Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20199
Let's fix the PR title to `[SPARK-22967][TESTS]`.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For addi
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20199#discussion_r160396117
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite w
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14129
@cloud-fan I think this PR is to implement Hive's `histogram_numeric`
function. It produces a histogram to approximate data distribution. It's
different from standard equi-width or equi-height histogr
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20199
I met the similar case when I fixed some tests related with Kafka before -
https://issues-test.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1194. This took me a while to
debug and find this issue ..
T
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20199
I can trigger a test on Windows. Let me leave the build:
Build started: [SQL] `org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.VersionsSuite`
[![PR-20199](https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/gi
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20080
@srowen @jiangxb1987 I have test on my cluster with this patch.
```
bin/spark-sql --master yarn --conf spark.dynamicAllocation.enabled=true
--conf spark.shuffle.service.enabled=true --conf
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19492
I will be busy on relocating in next few days. I'll look into this further
if I have time in maybe weekend.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user Ngone51 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20199#discussion_r160404821
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
**[Test build #85850 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85850/testReport)**
for PR 20189 at commit
[`7242eab`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85850/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user Ngone51 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20199
Ok, will try.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@sp
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18853
**[Test build #85849 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85849/testReport)**
for PR 18853 at commit
[`e763330`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18853
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18853
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85849/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
[MINOR] fix a typo in BroadcastJoinSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec` should be `BroadcastHashJoinExec`
## How was this patch
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
cc @liufengdb @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: r
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20199#discussion_r160408416
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite w
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
**[Test build #85853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85853/testReport)**
for PR 20202 at commit
[`c615d37`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c6
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
thanks, merging to master/2.3! Let's address the comments in follow-up.
BTW @dongjoon-hyun let's keep our discussion on
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943#discussion_r160326383
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20176
LGTM, merging to master/2.3!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20176
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20140
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20176
Thanks! Next, I'll fix `showString` though, one question; currently casting
binary to string is different between
[Cast](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/2250cb75b99d257e698fe5418a51d8cddb4d5104/
GitHub user attilapiros opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20203
[SPARK-22577] [core] executor page blacklist status should update with
TaskSet level blacklisting
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this PR stage blacklisting is p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20203
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
**[Test build #85854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85854/testReport)**
for PR 20200 at commit
[`9cd590d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9c
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20176
hive one is the same with mysql one;
```
hive> create table t(a BINARY);
OK
hive> INSERT INTO t values('abc');
OK
hive> select CAST(a AS STRING) from t;
OK
abc
```
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
Thank you so much, @cloud-fan , @mmccline , @viirya , @henrify , @kiszk ,
@HyukjinKwon !
I'll proceed to follow-ups.
---
-
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943#discussion_r160432982
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcReadBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,435 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache So
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20171#discussion_r160441123
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -3616,6 +3616,34 @@ def test_vectorized_udf_basic(self):
bool_f(col('bool')))
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204#discussion_r160445389
--- Diff: python/run-tests.py ---
@@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ def main():
task_queue = Queue.PriorityQueue()
for python_exec in python_ex
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
[SPARK-7721][PYTHON][TESTS] Adds PySpark coverage generation script
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Note that this PR was made based on the top of
https://github.co
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
**[Test build #85851 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85851/testReport)**
for PR 20200 at commit
[`93a3d84`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
cc @rxin, @felixcheung, @ueshin, @holdenk and @JoshRosen. Here, I made it
based on #20151. Could you take a look for this one too? I can make this PR
separate from #20151 by manually adding the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
cc @icexelloss too. I think we had a small talk about this before.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
**[Test build #85855 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85855/testReport)**
for PR 20204 at commit
[`a3179d7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85851/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20201
**[Test build #85852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85852/testReport)**
for PR 20201 at commit
[`be14e3b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20201
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20201
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85852/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
**[Test build #85856 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85856/testReport)**
for PR 20204 at commit
[`9f2c400`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9f
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
[SPARK-16060][SQL][follow-up] add a wrapper solution for vectorized orc
reader
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is mostly from https://github.com/apache/spark/pul
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
cc @dongjoon-hyun @viirya @kiszk @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20163#discussion_r160450067
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/EvaluatePython.scala
---
@@ -120,10 +121,18 @@ object EvaluatePython {
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
This is awesome. Thanks @HyukjinKwon!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comman
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
**[Test build #85857 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85857/testReport)**
for PR 20205 at commit
[`bdf9dbf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bd
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
[SPARK-19256][SQL] Remove ordering enforcement from `FileFormatWriter` and
let planner do that
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Thks is as per discussion in
https:/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
**[Test build #85858 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85858/testReport)**
for PR 20204 at commit
[`3c3c3cb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
**[Test build #85859 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85859/testReport)**
for PR 20206 at commit
[`652dca2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/65
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
[SPARK-23000] [FOLLOW-UP] Fix Flaky test suite
DataSourceWithHiveMetastoreCatalogSuite in Spark 2.3 [WIP]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Tried to reproduce it.
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
**[Test build #85860 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85860/testReport)**
for PR 20207 at commit
[`f239b2b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
**[Test build #85861 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85861/testReport)**
for PR 20189 at commit
[`b7dc922`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b7
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205#discussion_r160461130
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcColumnarBatchReader.java
---
@@ -196,17 +234,26 @@ public void ini
Github user RussellSpitzer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20190
@zsxwing I think you were the last to touch this code, could you please
review?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-uns
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
**[Test build #85853 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85853/testReport)**
for PR 20202 at commit
[`c615d37`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85853/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20080
This change alone is pretty harmless. If it seems to work as intended,
seems OK? Again, just wondering if `cachedExecutorIdleTimeoutS` should be the
same, and check for nonnegative values?
---
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
BTW, if you don't mind, could you update the followings? It's @viirya 's
comment, so I made a followup, but we had better have this in your PR. To make
another follow-up is overkill. :)
``
Github user liufengdb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20202
thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20158
Ping @rednaxelafx
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h..
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20153#discussion_r160472490
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ColumnarBatchScan.scala
---
@@ -137,4 +147,25 @@ private[sql] trait ColumnarBatchScan extend
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r160475752
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/AppStatusStore.scala
---
@@ -110,107 +114,238 @@ private[spark] class AppStatusStore(
if (deta
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r160475833
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/storeTypes.scala ---
@@ -69,51 +71,271 @@ private[spark] class JobDataWrapper(
val skippedStage
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r160475957
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/AppStatusStore.scala
---
@@ -110,107 +114,238 @@ private[spark] class AppStatusStore(
if (deta
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013
> the memory usage will be much larger with InMemoryStore.
No it won't. The in-memory store does not use extra memory for indices. It
sorts the data when the index is read, and discards that
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20153
Is `ColumnarBatchScan` appropriate name for now? This is because if
`supportBatch` is false, the class handles scan from a `row`, not `columnar` or
`batch`.
---
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20153#discussion_r160477447
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/SupportsScanColumnarBatch.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20153#discussion_r160477594
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ColumnarBatchScan.scala
---
@@ -17,21 +17,24 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql.exec
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r160478184
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/LiveEntity.scala ---
@@ -119,118 +121,115 @@ private class LiveTask(
import LiveEntityHelpe
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20186
> I think it's fine. We usually don't test if a config can be correctly set
as it's so trivial...
The point is to test that the code using that config works as expected, not
that it can be s
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20179#discussion_r160481843
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/IndexShuffleBlockResolver.scala ---
@@ -196,11 +196,24 @@ private[spark] class IndexShuffleBlockRes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
Sorry for noice. I made some clean up and just rebased.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Fo
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20204
**[Test build #85862 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85862/testReport)**
for PR 20204 at commit
[`dadcae4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/da
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
**[Test build #85863 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85863/testReport)**
for PR 20023 at commit
[`6701a54`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/67
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
**[Test build #85864 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85864/testReport)**
for PR 20023 at commit
[`20616fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/20
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
I'd just suggest trying it. Since this PR is a patch for master, please
message me personally at m...@allman.ms to discuss progress and questions
on a backport to 2.2. If we get it working,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
**[Test build #85857 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85857/testReport)**
for PR 20205 at commit
[`bdf9dbf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20205
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85857/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
**[Test build #85859 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85859/testReport)**
for PR 20206 at commit
[`652dca2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85859/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20206
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r160486870
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/LiveEntity.scala ---
@@ -119,118 +121,115 @@ private class LiveTask(
import LiveEntityHelpe
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20179#discussion_r160489460
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/IndexShuffleBlockResolver.scala ---
@@ -196,11 +196,24 @@ private[spark] class IndexShuffleBlockRes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
**[Test build #85860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85860/testReport)**
for PR 20207 at commit
[`f239b2b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20208
[SPARK-23007][SQL][TEST] Add schema evolution test suite for file-based
data sources
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A schema can evolve in several ways and the f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85860/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20207
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20208
Hi, @gatorsmile , @cloud-fan , @HyukjinKwon , @viirya .
Could you review this PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20208
**[Test build #85865 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85865/testReport)**
for PR 20208 at commit
[`499801e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/49
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
**[Test build #85854 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85854/testReport)**
for PR 20200 at commit
[`9cd590d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85854/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20209
[SPARK-23008][ML] OnehotEncoderEstimator python API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
OnehotEncoderEstimator python API.
## How was this patch tested?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20209
**[Test build #85866 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85866/testReport)**
for PR 20209 at commit
[`f6215fc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f6
101 - 200 of 517 matches
Mail list logo