Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21258#discussion_r192551411
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -235,6 +235,86 @@ case class
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21390
sounds like we need to have some sort of lifetime management, TTL -like
design shuffle file - should we have a new JIRA on that?
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21480
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21484
**[Test build #91414 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91414/testReport)**
for PR 21484 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21484
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21484
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3776/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21485
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user xueyumusic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21485
[SPARK-24455][CORE] fix typo in TaskSchedulerImpl comment
change runTasks to submitTasks in the TaskSchedulerImpl.scala 's comment
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21485
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21474#discussion_r192551649
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -429,7 +429,11 @@ package object config {
"external
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21476#discussion_r192551676
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala
---
@@ -1485,6 +1486,22 @@ private object Client extends
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21483
yea, that was my question. I think @mengxr actually meant that in the JIRA?
I'm okay eithrt way.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91410/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479
**[Test build #91415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91415/testReport)**
for PR 21479 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482#discussion_r192551752
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -907,6 +907,30 @@ setMethod("initcap",
column(jc)
})
+#' @details
+#'
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482#discussion_r192551777
--- Diff: R/pkg/NAMESPACE ---
@@ -281,6 +281,8 @@ exportMethods("%<=>%",
"initcap",
"input_file_name",
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21480
merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21484
[WIP] Replace queryExecution by planWithBarrier in toDF
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
TODO
## How was this patch tested?
TODO
You can merge this pull
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19602
**[Test build #91413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91413/testReport)**
for PR 19602 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19602
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91413/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
**[Test build #91410 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91410/testReport)**
for PR 21370 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91412/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479
**[Test build #91412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91412/testReport)**
for PR 21479 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19602
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3778/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21486
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482
**[Test build #91418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91418/testReport)**
for PR 21482 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21485
Minor changes don't need a JIRA. lets avoid next time btw.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21485
that's fine but mind taking another look and see if there are other typos
while we are here? I'm pretty sure there are more.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
**[Test build #91419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91419/testReport)**
for PR 21473 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3779/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21484
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21484
**[Test build #91414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91414/testReport)**
for PR 21484 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3777/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
**[Test build #91416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91416/testReport)**
for PR 21370 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3780/
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21481
cc @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91417/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user lirui-apache opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21486
[SPARK-24387][Core] Heartbeat-timeout executor is added back and used again
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When an executor's heartbeat is lost, we call
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21486
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
**[Test build #91420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91420/testReport)**
for PR 21473 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91415/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21479
**[Test build #91415 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91415/testReport)**
for PR 21479 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91416/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482
**[Test build #91418 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91418/testReport)**
for PR 21482 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91418/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482
**[Test build #91417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91417/testReport)**
for PR 21482 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21484
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91414/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21370
**[Test build #91416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91416/testReport)**
for PR 21370 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482
**[Test build #91417 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91417/testReport)**
for PR 21482 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91419/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
**[Test build #91419 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91419/testReport)**
for PR 21473 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346#discussion_r192565980
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/RpcHandler.java
---
@@ -38,15 +38,24 @@
*
* This method
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21313#discussion_r192564730
--- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1518,6 +1518,16 @@ test_that("column functions", {
result <- collect(select(df,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
**[Test build #91420 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91420/testReport)**
for PR 21473 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91420/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21473
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21313#discussion_r192564574
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3006,6 +3008,28 @@ setMethod("array_contains",
column(jc)
})
+#'
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21313#discussion_r192564618
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3006,6 +3008,28 @@ setMethod("array_contains",
column(jc)
})
+#'
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346#discussion_r192566116
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/client/TransportClient.java
---
@@ -141,26 +141,14 @@ public void fetchChunk(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21484#discussion_r192564074
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
*/
// This is
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21390
Feel free to do the TTL in a followup. My feeling is that it won't be super
useful in practice, though:
1. Cleanup of non-shuffle disk block manager files following executor exit
only
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21481
Hey @kiszk, thanks for tracking this down. This change looks good to me.
I have a couple of questions, mostly aimed towards figuring out how we can
categorically solve this problem:
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346#discussion_r192565530
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/protocol/UploadStream.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21456#discussion_r192567034
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockResolverSuite.java
---
@@ -135,4 +136,23 @@ public void
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21282
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91421/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
**[Test build #91424 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91424/testReport)**
for PR 21221 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91424/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21282
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user countmdm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21456#discussion_r192576365
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockResolverSuite.java
---
@@ -135,4 +136,23 @@ public
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21487
cc @maropu @gatorsmile
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21487
[SPARK-24369][SQL] Correct handling for multiple distinct aggregations
having the same argument set
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
bring back
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21487
**[Test build #91425 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91425/testReport)**
for PR 21487 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21487
also cc @vanzin , This is a bug fix that should be backported, but it's not
a regression and not critical, so it should not block the release. That said,
if the current RC passes, this fix will
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21481
+1 on @JoshRosen 's ideas.
I've already seen several overflow fixes from @kiszk , it will be good if
we have some tools to check it, even we need to run the tool manually. One idea
may
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21456
Merged to master. Probably Ok to backport if anyone feels strongly about
it, but, let's let 2.3.1 and other imminent releases go out first.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21487
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3782/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21487
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21456
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21469
@jose-torres
Ah yes I forgot that shallow copy has been occurring, so while new map
should hold necessary size of map entries but row object will be shared across
versions. Thanks for
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19602#discussion_r192576685
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveShim.scala ---
@@ -657,17 +656,29 @@ private[client] class Shim_v0_13 extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21449
My point is that, we may have a different design if we wanna solve this
problem holistically, which may conflict with this patch. We should prove that
this is in the right direction and future
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19602
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19602#discussion_r192576715
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientSuite.scala
---
@@ -59,38 +62,62 @@ class HiveClientSuite(version: String)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19602
**[Test build #91426 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/91426/testReport)**
for PR 19602 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19602
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3783/
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
