Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72447/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
**[Test build #3558 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3558/testReport)**
for PR 16815 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72452 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72452/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72452/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
**[Test build #3556 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3556/testReport)**
for PR 16738 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72437/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72455 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72455/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72455/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
yes, but in this pr which modify the IsolatedClientLoader.forVersion it
only affects Hive jars, maybe later we can use it in another place to download
other jars
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72444/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16817
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795#discussion_r99615960
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@
test
+ org.apache.avro
--- End diff --
Ah sorry I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16751
Hi, @robbinspg and @srowen .
Could you review the PR #16795 for that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
**[Test build #72457 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72457/testReport)**
for PR 16803 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
**[Test build #72450 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72450/testReport)**
for PR 16820 at commit
Github user yangw1234 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
@hvanhovell thanks for your review. Whole stage code generation seems fine
and unit test is added.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
[SPARK-19472][SQL] Parser should mistake CASE WHEN(...) for a function call
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The SQL parser can mistake a `WHEN (...)` used in `CASE` for a
Github user Krimit commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16811#discussion_r99612768
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Word2Vec.scala
---
@@ -232,19 +232,40 @@ class Word2VecModel private[ml] (
@Since("1.5.0")
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
**[Test build #72446 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72446/testReport)**
for PR 16680 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72449 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72449/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237
merged to master, thanks @erenavsarogullari
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72435/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99597739
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,51 @@ class StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72453 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72453/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16817
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
**[Test build #72447 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72447/testReport)**
for PR 16626 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72464 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72464/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99661763
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -456,4 +461,69 @@ class BlacklistTrackerSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
**[Test build #72466 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72466/testReport)**
for PR 16650 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99664877
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Entropy.scala ---
@@ -83,23 +83,29 @@ object Entropy extends Impurity {
* @param
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #72469 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72469/testReport)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99668948
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LabeledPoint.scala ---
@@ -35,4 +35,11 @@ case class LabeledPoint(@Since("2.0.0") label: Double,
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99670310
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/DecisionTreeClassifier.scala
---
@@ -106,14 +122,18 @@ class DecisionTreeClassifier
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
LGTM, though checkpointing to S3 has its own separate issues related to
rename performance and listing inconsistency. While this fix lets people
request different filesystems for the data,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72450/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r99623985
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/package.scala ---
@@ -21,4 +21,10 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql
* Contains a type
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72456 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72456/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r99627383
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/package.scala ---
@@ -21,4 +21,10 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql
* Contains a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72459 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72459/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Yes, I tried to only move and does not touch the code path at my best. Let
me check this again tomorrow with Scala 2.10 build and ping you again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99660453
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99660675
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -489,6 +491,29 @@ class
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99660704
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Amending this PR to upgrade the KCL/AWS SDK dependencies to more-current
versions (1.7.3 and 1.11.76, respectively). The
```RegionUtils.getRegionByEndpoint()``` API was removed from the SDK, so I've
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99664273
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/DecisionTreeMetadata.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99667381
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/DecisionTreeClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -351,6 +370,36 @@ class
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99666983
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/TreeTests.scala ---
@@ -124,8 +129,8 @@ private[ml] object TreeTests extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625
**[Test build #72470 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72470/testReport)**
for PR 16625 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99659988
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99660908
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,51 @@ class
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99660755
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -600,6 +603,16 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72465/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99661191
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,51 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
**[Test build #72468 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72468/testReport)**
for PR 16650 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99665910
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Variance.scala ---
@@ -70,17 +70,24 @@ object Variance extends Impurity {
* Note:
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99668686
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -590,8 +599,8 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72464 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72464/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72464/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99664044
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,52 @@ class StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810
@srowen, I'll help with this. It turns out that we don't need to make any
Jenkins configuration changes for the pull request builder. For the master
branch builders, I've gone ahead and disabled
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99665188
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/impurity/Impurity.scala ---
@@ -79,7 +79,12 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user jsoltren commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99664910
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,52 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72467 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72467/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
I'll double check, but I don't think
```spark.sql.hive.manageFilesourcePartitions=false``` would solve this issue
since we're still deriving the file relation's dataSchema parameter from the
schema
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r9967
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -281,10 +283,26 @@ object MLTestingUtils extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
@gatorsmile Yeah Sean. Actually most likely i will need to work out a
different schema than what i have currently for the generator tests. So i was
planning to add the negative scenarios and
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625#discussion_r99667702
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1797,6 +1797,20 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625#discussion_r99668339
--- Diff: docs/security.md ---
@@ -49,10 +49,6 @@ component-specific configuration namespaces used to
override the default setting
Component
Github user drcrallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
FYI, we have a build process that packages spark core, now that mesos is is
in its own artifact, this broke our build and deploy process, and its not
called out in release notes
---
If your
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
The release notes are for end users, and this doesn't impact end users.
Developers are expected, more or less, to follow commits and dev@ to keep up
with changes like this.
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722
**[Test build #72471 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72471/testReport)**
for PR 16722 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
This is a bad idea! First it breaks backward compatibility, and second, we
intentionally didn't want to make it so general that the user can pass in any
objects. Can you please close this PR?
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
[SPARK-18069][PYTHON] Make PySpark doctests for SQL self-contained
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to make the examples in Python API documentation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
**[Test build #72461 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72461/testReport)**
for PR 16824 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16791
@HyukjinKwon Sorry that I didn't see your comment before this PR got
merged. I believe PARQUET-686 had already been fixed by apache/parquet-mr#367
but wasn't marked as resolved in JIRA. Thanks
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
@dongjoon-hyun, you may add `[TEST-MAVEN]` in the PR title to ask Jenkins
to test this PR using Maven.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
Agree, though we are talking about duplicating 1 line of code in 3 nearby
places. It's not meaningfully duplicating anything.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user pfcoperez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
@andrewor14 OK, no discussion: I'll close it.
Just an observation:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
Yeah, non-starter I'm afraid.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
cc @holden, @srowen and @mortada who were in the PR. Could three of you
take a look when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72457/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Oh, thank you, @liancheng !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
Merged this to master. Thanks for the fix @jinxing64 -- these fixes to
improve readability / usability of the code are super useful!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72462/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72449/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72453 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72453/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72453/
Test FAILed.
---
301 - 400 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
