistake CASE WHEN(...) for a function call
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The SQL parser can mistake a `WHEN (...)` used in `CASE` for a
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16817
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72453 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72453/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72453/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72437/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72453 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72453/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810
**[Test build #72437 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72437/testReport)**
for PR 16810 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
**[Test build #3556 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3556/testReport)**
for PR 16738 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99597739
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,51 @@ class StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99595765
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -600,6 +603,16 @@ class
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99596922
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -456,4 +461,69 @@ class BlacklistTrackerSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99596040
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,51 @@ class StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72452 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72452/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72452/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72435/
Test PASSed.
---
301 - 400 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
