Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21302#discussion_r187762385
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilterSuite.scala
---
@@ -602,6 +602,16 @@ class
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Better compile time error. Plus a lot of people are already using these.
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:35 PM Hyukjin Kwon
wrote:
> Yup, then why not just
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21246#discussion_r187759378
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/maskExpressions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21301
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90532/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21301
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3165/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21302
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90536/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21302
**[Test build #90536 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90536/testReport)**
for PR 21302 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21302
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Thing is, I am a bit confused when to add it to other APIs. I thought if
it's expected to be less commonly used, it shouldn't be added at the first
place. We have UDFs.
I have been a
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
I am asking this to use the same judgement for when to add it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21296#discussion_r187762615
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/UnivocityParser.scala
---
@@ -73,11 +64,24 @@ class UnivocityParser(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
**[Test build #90537 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90537/testReport)**
for PR 21309 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90537/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Just had a short talk with Reynold. LGTM too. thanks for bearing with me.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21301
**[Test build #90538 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90538/testReport)**
for PR 21301 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90535/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
**[Test build #90535 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90535/testReport)**
for PR 21305 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21288#discussion_r187764083
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/FilterPushdownBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -32,14 +32,14 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{Benchmark,
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21301
@dongjoon-hyun thanks, done
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
**[Test build #90532 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90532/testReport)**
for PR 21306 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Yup, then why not just deprecate other functions in other APIs for 3.0.0,
and promote the usage of expr?
---
-
To
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21304
It's okay but mind quickly checking other typos around this place while we
are here?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21298#discussion_r187763906
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3138,6 +3139,23 @@ setMethod("size",
column(jc)
})
+#' @details
+#'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21301
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90538/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21301
**[Test build #90538 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90538/testReport)**
for PR 21301 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21301
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21298
lgtm too except that the nit.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
@rxin, how about splitting up this file by the group or something, or
deprecating all the functions that can be called via expr for 3.0.0? To me, it
looked a bit odd when some functions exist
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21296
Can we update the migration guide then? I want to see if the note makes
sense.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21308
**[Test build #90534 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90534/testReport)**
for PR 21308 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21308
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90534/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Adding it to sql would allow it to be available everywhere (through expr)
right?
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:30 PM Hyukjin Kwon
wrote:
> Thing is, I am
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21054#discussion_r187761743
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/functions.scala ---
@@ -775,6 +775,178 @@ object functions {
*/
def
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21054
There is not a single function that canât be called by expr. It mainly
adds
some type safety.
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:18 PM Hyukjin Kwon
wrote:
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Btw itâs been always the case that the less commonly used functions are
not
part of this file. There is just a lot of overhead to maintaining all of
them.
Iâm not even sure if the
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
[SPARK-23907] Removes regr_* functions in functions.scala
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch removes the various regr_* functions in functions.scala. They
are so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
**[Test build #90537 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90537/testReport)**
for PR 21309 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
cc @gatorsmile @mgaido91
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21276
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90525/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21276
**[Test build #90525 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90525/testReport)**
for PR 21276 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21276
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3164/
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21278
Merging this to master and branch-2.3
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21302
**[Test build #90527 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90527/testReport)**
for PR 21302 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21302
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21302
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90527/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21301
@kiszk . Could you run for all?
```
~/PR-21301:PR-21301$ dev/lint-java
exec: curl --progress-bar -L
https://downloads.typesafe.com/zinc/0.3.15/zinc-0.3.15.tgz
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21278
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21303
**[Test build #90526 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90526/testReport)**
for PR 21303 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21303
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21303
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90526/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3129/
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user fangshil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21276#discussion_r187540911
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2715,6 +2715,66 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
**[Test build #90499 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90499/testReport)**
for PR 21291 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291#discussion_r187529583
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2767,7 +2767,12 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* @since 1.6.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21118
**[Test build #90494 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90494/testReport)**
for PR 21118 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90496/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
**[Test build #90495 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90495/testReport)**
for PR 21291 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21118
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90494/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21255
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90493/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21255
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21255
**[Test build #90493 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90493/testReport)**
for PR 21255 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90495/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21129
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21129
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90492/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
**[Test build #90496 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90496/testReport)**
for PR 21291 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21118
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21129
**[Test build #90492 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90492/testReport)**
for PR 21129 at commit
Github user zheh12 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21286
I think the Hadoop design does not allow two jobs to share the same output
folder.
Hadoop has a related patch that can partially solve this problem. You can
configure the parameters to not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3130/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21276
**[Test build #90498 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90498/testReport)**
for PR 21276 at commit
Github user fangshil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21276
made a few changes:
since getSimpleName is a method of Class, it makes sense for
Utils.getSimpleName to takes a Class param
Utils.getSimpleName will try to use the Class's getSimpleName
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21243
**[Test build #90501 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90501/testReport)**
for PR 21243 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21129
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3133/
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291#discussion_r187565401
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2767,7 +2767,12 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* @since 1.6.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
**[Test build #90499 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90499/testReport)**
for PR 21291 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21293
**[Test build #90505 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90505/testReport)**
for PR 21293 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21106#discussion_r187528270
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/InterpretedUnsafeProjection.scala
---
@@ -87,12 +87,11 @@ class
Github user fangshil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21276#discussion_r187540472
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/UtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -1168,6 +1168,35 @@ class UtilsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user fangshil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21276#discussion_r187540452
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2715,6 +2715,66 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3131/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21216
**[Test build #90504 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90504/testReport)**
for PR 21216 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21216
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21216
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90504/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21293#discussion_r187598365
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkEnv.scala ---
@@ -227,6 +228,7 @@ object SparkEnv extends Logging {
1 - 100 of 410 matches
Mail list logo