Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100687410
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +142,23 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100687458
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -48,69 +47,110 @@ class JacksonParser(
// A
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
@tejasapatil thanks for your review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870#discussion_r100687862
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -95,9 +95,10 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
sdf
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
ok, all 100 times of `KafkaSourceSuite` passed.
let's now do a full pass of testing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72778/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72778/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100692348
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +142,26 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
Close this in favor of #16898.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72768 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72768/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
**[Test build #72771 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72771/testReport)**
for PR 16899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72766/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72766 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72766/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72777 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72777/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72769/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72779/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72778/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user lw-lin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72782/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
**[Test build #72774 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72774/testReport)**
for PR 16674 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72783/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72775/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
**[Test build #72764 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72764/testReport)**
for PR 16898 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724#discussion_r100687150
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -369,7 +371,78 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724#discussion_r100687176
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategySuite.scala
---
@@ -487,6 +487,36 @@ class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100687628
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -120,9 +127,10 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72769 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72769/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
**[Test build #72770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72770/testReport)**
for PR 16899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72770/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72781/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16901
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16832
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72761/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72762/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16832
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72763/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724#discussion_r100687248
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -369,7 +371,78 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724
@cloud-fan ok. I will look into it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16724#discussion_r100687252
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategySuite.scala
---
@@ -487,6 +487,36 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
**[Test build #72770 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72770/testReport)**
for PR 16899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72773/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72768 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72768/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72773/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72768/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11192
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
**[Test build #72780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72780/testReport)**
for PR 16777 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100692415
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +142,26 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72783/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16897
@yucai far too trivial. Please close this and don't open PRs like this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777#discussion_r100690775
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +386,67 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72769 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72769/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72775/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100687347
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +142,23 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72766 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72766/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100687380
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +142,23 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
Let's start by running only `KafkaSourceSuite` for 1000 times
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72765 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72765/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72765/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72775 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72775/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
@kayousterhout
Thanks a lot for the clear explanation. It makes great sense to me and help
me understand the logic a lot. Also I think the way of testing is very good and
make the code very
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
[SPARK-19563][SQL] advoid unnecessary sort in FileFormatWriter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `FileFormatWriter`, we will sort the input rows by partition columns
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
cc @viirya @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870#discussion_r100687520
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -95,9 +95,10 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
sdf
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100687514
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +142,26 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
**[Test build #72767 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72767/testReport)**
for PR 16898 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100689894
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -617,13 +617,17 @@ class Analyzer(
private
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16900
**[Test build #72772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72772/testReport)**
for PR 16900 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
Thanks @cloud-fan for your detailed review. I will keep in mind those
comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72774/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16901
[SPARK-19565] Improve DAGScheduler tests.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is related to #16620.
When fetch failed, stage will be resubmitted. There can be
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16901
@kayousterhout @squito @markhamstra
As mentioned in #16620 , I think it might make sense to make this pr.
Please take a look. If you think it is too trivial, I will close.
---
If your
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100692456
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -134,8 +142,26 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
@cloud-fan I remove the islenient param, the tests passed, it seems remove
islenient is ok
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777#discussion_r100687275
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +386,67 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777#discussion_r100687309
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +386,67 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777#discussion_r100687325
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -379,6 +386,67 @@ class TypeCoercionSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72765 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72765/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
LGTM except several minor tests about tests, thanks for working on it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898#discussion_r100687761
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -363,80 +393,42 @@ object FileFormatWriter
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
Few comments. Others LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user yucai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16897
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user yucai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16897
@srowen OK, got it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
**[Test build #72764 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72764/testReport)**
for PR 16898 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72764/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16899
[DO_NOT_MERGE][Test] Investigate KafkaSourceSuite flakiness
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
**[Test build #72767 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72767/testReport)**
for PR 16898 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16898
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
