Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17446
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15332
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75347/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15332
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15332
**[Test build #75347 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75347/testReport)**
for PR 15332 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17452
Yes it wouldn't work with shell expansion. I don't think that is the case
here but it is fine either way. Consistency is the most important thing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user zuotingbing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17452#discussion_r108623175
--- Diff: R/check-cran.sh ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ fi
if [ -d "$SPARK_JARS_DIR" ]; then
# Build a zip file containing the source package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17430
**[Test build #75351 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75351/testReport)**
for PR 17430 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17430
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user yaooqinn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17430#discussion_r108616336
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitSuite.scala ---
@@ -148,6 +148,17 @@ class SparkSubmitSuite
appArgs.childArgs
Github user BenFradet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r108613380
--- Diff: docs/ml-frequent-pattern-mining.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Frequent Pattern Mining
+displayTitle:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17419
> RDD = [2482 ~ 46150 ~ 48354] records / milli
the number is so varied?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17446
`null` should not be simply treated as a `false` literal in filter
estimation. Based on the definition, `Not(null)` should return `null`. If we
treat `null` as `false`, `Not(null)` will return
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436
**[Test build #75350 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75350/testReport)**
for PR 17436 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17465
**[Test build #75349 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75349/testReport)**
for PR 17465 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17450#discussion_r108607884
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -297,8 +297,8 @@ case class Lower(child:
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17465
cc @ericl, @bogdanrdc, @adrian-ionescu, @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17465
[SPARK-20136][SQL] Add num files and metadata operation timing to scan
operator metrics
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds explicit metadata operation timing and
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17446
**[Test build #75348 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75348/testReport)**
for PR 17446 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17446
[SPARK-17075][SQL][followup] Add Estimation of Constant Literal
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`FalseLiteral` and `TrueLiteral` should have been eliminated by
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17424
To document the functions available sounds good. But I am not sure if we
want to put this into test. Sounds like we use the test as document generator.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15332
**[Test build #75347 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75347/testReport)**
for PR 15332 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15332#discussion_r108604022
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -237,6 +238,30 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15332#discussion_r108603952
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaSuite.scala
---
@@ -965,6 +972,18 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17464
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75344/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75346/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75345/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17464
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17464
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17464
Merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17464
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17464
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75343/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17464
**[Test build #75343 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75343/testReport)**
for PR 17464 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17297
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17297
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75339/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17297
**[Test build #75339 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75339/testReport)**
for PR 17297 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17415#discussion_r108601698
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -515,8 +530,138 @@ case
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324
**[Test build #75346 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75346/testReport)**
for PR 17324 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r108600468
--- Diff: docs/ml-frequent-pattern-mining.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Frequent Pattern Mining
+displayTitle:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17436
**[Test build #75345 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75345/testReport)**
for PR 17436 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17464
**[Test build #75344 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75344/testReport)**
for PR 17464 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17464#discussion_r108600240
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -477,9 +477,11 @@ private case class MyPlan(sc:
Github user kunalkhamar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17379
cc @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17464#discussion_r108596378
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -477,9 +477,11 @@ private case class MyPlan(sc:
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17324#discussion_r108597395
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaImputerExample.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17379
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75338/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17379
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17379
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17379
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75337/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17379
**[Test build #75338 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75338/testReport)**
for PR 17379 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17379
**[Test build #75337 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75337/testReport)**
for PR 17379 at commit
301 - 353 of 353 matches
Mail list logo
