Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
**[Test build #83589 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83589/testReport)**
for PR 19689 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19690
**[Test build #83590 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83590/testReport)**
for PR 19690 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83587/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19690
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83588/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83586/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19681
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83585/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
**[Test build #83587 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83587/testReport)**
for PR 19683 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
**[Test build #83584 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83584/testReport)**
for PR 19689 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
**[Test build #83586 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83586/testReport)**
for PR 19607 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19681
**[Test build #83585 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83585/testReport)**
for PR 19681 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19690
**[Test build #83588 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83588/testReport)**
for PR 19690 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19681
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83584/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19690
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19690
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
**[Test build #83591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83591/testReport)**
for PR 19689 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
**[Test build #83592 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83592/testReport)**
for PR 19607 at commit
Github user mpetruska commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19659#discussion_r149600715
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/extensions/seq/package.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user uzadude commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19683
Do you understand this failure?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19694
**[Test build #83595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83595/testReport)**
for PR 19694 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607#discussion_r149655172
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -557,7 +577,13 @@ def createDataFrame(self, data, schema=None,
samplingRatio=None, verifySchema=Tr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
**[Test build #83593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83593/testReport)**
for PR 19607 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19640#discussion_r149661121
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkHadoopUtil.scala
---
@@ -426,6 +426,8 @@ class SparkHadoopUtil extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19573
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19573
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83594/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19685
@srowen I tried enabling native BLAS, but native BLAS implementation is
still much slower: average on 10 runs is 2529,922753 ms against 515,510185 ms
of the for loop. As a reference, I am using a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19694
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19694
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83595/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yaooqinn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19688
@jerryshao PR description added. I notice that this is small, but they seem
to be different issues.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19675
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
**[Test build #83591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83591/testReport)**
for PR 19689 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19662
thanks, merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
**[Test build #83592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83592/testReport)**
for PR 19607 at commit
Github user zivanfi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19250
Hive and Impala introduced the following workaround for timestamp
interoperability a long ago: The footer of the Parquet file contains metadata
about the library that wrote the file. For Hive and
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19695#discussion_r149649386
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -130,6 +130,10 @@ else
fi
fi
+LSOF=lsof
+if ! hash $LSOF 2>/dev/null; then
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19694
**[Test build #83595 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83595/testReport)**
for PR 19694 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19459#discussion_r149626358
--- Diff: python/pyspark/serializers.py ---
@@ -213,7 +213,15 @@ def __repr__(self):
return "ArrowSerializer"
-def
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19687#discussion_r149632280
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoderSuite.scala
---
@@ -370,7 +372,7 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83591/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19695#discussion_r149651615
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -130,6 +130,10 @@ else
fi
fi
+LSOF=lsof
+if ! hash $LSOF 2>/dev/null;
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19250
IIUC, using the `parquet.timezone-adjustment` table property requires
changing the writer. e.g. Impala creates a table and Hive wants to write data
to it, then Hive needs to write
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83593/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19693
Personally I don't think we should take the file open/close time into
account, cc @cloud-fan .
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19685
**[Test build #83598 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83598/testReport)**
for PR 19685 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
**[Test build #83593 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83593/testReport)**
for PR 19607 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19664#discussion_r149633100
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflectionSuite.scala
---
@@ -335,4 +338,17 @@ class ScalaReflectionSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19690
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19690
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83590/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
**[Test build #83589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83589/testReport)**
for PR 19689 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19689
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83589/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19156#discussion_r149641764
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -527,27 +570,28 @@ private[ml] object SummaryBuilderImpl extends Logging
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19695
cc @holdenk and @xynny, mind taking a look please?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19573
**[Test build #83594 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83594/testReport)**
for PR 19573 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19687#discussion_r149627183
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoderSuite.scala
---
@@ -441,4 +443,28 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19643
**[Test build #83596 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83596/testReport)**
for PR 19643 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19643#discussion_r149641601
--- Diff: python/pyspark/context.py ---
@@ -860,6 +860,23 @@ def addPyFile(self, path):
import importlib
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19156#discussion_r149641398
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/Summarizer.scala ---
@@ -94,46 +97,86 @@ object Summarizer extends Logging {
* - min: the
Github user liutang123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19692#discussion_r149659840
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19649
not sure, but maybe do it in a new PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19692#discussion_r149639379
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83592/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19695
[SPARK-22377][BUILD] Use /usr/sbin/lsof if lsof does not exists in
release-build.sh
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to use `/usr/sbin/lsof` if
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19695#discussion_r149652048
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -130,6 +130,10 @@ else
fi
fi
+LSOF=lsof
+if ! hash $LSOF 2>/dev/null;
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19607#discussion_r149661483
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -557,7 +577,13 @@ def createDataFrame(self, data, schema=None,
samplingRatio=None, verifySchema=Tr
Github user yaooqinn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19688
not familiar with dos cmd, plz review again @jiangxb1987 @srowen , thanks
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user ManchesterUnited16 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19687
java.io.NotSerializableException:
scala.reflect.api.TypeTags$PredefTypeCreator
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19687
LGTM, is it targeted for branch 2.2 too?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19687#discussion_r149630182
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoderSuite.scala
---
@@ -441,4 +443,28 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19690
**[Test build #83590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83590/testReport)**
for PR 19690 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19573
**[Test build #83594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83594/testReport)**
for PR 19573 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19479#discussion_r149678221
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -275,6 +317,98 @@ object ColumnStat extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19696
**[Test build #83600 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83600/testReport)**
for PR 19696 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19695
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83597/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19695
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19479
> We should also consider how to show the histogram in ANALYZE COLUMN, for
debug purpose.
Do you mean show the histogram in DESC COLUMN command?
---
Github user zivanfi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19250
Yes, you understand correctly, the table property affects both the read
path and the write path, while the current workaround used by Hive and Impala
only affects the read path. (Both are
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19688
cc @HyukjinKwon
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19685
**[Test build #83598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83598/testReport)**
for PR 19685 at commit
GitHub user mgaido91 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19696
[SPARK-22473][TEST] Replace deprecated AsyncAssertions.Waiter and methods
of java.sql.Date
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In `spark-sql` module tests there are
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19643
**[Test build #83596 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83596/testReport)**
for PR 19643 at commit
Github user mpetruska commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19659#discussion_r149690477
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/NGram.scala ---
@@ -42,11 +42,22 @@ class NGram @Since("1.5.0") (@Since("1.5.0") override
val
Github user mpetruska commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19659#discussion_r149696337
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/extensions/seq/package.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19685
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19685
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83598/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19479
**[Test build #83599 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83599/testReport)**
for PR 19479 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19643
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19643
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83596/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19695
**[Test build #83597 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/83597/testReport)**
for PR 19695 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19695
I realized that some OSs puts `lsof` into /usr/bin and other OSs put `lsof`
into `/usr/sbin`.
Could you apply this to `dev/run-tests.py`, too?
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19555
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19681
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
1 - 100 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
