Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000#discussion_r117030781
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -108,6 +116,15 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000#discussion_r117061432
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -47,39 +49,45 @@ import
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000#discussion_r117061359
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -166,7 +166,14 @@ private[parquet]
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000#discussion_r117030310
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -47,39 +49,45 @@ import
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
LGTM pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
**[Test build #77023 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77023/testReport)**
for PR 18014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77023/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005#discussion_r117029865
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetWriteSupport.scala
---
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ private[parquet]
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
+1 on Sean's comment. This is **not** a parser issue. Can you just fix this
by adding `LongType` to `Ceil.inputTypes`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
**[Test build #77024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77024/testReport)**
for PR 18014 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
@MLnick I think those hierarchy design can be put into later PR to avoid
this PR too complex.. The things current PR considering are satisfying
blor/mlor summary hierarchy and training summary
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
FYI. Can't merge in the moment - give me a day or 2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005#discussion_r117029723
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetWriteSupport.scala
---
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ private[parquet]
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
@vanzin I modified the test with sleep for SparkApp to run.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17980
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000#discussion_r117026406
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -166,7 +166,14 @@ private[parquet] object
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000#discussion_r11703
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -108,6 +116,15 @@ class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
I don't think we should support `void` type in the parser, `CREATE TABLE
t(a void)` should still be illegal.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user tpoterba commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
I used this script to generate random CSV files:
```python
import uuid
import sys
try:
print('args = ' + str(sys.argv))
filename = sys.argv[1]
cols =
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18003
Thanks for the update. I will work on better examples on these functions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77017/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
**[Test build #77017 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77017/testReport)**
for PR 18014 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
What do you mean by catalyst blew up?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18017
Looks ok; most seem to be ml or sql which I don't monitor very closely.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tpoterba commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
Others on my team suggest that the >64k bytecode issue has been fixed
already (and ported to a 2.1 maintenance release as well)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77020 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77020/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
**[Test build #77018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77018/testReport)**
for PR 18005 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18019
**[Test build #77015 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77015/testReport)**
for PR 18019 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #77022 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77022/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #77014 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77014/testReport)**
for PR 15435 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17980
**[Test build #77019 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77019/testReport)**
for PR 17980 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
**[Test build #77021 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77021/testReport)**
for PR 17308 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18018
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18015
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
**[Test build #77017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77017/testReport)**
for PR 18014 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18017
**[Test build #77016 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77016/testReport)**
for PR 18017 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999
**[Test build #77025 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77025/testReport)**
for PR 17999 at commit
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17988
I took another look and I think it is OK how it is. If we were to [actually
run the
Github user tpoterba commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
Addressed comments.
I tried to get some benchmark stats for this code:
```python
spark.read.csv(text_file).write.mode('overwrite').parquet(parquet_path)
```
I wanted to
GitHub user wangyum opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18019
[SPARK-20748][SQL] Add built-in SQL function CH[A]R.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add built-in SQL function `CH[A]R`:
For `CHR(bigint|double n)`, returns the ASCII
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
**[Test build #77023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77023/testReport)**
for PR 18014 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77014/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
**[Test build #77014 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77014/testReport)**
for PR 15435 at commit
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18020
[SPARK-20700][SQL] InferFiltersFromConstraints stackoverflows for query (v2)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the previous approach we used `aliasMap` to link an
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117077446
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117077304
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117076256
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77021/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18020
**[Test build #77027 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77027/testReport)**
for PR 18020 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17980
**[Test build #77019 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77019/testReport)**
for PR 17980 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18017
**[Test build #77016 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77016/testReport)**
for PR 18017 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
**[Test build #77026 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77026/testReport)**
for PR 18000 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18019#discussion_r117076510
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1268,6 +1268,59 @@ case class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117077740
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSource.scala
---
@@ -70,13 +70,13 @@ import
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117078211
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaWriter.scala
---
@@ -94,4 +94,10 @@ private[kafka010] object
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117077390
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117077248
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117076015
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117077673
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #77022 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77022/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77022/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18021
LGTM. Nice catch!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
**[Test build #77021 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77021/testReport)**
for PR 17308 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77020/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
@hvanhovell @sameeragarwal would it be possible to look at this?
cc: @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18020
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77027/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18020
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
**[Test build #77024 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77024/testReport)**
for PR 18014 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999
**[Test build #77025 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77025/testReport)**
for PR 17999 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17999
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77025/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16893
@HyukjinKwon, we can close this because its optimizations were incorporated
into SPARK-17647 (I ran the benchmarks to verify this, too). I'm going to
resolve this JIRA as fixed by that one as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18020
**[Test build #77027 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77027/testReport)**
for PR 18020 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18020#discussion_r117065814
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/InferFiltersFromConstraintsSuite.scala
---
@@ -172,30 +173,27 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18021
**[Test build #77028 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77028/testReport)**
for PR 18021 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
**[Test build #77018 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77018/testReport)**
for PR 18005 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18005
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77018/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
**[Test build #77026 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77026/testReport)**
for PR 18000 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18019
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18019
**[Test build #77015 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77015/testReport)**
for PR 18019 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77026/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18019
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77015/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18002
**[Test build #77029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77029/testReport)**
for PR 18002 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17980
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77019/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17980
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77024/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18014
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18000
@viirya, I addressed your comments. Could you take another look when you
have sometime?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18021
cc @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18021
[SPARK-20788][Core]Fix the Executor task reaper's false alarm warning logs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Executor task reaper may fail to detect if a task is finished
1 - 100 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
