Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18031
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117399877
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1230,24 +1230,49 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117399885
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1230,24 +1230,49 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17955#discussion_r117388447
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1233,17 +1223,6 @@ class DAGScheduler(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
**[Test build #77068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77068/testReport)**
for PR 18023 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
**[Test build #77073 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77073/testReport)**
for PR 18016 at commit
Github user yssharma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
@budde @brkyvz would love to hear your thoughts if this is the best way to
add this functionality
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #77075 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77075/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971#discussion_r117392683
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -414,6 +415,50 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971#discussion_r117393090
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -215,6 +218,215 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117397712
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/unresolved.scala
---
@@ -84,6 +84,33 @@ case class
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117399399
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -1230,24 +1230,49 @@ class AstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117402025
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -795,6 +795,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117402094
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -795,6 +795,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117402527
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParserUtils.scala
---
@@ -177,6 +177,18 @@ object ParserUtils {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77077/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #77080 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77080/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
**[Test build #77081 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77081/testReport)**
for PR 18023 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
Like what we did for `*` in `Column.scala`, we also need to handle the
Dataset APIs. You can follow the way we handle star there.
```Scala
df.select(df("(a|b)?+.+"))
```
---
If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117402461
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -795,6 +795,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117403303
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -795,6 +795,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117403331
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -795,6 +795,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
**[Test build #77077 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77077/testReport)**
for PR 18016 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18011
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77076/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18011
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r117403590
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParserUtils.scala
---
@@ -177,6 +177,18 @@ object ParserUtils {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18011
**[Test build #77076 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77076/testReport)**
for PR 18011 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r117403987
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -912,3 +913,10 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r117404192
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -166,14 +166,15 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r117404229
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1741,7 +1744,7 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
def union(other:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r117404204
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2470,6 +2480,13 @@ object CleanupAliases extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
**[Test build #77078 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77078/testReport)**
for PR 18016 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770#discussion_r117404393
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -187,6 +187,9 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18016
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77078/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
It seems to me that we won't want to show `AnalysisBarrier` in analyzed
plan, unlike `SubqueryAlias`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17770
**[Test build #77082 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77082/testReport)**
for PR 17770 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77039/
Test FAILed.
---
401 - 441 of 441 matches
Mail list logo
