Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18039
**[Test build #77117 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77117/testReport)**
for PR 18039 at commit
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18039
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#discussion_r117604491
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -510,6 +510,69 @@ public UTF8String trim() {
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
**[Test build #77118 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77118/testReport)**
for PR 17298 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117605187
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CanonicalizeKafkaParamsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117605188
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CanonicalizeKafkaParamsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18038
It still leads to the underlying issue. Why remove?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18042
**[Test build #77119 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77119/testReport)**
for PR 18042 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
**[Test build #77122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77122/testReport)**
for PR 17298 at commit
GitHub user MLnick opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18043
[SPARK-20506][DOCS] Add HTML links to highlight list
Quick follow up to #17996 - forgot to add the HTML links to the relevant
sections of the guide in the highlights list.
## How was this
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17996
I actually realized I forgot to add the HTML links to the relevant guide
sections in the highlight list - opened a little PR at #18043 to fix that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967
@felixcheung @HyukjinKwon Thanks much for pointing out the documentation
issues.
I still prefer to have a table to clearly illustrate what each option is
doing.
Made a new commit to
GitHub user LantaoJin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18041
[SPARK-20816][CORE] MetricsConfig doen't trim the properties file cauâ¦
â¦se the exception very confused
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967
(FWIW, `{{{ ... }}}` should work for Javadoc too given my past try -
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15999#discussion_r89580586)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18022
**[Test build #3745 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3745/testReport)**
for PR 18022 at commit
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18042
[SPARK-20817][core] Benchmark.getProcessorName() returns "Unknown
processor" on ppc and 390 platforms
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes that
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17996
@felixcheung ok - the KMeans behavior change was in 2.1 actually (so not in
this migration guide, in this PR it was moved to the "old versions migration
guides" page).
For `spark.lda` issue
GitHub user NewBoLing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18044
Branch 2.2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18039
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18039
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77113/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77115/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18039
It's a followup pr for
[SPARK-20751](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bff021dfaf4b5c9ab84c71dad2a37f60907e32d6).
Could you add a followup tag in the title?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77116/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967
**[Test build #77116 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77116/testReport)**
for PR 17967 at commit
GitHub user jrshust opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18040
[SPARK-20815] [SPARKR] NullPointerException in
RPackageUtils#checkManifestForR
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add a null check to RPackageUtils#checkManifestForR so
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18010
Per comment in the JIRA, I don't think this should be added.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18031#discussion_r117605849
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -193,8 +219,27 @@ private[spark] object HighlyCompressedMapStatus {
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
**[Test build #77120 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77120/testReport)**
for PR 17298 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18043
**[Test build #77123 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77123/testReport)**
for PR 18043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18043
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77123/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18043
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18040
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18041
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18031#discussion_r117606196
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -121,48 +126,69 @@ private[spark] class CompressedMapStatus(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17923
**[Test build #3743 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3743/testReport)**
for PR 17923 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17869
**[Test build #3744 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3744/testReport)**
for PR 17869 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18043
**[Test build #77123 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77123/testReport)**
for PR 18043 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18044
@NewBoLing close this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18044
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117604874
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -683,6 +685,17 @@ class StreamExecution(
}
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117605102
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSink.scala
---
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ import java.{util => ju}
import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18039
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77117/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18039
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18039
**[Test build #77117 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77117/testReport)**
for PR 18039 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978
LGTM @felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r117604954
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17967
**[Test build #77116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77116/testReport)**
for PR 17967 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18031#discussion_r117605781
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -193,8 +219,27 @@ private[spark] object HighlyCompressedMapStatus {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r117606109
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -278,4 +278,21 @@ package object config {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77118/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
**[Test build #77118 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77118/testReport)**
for PR 17298 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18025
@felixcheung
I'm curious what is the motivation to remove the style `avg,Column-method`?
This is the default and preferred (I believe) way to reference to S4
methods in R.
Suppose
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18034#discussion_r117606918
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -468,7 +469,16 @@ object LocalLDAModel extends Loader[LocalLDAModel]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #77121 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77121/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18041
Why do you think this relates to trimming whitespace?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user barrybecker4 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17558
I just checked out the spark branch-2.1 branch. I can build everything
successfully if I do not run the tests, but if I run the tests, I see this unit
test failure:
{code}
add jar
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17150
**[Test build #77124 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77124/testReport)**
for PR 17150 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18045
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18022
**[Test build #3745 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3745/testReport)**
for PR 18022 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17869
**[Test build #3744 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3744/testReport)**
for PR 17869 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899
**[Test build #77126 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77126/testReport)**
for PR 17899 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77121/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
@gatorsmile ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #77121 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77121/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
@gatorsmile ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77126/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user barrybecker4 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17558
The 3rd time I ran, it ran for 42 minutes, and failed further on in
catalyst tests. Like you say, it does seem that the tests are flaky, but why?
The failures seem so random.
```
Github user szalai1 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17435
@holdenk I am happy to contribute to this project. I changed the error
message and added a test case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17940#discussion_r117592116
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/Matrices.scala
---
@@ -992,7 +992,16 @@ object Matrices {
new DenseMatrix(dm.rows,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17923
**[Test build #3743 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3743/testReport)**
for PR 17923 at commit
Github user fjh100456 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17923
Yes, I've fixed the use case and bugs. @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18045
Please read http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html and fix the title
Does it make sense to send updateP twice?
Maybe @ankurdave can return to comment
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18031#discussion_r117610528
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -193,8 +219,27 @@ private[spark] object HighlyCompressedMapStatus {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18040
**[Test build #77128 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77128/testReport)**
for PR 18040 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18037
**[Test build #77129 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77129/testReport)**
for PR 18037 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #77125 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77125/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17923
Oh @fjh100456 actually this test failure is legitimate, not due to recent
Jenkins problems. The UI test needs to reflect the new display.
`Cause:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17982
Darn. I don't know if this is going to work. I'm closing this for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18032
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17982
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user barrybecker4 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17558
I ran it again, and got a different failure this time. Still in the core
module, but not sure if its before or after the tests that failed the first
time.
```
- caching in memory,
Github user LantaoJin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18041
@srowen It's not a real normal class not found case. And I do know what
happened here. What I point out is a case that a whitespace at the end of the
class name will cause ClassNotFound
Github user lys0716 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18038
Sorry, it is duplicate to https://github.com/antlr/antlr4/issues/773. But
on the second thought, the rule is still a workaround for that issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77122/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978
One minor optional comment, but not a blocker so LGTM (although if you
decide to update the docstring LGTM pending tests).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17978#discussion_r117612782
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -2111,26 +2112,45 @@ class StringIndexer(JavaEstimator, HasInputCol,
HasOutputCol, HasHandleInvalid,
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17435
Thanks for working on this. I feel like the error message could maybe be
improved to suggest what the user should be doing? It would be nicer to
eventually not have this depend on DataType since we
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17150
**[Test build #77124 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77124/testReport)**
for PR 17150 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #77125 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77125/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77125/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17298
**[Test build #77122 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77122/testReport)**
for PR 17298 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18031#discussion_r117610285
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -193,8 +219,27 @@ private[spark] object HighlyCompressedMapStatus {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17150
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77124/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
