Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72456 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72456/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72446/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795#discussion_r99643730
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@
test
+ org.apache.avro
--- End diff --
I moved
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16636#discussion_r99645731
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -79,6 +79,25 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user pfcoperez closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16819
I agree. Resource managers generally expect applications to request more
than what's available already so we don't have to do it again ourselves in
Spark.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
**[Test build #72457 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72457/testReport)**
for PR 16803 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
**[Test build #72462 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72462/testReport)**
for PR 16824 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16636#discussion_r99647218
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -79,6 +79,25 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
@yanboliang, just a friendly reminder please don't forget to review the PR
when you have time. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16791
Ah, thank you for confirming and the information!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
**[Test build #72462 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72462/testReport)**
for PR 16824 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
**[Test build #72461 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72461/testReport)**
for PR 16824 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72461/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user pfcoperez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
@andrewor14 @srowen In any case, I just wanted to add that copying code is,
basically the worst strategy.
If you wanted to constraint the types for those tree and not just
**AnyVal**
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72463 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72463/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
@dilipbiswal Are you planning to submit another PR for `Generators` or do
it in this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r99625665
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala ---
@@ -162,6 +162,28 @@ abstract class OrcSuite extends QueryTest
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72460 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72460/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72460 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72460/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72460/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810
@joshrosen to merge this, I believe I'd need your assistance to change the
Jenkins jobs -- to specify `-Phadoop-2.6` or no Hadoop profile, and to remove
the build profiles for `master` for 2.5 and
GitHub user zero323 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
[SPARK-19475][PYTHON][ML][MLLIB] Support (ml|mllib).linalg.Vector negation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Modify `DenseVector._delegate` to support unary operators,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72458 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72458/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795#discussion_r99624416
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@
test
+ org.apache.avro
--- End diff --
Thank
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72458/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72458 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72458/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99615449
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2161,6 +2161,96 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99618027
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2161,6 +2161,96 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99616688
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1191,8 +1191,29 @@ class DAGScheduler(
} else {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680#discussion_r99628216
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -39,22 +37,76 @@ private[csv] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72454/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
thanks for the review, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72456/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16760
@gatorsmile Currently for exists we are missing 1) Negative scenarios 2)
Generators (there is one test case in subquerysuite) for it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user robbinspg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795#discussion_r99622258
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@
test
+ org.apache.avro
--- End diff --
Is this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r99623795
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1457,8 +1457,31 @@ class AstBuilder extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
**[Test build #72450 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72450/testReport)**
for PR 16820 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16680
Sorry I didn't compare the CSV part with JSON part closely, I'm ok to keep
them consistent now. To confirm, this PR just moves codes around right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72451/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
**[Test build #72459 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72459/testReport)**
for PR 16822 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16822
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72459/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99618127
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -648,4 +661,70 @@ class BasicSchedulerIntegrationSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99615666
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2161,6 +2161,96 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99615906
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2161,6 +2161,96 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99615141
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
* See the License for the specific language
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
**[Test build #72451 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72451/testReport)**
for PR 16820 at commit
GitHub user pfcoperez opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16823
[SPARK] Config methods simplification at SparkSession#Builder
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`SparkSession`' companion object `Builder` inner class presents several
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
**[Test build #72454 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72454/testReport)**
for PR 16821 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821#discussion_r99676254
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ExpressionParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
Thanks! Merging to master/2.1/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99677955
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -763,7 +763,9 @@ object DDLUtils {
val HIVE_PROVIDER =
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99679185
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -763,7 +763,9 @@ object DDLUtils {
val HIVE_PROVIDER =
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99679303
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99679239
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user evilezh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949
any update on this. It is real pain with driver ? As i see patch is ready
.. question is about when yo merge ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795#discussion_r99678662
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -130,6 +130,12 @@
test
+ org.apache.avro
--- End diff --
@srowen
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99680029
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99681098
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99680917
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -168,6 +168,43 @@ case class AlterTableRenameCommand(
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99678116
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99680331
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99681895
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
Looks reasonable, but I'd prefer slightly different log messages.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72463 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72463/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Hi @budde, taking a look at this now. Sorry for the wait
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744#discussion_r99709988
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/KinesisExampleUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722
**[Test build #72471 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72471/testReport)**
for PR 16722 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user xwu0226 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16626#discussion_r99681470
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -814,4 +816,50 @@ object DDLUtils {
}
}
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99686720
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -69,19 +72,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99686323
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -69,19 +72,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72471/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99661979
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -648,4 +661,70 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99659930
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -519,6 +520,18 @@ class TestTaskScheduler(sc:
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99660324
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -391,17 +391,18 @@ private[spark] abstract class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620#discussion_r99660627
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulerIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -648,4 +661,70 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72467/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650
**[Test build #72466 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72466/testReport)**
for PR 16650 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72465/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72465/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #72469 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72469/testReport)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
The current failure about `ExtendedYarnTest` came from `mesos` module . It
seems to be irrelevant to this PR. Let me check that.
```
[info] Running Spark tests using Maven with these
401 - 500 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
