Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72984/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101462262
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -161,23 +161,49 @@ private[hive] class
HiveMetastoreCatalog(spa
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101461282
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -163,6 +163,10 @@ case class BucketSpec(
* @param tr
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101461466
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -296,6 +296,17 @@ object SQLConf {
.longConf
.creat
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16944#discussion_r101461106
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -296,6 +296,17 @@ object SQLConf {
.longConf
.creat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16947
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841#discussion_r101462455
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-multiple-columns.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+-- A test suite for multi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16947
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72988/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16952
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72986/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16952
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72987/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
terminated by signal 9. retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
**[Test build #72989 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72989/testReport)**
for PR 16949 at commit
[`a3d2abb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a3
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r101466954
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +344,96 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user carsonwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16952
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r101468470
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +343,104 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16952
**[Test build #72990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72990/testReport)**
for PR 16952 at commit
[`b2eb68a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
**[Test build #72991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72991/testReport)**
for PR 16928 at commit
[`df39e39`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/df
GitHub user dilipbiswal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
[SPARK-18874][SQL] First phase: Deferring the correlated predicate pull up
to Optimizer phase
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently Analyzer as part of ResolveSubque
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
**[Test build #72992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72992/testReport)**
for PR 16954 at commit
[`33844bb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/33
Github user radekg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608
@cherryii FYI, it's possible to achieve the same setup without using bridge
networking, if you can use host network, it's perfectly fine to set this up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r101478064
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +344,96 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
GitHub user yaooqinn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16955
[SPARK-19626]update cred using spark.yarn.credentials.updateTime
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
update cred using spark.yarn.credentials.updateTime
## How was
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16955
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16955#discussion_r101481467
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/CredentialUpdater.scala
---
@@ -55,14 +55,10 @@ private[spark] clas
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
**[Test build #72991 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72991/testReport)**
for PR 16928 at commit
[`df39e39`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72991/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dosoft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16924#discussion_r101487342
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -137,7 +138,13 @@ private[spark] class EventLoggingListener(
Github user yaooqinn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16955#discussion_r101491787
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/security/CredentialUpdater.scala
---
@@ -55,14 +55,10 @@ private[spark] class
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
**[Test build #72993 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72993/testReport)**
for PR 16928 at commit
[`df39e39`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/df
Github user yaooqinn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16955
cc again @jerryshao
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
**[Test build #72989 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72989/testReport)**
for PR 16949 at commit
[`a3d2abb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72989/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16920
@rxin cool, `Jirafy` is enough.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user packtpartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8632
Hi @srowen , where is the Github repository to feature books on
http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16952
**[Test build #72990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72990/testReport)**
for PR 16952 at commit
[`b2eb68a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16952
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16952
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72990/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
**[Test build #72992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72992/testReport)**
for PR 16954 at commit
[`33844bb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72992/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16936
Hm it just seems like the wrong approach, to externally estimate whether in
theory it won't schedule. It is certainly a problem if streaming doesn't work
though users would already realize it. The er
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954
cc @hvanhovell @gatorsmile @nsyca
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16924#discussion_r101502214
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -137,7 +138,13 @@ private[spark] class EventLoggingListener(
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r101505199
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +341,91 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476
**[Test build #72994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72994/testReport)**
for PR 16476 at commit
[`0665a1d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/06
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16955
There's no detail in the JIRA or PR. I can't tell whether you are solving
the problem you set out to solve. Are you saying this is the entire problem,
that the wrong config is being queried?
---
If
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
It's a simple change, but I wonder if this is that important to add?
I always have a worry in the back of my mind that this becomes a security
hole, as it's a way to look through the complete envi
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16926
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16926
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16955
Agreed with @srowen , please describe the problem and fix both here in PR
and in JIRA, also changing the title to be more meaningful. It would be better
for others without the context to understan
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16949
@srowen good questionï¼IMHOï¼we should add this API:
- provide complete API, the same as users see in webui
- if this is a security issue, we should address it in other ways
- mayb
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16936
Let us call @zsxwing for some suggestions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r101515786
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +341,91 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r101516174
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +343,104 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
**[Test build #72993 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72993/testReport)**
for PR 16928 at commit
[`df39e39`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72993/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cherryii commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608
The reason I'm asking is because bridge networking would solve a lot of
other problems. So does that mean bridge networking on mesos and docker isn't
supported right now?
---
If your project is se
GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
[SPARK-19598][SQL]Remove the alias parameter in UnresolvedRelation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove the alias parameter in `UnresolvedRelation`, and use `Subquer
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956#discussion_r101530187
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveHints.scala
---
@@ -54,10 +54,6 @@ object ResolveHints {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
**[Test build #72995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72995/testReport)**
for PR 16956 at commit
[`4023727`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/40
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
**[Test build #72995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72995/testReport)**
for PR 16956 at commit
[`4023727`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72995/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
**[Test build #72996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72996/testReport)**
for PR 16956 at commit
[`3c4be76`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72996/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
**[Test build #72996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72996/testReport)**
for PR 16956 at commit
[`3c4be76`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3c
Github user yaooqinn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16955
@srowen @jerryshao Thanks for your comments. I have added some
descriptions both in the JIRA and here, please check whether OK or not.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r101531848
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/DecisionTreeClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -351,6 +370,36 @@ class DecisionTreeClassi
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
This caused the SBT build to fail because MiMa doesn't like Java 8
bytecode, but this might be simple config issue. Investigating ...
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%2
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r101532020
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/BaggedPoint.scala ---
@@ -60,12 +68,14 @@ private[spark] object BaggedPoint {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
**[Test build #72997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72997/testReport)**
for PR 16857 at commit
[`a728282`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
**[Test build #72997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72997/testReport)**
for PR 16857 at commit
[`a728282`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72997/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956#discussion_r101535507
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveHints.scala
---
@@ -54,10 +54,6 @@ object ResolveHints {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72998/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
**[Test build #72998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72998/testReport)**
for PR 16857 at commit
[`a563325`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
**[Test build #72998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72998/testReport)**
for PR 16857 at commit
[`a563325`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a5
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16871
Yep, since `dev/mima` runs just `java`, it's likely picking up Java 7 from
the Jenkins machines. The jobs all set `JAVA_HOME`, and set it to the Java 8
home. Other Spark scripts here will use `$JAVA_
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
**[Test build #73000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73000/testReport)**
for PR 16857 at commit
[`6fe61b0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16956
**[Test build #72999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72999/testReport)**
for PR 16956 at commit
[`accd3b9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ac
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16957
[SPARK-19550][HOTFIX][BUILD] Use JAVA_HOME/bin/java if JAVA_HOME is set in
dev/mima
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Use JAVA_HOME/bin/java if JAVA_HOME is set in dev/mi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16957
**[Test build #73001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73001/testReport)**
for PR 16957 at commit
[`17a61f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/17
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
@cloud-fan @gatorsmile @tejasapatil let's discuss this together?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16958
[SPARK-13721][SQL] Make GeneratorOuter unresolved.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a small change to make GeneratorOuter always unresolved. It is
mostly no-op change bu
1 - 100 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
