Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80145/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742
**[Test build #80145 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80145/testReport)**
for PR 18742 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18806#discussion_r130777347
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1638,7 +1638,7 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
For
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18807
These are maven-compiler-plugin configurations. We don't use
maven-compiler-plugin to compile Java code:
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/74cda94c5e496e29f42f1044aab90cab7dbe9d38
---
If
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18780
Please take [SPARK-21287] out.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18800
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18800
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80131/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18804#discussion_r130783022
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -642,8 +642,15 @@ private[spark] class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18804#discussion_r130783003
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -642,8 +642,15 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18796
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18796
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80124/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
**[Test build #80126 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80126/testReport)**
for PR 18798 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468
**[Test build #80128 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80128/testReport)**
for PR 18468 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18799
**[Test build #80129 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80129/testReport)**
for PR 18799 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18799
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80129/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18800#discussion_r130704709
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -376,6 +385,13 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18800#discussion_r130704669
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ private[sql] object JDBCRelation
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18791
Overall I like this as an option and the code looks good. Personally I use
one log directory for all my logs (not just the SHS) so this wouldn't work for
me, but I also run into dead files
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18796
**[Test build #80124 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80124/testReport)**
for PR 18796 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18708
Actually, spotted something...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130746993
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18749
**[Test build #80123 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80123/testReport)**
for PR 18749 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18708
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18801
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18803
[SPARK-21597][SS]Fix a potential overflow issue in EventTimeStats
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixed a potential overflow issue in EventTimeStats.
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18696
I'll wait until tomorrow for a review, otherwise I'll push this to unblock
further work on this code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user wesm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
For item 2, in Arrow-land if the data is time zone aware, then it must be
internally normalized to UTC. Conversions are therefore metadata-only
operations and do not require any computation. The
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18800
**[Test build #80130 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80130/testReport)**
for PR 18800 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18796
+1, LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18799
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18800
**[Test build #80131 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80131/testReport)**
for PR 18800 at commit
Github user 2ooom commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18783
Could we try to run tests and build on Jenkins?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18800
**[Test build #80130 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80130/testReport)**
for PR 18800 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18695
Thanks for clarification. LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user MrBago commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17373#discussion_r130747030
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/ann/Layer.scala ---
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ private[ann] trait TopologyModel extends Serializable {
*
Github user MrBago commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17373#discussion_r130746928
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/ann/Layer.scala ---
@@ -463,7 +479,7 @@ private[ml] class FeedForwardModel private(
private var
Github user MrBago commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17373#discussion_r130747996
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifierSuite.scala
---
@@ -82,6 +83,23 @@ class
Github user MrBago commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17373#discussion_r130746665
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/ann/Layer.scala ---
@@ -463,7 +479,7 @@ private[ml] class FeedForwardModel private(
private var
Github user christiam commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18795#discussion_r130706349
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -330,6 +331,10 @@ Note that Spark artifacts are tagged with a Scala
version.
Simple Project
jar
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80128/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user dmvieira opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18802
[SPARK-18535][SPARK-19720][CORE][BACKPORT-2.1] Redact sensitive information
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Backporting SPARK-18535 and SPARK-19720 to spark 2.1
Github user dmvieira commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18765#discussion_r130733138
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2571,6 +2572,23 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
Github user jsoltren commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18395
This looks fine to me. Though, I did have to ask Marcelo a number of
questions along the way to clarify what all was going on here. Maybe some of
the points I mention below should make their way
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18803
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18695
@holdenk, BTW, it looks I am facing the same issue you met before. Sounds I
can't trigger the Jenkins build by "ok to test". Do you maybe know who I should
ask and or some steps that I should
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18797
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80125/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18797
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18791#discussion_r130712378
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala
---
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ class FsHistoryProviderSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18790
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80127/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18790
**[Test build #80127 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80127/testReport)**
for PR 18790 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18790
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18783
**[Test build #80133 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80133/testReport)**
for PR 18783 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18803
**[Test build #80132 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80132/testReport)**
for PR 18803 at commit
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130742759
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130742524
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130742836
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130742319
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130741880
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742#discussion_r130745275
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/util.py ---
@@ -283,3 +289,124 @@ def numFeatures(self):
Returns the number of features the model was trained
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130746893
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
@thunterdb
1) The dataframe deserialize from binary data will add overhead, (maybe
there is compaction or not, it depends on the datatype, cc @liancheng ) about
1x performance in my test.
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18749
@srowen, @rxin and @cloud-fan, I am confident for the compatibility concern
per https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18749#issuecomment-319364607 and
believe it is ready for another look.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18749
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80123/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18749
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18708
Merging to master / 2.2. I'll fix a style nit while merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18745
Can you add `[test-maven]` to the PR title so it builds with maven?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130741348
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
**[Test build #80134 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80134/testReport)**
for PR 18664 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18797
**[Test build #80125 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80125/testReport)**
for PR 18797 at commit
GitHub user Victsm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18801
SPARK-10878 Fix race condition when multiple clients resolves artifacts at
the same time
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When multiple clients attempt to resolve
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18802
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18783
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user thunterdb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
Thank you for the performance numbers @WeichenXu123 , I have a couple of
comments:
- you say that SQL uses adaptive compaction. How bad is that? I assume it
adds some overhead.
- did
Github user thunterdb closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17419
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user thunterdb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
cc @hvanhovell as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130742933
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18695
Thanks. Merged to mater.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130743131
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/SummarizerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,619 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18695
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80126/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
performance data attached. cc @thunterdb @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18664
To Wes's concern, I think we are only dealing with values in UTC here, both
Spark and Arrow internally represents timestamp as microseconds since epoch.
To the two issues Bryan and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18800
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80130/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18800
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user thunterdb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17419
I am going to close this PR, since this is being taken over by
@WeichenXu123 in #18798 .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user ajaysaini725 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18742#discussion_r130741050
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/util.py ---
@@ -283,3 +289,124 @@ def numFeatures(self):
Returns the number of features the model was trained
Github user ericvandenbergfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18791#discussion_r130743830
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala
---
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ class FsHistoryProviderSuite
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798#discussion_r130747756
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,633 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18796
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18793
**[Test build #80121 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80121/testReport)**
for PR 18793 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #80117 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80117/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user highfei2011 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18783
It looks a lot simpler.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18786
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80120/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18786
**[Test build #80120 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80120/testReport)**
for PR 18786 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18793
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80117/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18793
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80121/
Test PASSed.
---
201 - 300 of 404 matches
Mail list logo
