Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20146
Thanks. I rebased it.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21533
**[Test build #4219 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4219/testReport)**
for PR 21533 at commit
[`eb46ccf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user NiharS commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21807
New to SQL, but it seems like the query
`SELECT 1 LIMIT CAST('1' AS INT)`
should work, right? I tried both on Spark without to your change and the
W3Schools SQL tester and it's accep
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20146
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1104/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20146
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21447
@maropu Do you want to take this over and add such a project in
`ColumnPruning`?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsu
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21656
merged thanks @cxzl25
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: revi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20146
**[Test build #93246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93246/testReport)**
for PR 20146 at commit
[`c003bd3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c0
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21635#discussion_r203495430
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMasterSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21468
merged thanks @pgandhi999
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21742#discussion_r203496489
--- Diff:
external/avro/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/avro/package.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21468
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20146
Yeah, looks appveyer tests are triggered.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comman
Github user edwinalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r203503691
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListener.scala ---
@@ -160,11 +160,29 @@ case class
SparkListenerBlockUpdated(blockUpdatedIn
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21710
**[Test build #93245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93245/testReport)**
for PR 21710 at commit
[`ec88d38`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21795
**[Test build #93239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93239/testReport)**
for PR 21795 at commit
[`c83eeeb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21710
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93245/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21710
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21795
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21795
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93239/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user echarles commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
> Note that we only invoke any of the feature steps and the entry point of
KubernetesClientApplication if we run in cluster mode. If we run in client
mode, we enter directly into the user's main cl
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spa
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
@MaxGekk The example you cites is literally one of a handful of usages
which is not easily overridden - and is prefixed with a 'HACK ALERT' ! A few
others are in mllib, typically for reading schema.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21809
**[Test build #93247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93247/testReport)**
for PR 21809 at commit
[`7be0520`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7b
Github user echarles commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
PS: Actually, there would even be no issue with the port assignment as
Spark knows which ports he will be using, so he can create the headless service
with the correct ports for the user.
---
--
Github user gvr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21806
Updated description, thanks @hvanhovell
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user mccheah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
@echarles I don't think we should be special-casing Kubernetes here as
being any different from the other cluster managers. The main point of client
mode is that the driver is running locally and we
Github user mccheah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
Though I suppose you could have the driver patch its own metadata fields to
assign itself a unique label. I could see that being confusing to users when
they observe that their driver pod metadata i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21806
**[Test build #93240 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93240/testReport)**
for PR 21806 at commit
[`68d6f19`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21806
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93240/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21806
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user echarles commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
@mccheah If I compare with yarn-client with all nodes on the same LAN, we
introduce complexity here as the user has to ensure not only configuration, but
also deployment of a particular resource. I
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21720
LGTM
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comm
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r203520320
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListener.scala ---
@@ -160,11 +160,29 @@ case class
SparkListenerBlockUpdated(blockUpdatedInfo
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
@mridulm scheduler pools could also make the cluster-wide resource numbers
not very meaningful. I don't think the maxShare work has been merged yet (kind
of a stalled TODO on an open PR, IIRC),
Github user mccheah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
> About selecting the pod with labels, another approach I have taken is
simply using the name of the driver pod, a bit like I have done with the
following deployment (so no need to ensure labels - t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21720
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21729
**[Test build #93248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93248/testReport)**
for PR 21729 at commit
[`f9ed226`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f9
Github user liyinan926 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
> I don't think you can back a service with a selector that's a pod's name,
but someone with more knowledge of the Service API might be able to correct me
here. I was under the impression one had
Github user mccheah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
> Yes, the service gets its endpoints by matching its label selector
against labels on the pods so it's critical to have matching labels. Another
tenable solution is for the driver backend code to g
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21729
**[Test build #93249 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93249/testReport)**
for PR 21729 at commit
[`6316e5b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/63
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21806
The change looks fine. However I'm wondering that have we have chance to
compare hash code between expr ids from different jvms?
---
Github user liyinan926 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
> The problem is that the driver's labels might not be unique to that
driver, which therefore would require the user to assign their own unique
labels or for us to patch the driver pod in-place t
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
> ... unless explicitly overridden by user.
This is the problem this PR addresses, actually.
> If you need fine grained information about executors, use spark listener
(it is trivia
Github user echarles commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
Got you points. About labels, right, we could take the road of the code
that creates labels on its own pod. To ensure uniqueness, we could use the
`spark-app-id` as key (if it maps the requirement
Github user liyinan926 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
> Got you points. About labels, right, we could take the road of the code
that creates labels on its own pod. To ensure uniqueness, we could use the
spark-app-id as key (if it maps the requiremen
Github user huaxingao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21710#discussion_r203526021
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/PrefixSpanWrapper.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21720
@gatorsmile @maryannxue Can we move forward with this PR:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21699 ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
Github user bavardage commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21794
it does seem that spark currently does distinguish -0 and 0, at least as
far as groupbys go
```
scala> case class Thing(x : Float)
defined class Thing
scala> val df = Seq(
Github user echarles commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
> Label spark-app-id is only set if spark-submit goes through the steps to
create the driver pod so doesn't apply in this case.
In that case, the client process could create its own
`spark
Github user liyinan926 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
> In that case, the client process could create its own
spark-client-app-id...
Yes, and that's what my point above is about. Regardless of how the driver
pod is created and managed, user
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21533
**[Test build #4220 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4220/testReport)**
for PR 21533 at commit
[`eb46ccf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21806
@viirya this current change is only useful when you compare canonicalized
plans created on different JVMs. This has come up when we tried to detect
changes in plans over spark versions (plan stab
Github user mccheah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
I think taking a step back, it seems unwise more so to be making any
assumptions about the location in which a driver is running in client mode.
Client mode is simply just saying that the applicatio
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21794
`spark-sql` suggests that -0 and 0 are considered the same though. `SELECT
-0.0 == 0.0;` returns `true`. It's probably essential not to change behavior
here, but if performance is the issue, I think
Github user liyinan926 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
> That is why I suggested also to remove the driver's knowledge of the
driver pod name and to remove the owner reference concept entirely.
While, not worrying about the driver pod name a
Github user echarles commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21748
> I'm personally leaning towards doing that for the user.
Especially if the user is a data scientist behind his notebook launching a
paragraph which is supposed to instanciate a Spark REPL
Github user bomeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21638
Either way works for me, but I think since this is not a private method, so
people may use it in their own approach. The minimal change will be the best.
---
--
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21807
@NiharS yeah that makes sense. @mauropalsgraaf we missed this today (sorry
about that). Can you add the null check (bonus points if you call `eval()` only
once), add a test for this case?
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21638
Except for `binaryFiles`, everything else that needs to change is private
to Spark. I know it's public in the bytecode, but only Java callers could
accidentally exploit that. Still I don't personally
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21582
Thank you so much, @gatorsmile . I will proceed.
Also, thank you, @viirya and @maropu .
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: r
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21202
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1105/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21202
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
**[Test build #93250 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93250/testReport)**
for PR 21451 at commit
[`335e26d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/33
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
@mridulm @jerryshao @felixcheung last one in the 2GB block limit series.
just rebased to include the updates to
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440. I will also run my tests on a
cluster he
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21546
Thanks @HyukjinKwon! Any additional comments @holdenk @sethah @viirya
@felixcheung ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-u
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18784
Let's remove it in 3.0 then. We can do it after 2.4 release.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21808
**[Test build #93241 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93241/testReport)**
for PR 21808 at commit
[`a444e80`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21808
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93241/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21808
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
@MaxGekk We are going in circles.
I dont think this is a good api to expose currently - the data is available
through multiple other means as I detailed and while not a succinct oneliner,
it is
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21806
@hvanhovell Got it. Thanks for your explanation. LGTM.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For addi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21761
Hi, @gatorsmile .
Could you review this PR? I'm wondering if we can have this for Spark 2.4
before branch-cut.
---
-
T
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21710#discussion_r203538149
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/PrefixSpanWrapper.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
GitHub user MaxGekk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21810
[SPARK-24854][SQL] Gathering all Avro options into the AvroOptions class
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the PR, I propose to put all `Avro` options in new class `Avr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21810
**[Test build #93251 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93251/testReport)**
for PR 21810 at commit
[`3a76ba2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3a
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21798
Please, look at this PR: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21810 . It
introduces `AvroOptions`.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21810
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21810
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
> it's not terribly useful to know, e.g., that there are 5 million cores in
the cluster if your Job is running in a scheduler pool that is restricted to
using far fewer CPUs via the pool's maxShares
Github user ssimeonov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
@mridulm your comments make an implicit assumption, which is quite
incorrect: that Spark users read the Spark codebase and/or are aware of Spark
internals. Please, consider this PR in the context
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21803
**[Test build #93242 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93242/testReport)**
for PR 21803 at commit
[`f302777`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21803
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21803
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93242/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21810
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93251/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21810
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21810
**[Test build #93251 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93251/testReport)**
for PR 21810 at commit
[`3a76ba2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user liyinan926 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21796
I think we decided not to take any new configuration options with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24434 being worked on. @mccheah
@foxish.
---
-
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21795
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21584
just wanted to briefly chime in:
TL;DR: this build will fail until the PRB is running on our ubuntu build
nodes.
we are currently blocked from testing this stuff w/the current i
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
No, defaultParallelism isn't more useful in that case, but that just starts
getting to my overall assessment of this JIRA and PR: It smells of defining the
problem to align with a preconception
Github user ssimeonov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
@markhamstra the purpose of this PR is not to address the topic of dynamic
resource management in arbitrarily complex Spark environments. Most Spark users
do not operate in such environments. It i
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
@ssimeonov the purpose of a public API is not to offer hack solutions to a
subset of problems. What is needed is a high-level, declarative abstraction
that can be used to specify requested Job r
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21795
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apac
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21804
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21804
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1106/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21804
**[Test build #93252 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/93252/testReport)**
for PR 21804 at commit
[`5ffc793`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5f
Github user ssimeonov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21589
@markhamstra even the words you are using indicate that you are missing the
intended audience.
> high-level, declarative abstraction that can be used to specify requested
Job resource-usa
301 - 400 of 598 matches
Mail list logo
