Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
**[Test build #85160 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85160/testReport)**
for PR 19884 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20031
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20031
**[Test build #85177 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85177/testReport)**
for PR 20031 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20031
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85177/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20020
**[Test build #85161 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85161/testReport)**
for PR 20020 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85164/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954
> I don't think they are independent as architecturally they make sense
together and represent a single concern: enabling use of remote dependencies
through init-containers. Missing any one of the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85165/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
**[Test build #85165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85165/testReport)**
for PR 19884 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #85181 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85181/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19991
@holdenk @sethah any other comments?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
> I checked some call sites. Here is one example that `extraArguments` has
`ev.value` instead of local variable.
Hey, `ev.value` is not from children, it's the output of the current
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977#discussion_r158004864
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -566,6 +568,21 @@ object TypeCoercion {
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977#discussion_r158005532
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -566,6 +568,21 @@ object TypeCoercion {
}
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
Hi @brkyvz, could you take a look please?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
Ideally we should not change behaviors as possible as we can, but since
this behavior is from Hive and Hive also changed it, might be OK to follow Hive
and also change it? cc @hvanhovell too
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
**[Test build #85184 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85184/testReport)**
for PR 19498 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
@cloud-fan yes, Hive changed and most important at the moment we are not
compliant with SQL standard. So currently Spark is returning results which are
different from Hive and not compliant with
Github user sujithjay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20002
@tgravescs , could you please take a look when you have some time ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
GitHub user foxish opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
[SPARK-22845] [Scheduler] Modify spark.kubernetes.allocation.batch.delay to
take time instead of int
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixing configuration that was
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
**[Test build #85185 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85185/testReport)**
for PR 20032 at commit
Github user foxish commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946#discussion_r158008588
--- Diff: docs/running-on-kubernetes.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,498 @@
+---
+layout: global
+title: Running Spark on Kubernetes
+---
+* This will
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
**[Test build #85181 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85181/testReport)**
for PR 18029 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85181/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user yashs360 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18029
Hi @brkyvz , I've added the new changes with the java classes. Had to make
the classes serializable for passing them to the KinesisReceiver. Please have a
look when you get time. Thanks.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
**[Test build #85167 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85167/testReport)**
for PR 19946 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85167/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
**[Test build #85185 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85185/testReport)**
for PR 20032 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85185/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85184/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
**[Test build #85184 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85184/testReport)**
for PR 19498 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
**[Test build #85172 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85172/testReport)**
for PR 20030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85172/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20030
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19904
**[Test build #85183 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85183/testReport)**
for PR 19904 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19904
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85183/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19904
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85186 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85186/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20021
Oh, you are right. I misunderstood. After our optimizations, output is also
a part of `arguments`. Let me check others again.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r158206309
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/utils.py ---
@@ -110,3 +110,12 @@ def toJArray(gateway, jtype, arr):
for i in range(0, len(arr)):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85232/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158210425
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +101,63 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158210374
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +101,63 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19954
I'll finish reading this by Friday, thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
I think the test failure is not related to this change, but the ongoing
work to upgrade pyarrow.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20041
checked the test case failure but I dont think its related to this PR.
```
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.parquet.ParquetQuerySuite.(It is
not a test it is a
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20041
Jenkins retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r158206546
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/utils.py ---
@@ -110,3 +110,12 @@ def toJArray(gateway, jtype, arr):
for i in range(0, len(arr)):
jarr[i]
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043
cc @kiszk @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r158208592
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2141,22 +2141,22 @@ def pandas_udf(f=None, returnType=None,
functionType=None):
>>>
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043#discussion_r158209659
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -56,7 +56,36 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043
**[Test build #85241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85241/testReport)**
for PR 20043 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
**[Test build #85242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85242/testReport)**
for PR 19884 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043#discussion_r158210849
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -56,7 +56,36 @@ import
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158210754
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +101,63 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
Github user zuotingbing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20029
It seems each time when connect to thrift server through beeline, the
`SessionState.start(state)` will be called two times. one is in
`HiveSessionImpl:open` , another is in
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Jenkins, retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19946#discussion_r158205893
--- Diff: docs/building-spark.md ---
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ To create a Spark distribution like those distributed by
the
to be runnable, use
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r158206051
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2141,22 +2141,22 @@ def pandas_udf(f=None, returnType=None,
functionType=None):
>>>
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023#discussion_r158205387
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DecimalType.scala ---
@@ -136,10 +137,54 @@ object DecimalType extends AbstractDataType {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023#discussion_r158205620
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DecimalType.scala ---
@@ -136,10 +137,54 @@ object DecimalType extends AbstractDataType {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023#discussion_r158206388
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DecimalType.scala ---
@@ -136,10 +137,54 @@ object DecimalType extends AbstractDataType {
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
I used a workaround for timestamp casts that allows the tests to pass for
me locally, and left a note to look into the root cause later. Hopefully this
should pass now and we will be good to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158210132
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +101,63 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158210714
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +101,63 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158210666
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +101,63 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
**[Test build #85244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85244/testReport)**
for PR 19884 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r158212056
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2141,22 +2141,23 @@ def pandas_udf(f=None, returnType=None,
functionType=None):
>>>
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85235/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19977
**[Test build #85235 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85235/testReport)**
for PR 19977 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
yea it's failing globally, I'm merging this PR, thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043
**[Test build #85232 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85232/testReport)**
for PR 20043 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
**[Test build #85233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85233/testReport)**
for PR 20008 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20008
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85233/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20043
**[Test build #85243 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85243/testReport)**
for PR 20043 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884#discussion_r158211101
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2141,22 +2141,23 @@ def pandas_udf(f=None, returnType=None,
functionType=None):
>>>
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85237/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20036
**[Test build #85236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85236/testReport)**
for PR 20036 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85237/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20036
Jenkins, retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19981
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023#discussion_r158207539
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DecimalType.scala ---
@@ -136,10 +137,54 @@ object DecimalType extends AbstractDataType {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023#discussion_r158205829
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DecimalType.scala ---
@@ -136,10 +137,54 @@ object DecimalType extends AbstractDataType {
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023#discussion_r158205151
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/DecimalPrecision.scala
---
@@ -243,17 +248,43 @@ object DecimalPrecision
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023#discussion_r158206693
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DecimalType.scala ---
@@ -136,10 +137,54 @@ object DecimalType extends AbstractDataType {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85237/
Test FAILed.
---
101 - 200 of 659 matches
Mail list logo
