Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21289
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21321
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3229/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21321
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
**[Test build #90626 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90626/testReport)**
for PR 21312 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21329
**[Test build #90631 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90631/testReport)**
for PR 21329 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21329
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user zecevicp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188250615
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -97,13 +100,13 @@ object PhysicalOperation extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21257
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90632/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21257
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21293#discussion_r188270290
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Dependency.scala ---
@@ -88,14 +90,53 @@ class ShuffleDependency[K: ClassTag, V: ClassTag, C:
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21293#discussion_r188273722
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -769,6 +796,43 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTrackerWorker(conf:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21329
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90631/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21329
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user zecevicp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188254046
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -131,13 +134,101 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user zecevicp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188253781
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -131,13 +134,101 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21327
**[Test build #90628 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90628/testReport)**
for PR 21327 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21028
**[Test build #90635 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90635/testReport)**
for PR 21028 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188264496
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -131,13 +134,101 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user zecevicp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188265911
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -434,18 +511,139 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21330
@cloud-fan @jiangxb1987 @cenyuhai
Do you think this change makes sense?
I can keep working on this.
---
-
To
Github user zecevicp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188258797
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -131,13 +134,101 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21257
**[Test build #90632 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90632/testReport)**
for PR 21257 at commit
Github user zecevicp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188265529
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -434,18 +511,139 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
GitHub user mgaido91 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21331
[SPARK-24276][SQL] Order of literals in IN should not affect semantic
equality
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When two `In` operators are created with the same list
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21331
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3232/
Github user pepinoflo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21208
Oops, not it's the wrong email address in these commits, I will amend them
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90626/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21317
Ok I could change that, its more flexible I agree to be able to provide a
custom name for the env var. I followed the initial description in the ticket
that is why I did it that way.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21312
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21114
**[Test build #90629 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90629/testReport)**
for PR 21114 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188241786
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -131,13 +134,101 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188242302
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -131,13 +134,101 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188243359
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -131,13 +134,101 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188246236
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -434,18 +511,139 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21114
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90629/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user zecevicp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188253438
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -97,13 +100,13 @@ object PhysicalOperation extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21330
**[Test build #90640 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90640/testReport)**
for PR 21330 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21331
**[Test build #90641 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90641/testReport)**
for PR 21331 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21327
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90628/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21028
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90635/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21246
**[Test build #90634 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90634/testReport)**
for PR 21246 at commit
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21293
@jose-torres Great thanks for you advise and guidance for us! I found the
main difference between us is whether we can reuse current implementation of
scheduler and shuffle. I marked in your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21289
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3228/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21208
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90633/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21208
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21329
**[Test build #90639 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90639/testReport)**
for PR 21329 at commit
Github user zecevicp commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188251314
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -131,13 +134,101 @@ object ExtractEquiJoinKeys extends
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109#discussion_r188266461
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -434,18 +511,139 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109
**[Test build #90642 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90642/testReport)**
for PR 21109 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21334
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21109
**[Test build #90642 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90642/testReport)**
for PR 21109 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
**[Test build #90646 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90646/testReport)**
for PR 21291 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21258
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3240/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21336
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21330
**[Test build #90640 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90640/testReport)**
for PR 21330 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21330
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90646/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3238/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21291
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21322
**[Test build #90651 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90651/testReport)**
for PR 21322 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3239/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21335
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90653/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21335
**[Test build #90653 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90653/testReport)**
for PR 21335 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21335
**[Test build #90655 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90655/testReport)**
for PR 21335 at commit
Github user jose-torres commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21337
@HeartSaVioR @arunmahadevan @xuanyuanking
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21330
cc @hvanhovell
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user rubenfiszel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21334
Improve ParseError stop location when offending symbol is a token
In the case where the offending symbol is a CommonToken, this PR increases
the accuracy of the start and stop origin by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21331
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90641/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21331
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
**[Test build #90649 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90649/testReport)**
for PR 21326 at commit
Github user jose-torres commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21332
We're definitely agreed on the broad idea of having a
ContinuousShuffleExchangeExec which reuses most of the existing
ShuffleExchangeExec.
As discussed in the other PR, I'm not sure
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21336
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user jose-torres opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21337
[SPARK-24234][SS] Reader for continuous processing shuffle
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Read RDD for continuous processing shuffle, as well as the initial
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21334
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20929
@maropu Thanks for the update! I saw some test failures, no sure if they
are relevant. Looking at the changes, I feel we don't need to handle the
streaming scenarios in the same PR. We just add a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21165
**[Test build #90643 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90643/testReport)**
for PR 21165 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21239
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
**[Test build #90650 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90650/testReport)**
for PR 21326 at commit
GitHub user ludatabricks opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21335
[SPARK-24231][PYSPARK][ML] Provide Python API for evaluateEachIteration
for spark.ml GBTs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add evaluateEachIteration for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21335
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user rohtakdev opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21336
[SPARK-24286][Documentation] DataFrameReader.csv - Add missing aliasâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Documentation misses out on an alias option available for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21337
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21158
That's fine, but I'm not going to wait indefinitely for their feedback.
They've already been pinged multiple times here and on jira to comment on this
issue.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21322
**[Test build #90652 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90652/testReport)**
for PR 21322 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21335
**[Test build #90653 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90653/testReport)**
for PR 21335 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326#discussion_r188354387
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/InputPartition.java
---
@@ -42,9 +43,9 @@
*
* Note that if a
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326#discussion_r188354590
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/v2/reader/InputPartition.java
---
@@ -42,9 +43,9 @@
*
* Note that if a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21165
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90643/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21165
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21258
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21337
**[Test build #90656 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90656/testReport)**
for PR 21337 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21258#discussion_r188401185
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ComplexTypeSuite.scala
---
@@ -186,6 +186,37 @@ class ComplexTypeSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21335
**[Test build #90657 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90657/testReport)**
for PR 21335 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21335
**[Test build #90658 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90658/testReport)**
for PR 21335 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21326
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21335
**[Test build #90657 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90657/testReport)**
for PR 21335 at commit
201 - 300 of 453 matches
Mail list logo
