Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3003#issuecomment-61396477
[Test build #22745 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22745/consoleFull)
for PR 3003 at commit
[`248ed5e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3003#issuecomment-61396480
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2530#issuecomment-61396475
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user leizongxiong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/216#issuecomment-61396457
does the branch can be published with spark 1.2.0 version @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2971#issuecomment-61396408
[Test build #22751 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22751/consoleFull)
for PR 2971 at commit
[`ff35ee6`](https://githu
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#discussion_r19710069
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -313,14 +319,30 @@ object ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61396321
[Test build #22750 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22750/consoleFull)
for PR 3053 at commit
[`ca2e6e6`](https://githu
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2971#issuecomment-61396291
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2944#issuecomment-61396221
[Test build #22744 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22744/consoleFull)
for PR 2944 at commit
[`f719266`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2944#issuecomment-61396223
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61396104
[Test build #22749 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22749/consoleFull)
for PR 3053 at commit
[`e77f936`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#issuecomment-61396080
[Test build #22742 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22742/consoleFull)
for PR 3032 at commit
[`b88c919`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#issuecomment-61396081
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#discussion_r19710036
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/TransportServer.java
---
@@ -67,8 +68,9 @@ private void init(int portToBind) {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2843#issuecomment-61396031
[Test build #22748 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22748/consoleFull)
for PR 2843 at commit
[`a873d0f`](https://githu
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2843#issuecomment-61395981
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059#issuecomment-61395832
[Test build #22743 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22743/consoleFull)
for PR 3059 at commit
[`b398cfd`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059#issuecomment-61395835
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#discussion_r19709984
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/TransportServer.java
---
@@ -67,8 +68,9 @@ private void init(int portToBind) {
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#discussion_r19709969
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/TransportServer.java
---
@@ -67,8 +68,9 @@ private void init(int portToBind) {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2530#issuecomment-61395474
[Test build #22741 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22741/consoleFull)
for PR 2530 at commit
[`24201d4`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2530#issuecomment-61395476
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2919#issuecomment-61395355
[Test build #22747 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22747/consoleFull)
for PR 2919 at commit
[`b4a2803`](https://githu
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2919#issuecomment-61395289
@marmbrus @mengxr Thanks for all the help with this PR! I merged and
updated based on comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61395256
**[Test build #22735 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22735/consoleFull)**
for PR 3053 at commit
[`ff80166`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61395258
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2933#issuecomment-61395215
[Test build #22746 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22746/consoleFull)
for PR 2933 at commit
[`aab61a8`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3003#issuecomment-61395147
[Test build #22745 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22745/consoleFull)
for PR 3003 at commit
[`248ed5e`](https://githu
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#discussion_r19709873
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/BlockStoreShuffleFetcher.scala
---
@@ -52,18 +53,18 @@ private[hash] object BlockStoreShuffleFetc
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#discussion_r19709867
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -313,14 +319,29 @@ object ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator {
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#discussion_r19709864
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/hash/BlockStoreShuffleFetcher.scala
---
@@ -52,18 +53,18 @@ private[hash] object BlockStoreShuffleFetc
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2944#issuecomment-61394867
[Test build #22744 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22744/consoleFull)
for PR 2944 at commit
[`f719266`](https://githu
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2944#issuecomment-61394856
I've pushed a new commit to fix the merge conflict here. Could someone
review this latest revision?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61394842
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61394840
[Test build #22739 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22739/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
[`5cae3f2`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059#issuecomment-61394788
[Test build #22743 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22743/consoleFull)
for PR 3059 at commit
[`b398cfd`](https://githu
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059#issuecomment-61394703
Hm, the above test failure is legitimate. However, the test failure is
sensitive to execution order, namely, it only fails when some test case had
cached the test table
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3032#issuecomment-61394707
[Test build #22742 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22742/consoleFull)
for PR 3032 at commit
[`b88c919`](https://githu
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#discussion_r19709798
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/TransportServer.java
---
@@ -67,8 +68,9 @@ private void init(int portToBind) {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#discussion_r19709795
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/TransportServer.java
---
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
private ChannelFuture channelFuture;
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2868#issuecomment-61394403
@codedeft The merge script didn't close this PR automatically. Could you
help close it? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2971#issuecomment-61394331
[Test build #22740 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22740/consoleFull)
for PR 2971 at commit
[`ff35ee6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2971#issuecomment-61394332
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3005#issuecomment-61394315
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3005#issuecomment-61394314
[Test build #22732 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22732/consoleFull)
for PR 3005 at commit
[`c83571a`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2815#issuecomment-61394273
Let's not change the old API. Just deprecate it, and then add this
tripletFields thing to the new API Ankur is going to submit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2971#issuecomment-61394191
[Test build #22740 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22740/consoleFull)
for PR 2971 at commit
[`ff35ee6`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2530#issuecomment-61394189
[Test build #22741 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22741/consoleFull)
for PR 2530 at commit
[`24201d4`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3057#issuecomment-61394162
[Test build #22733 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22733/consoleFull)
for PR 3057 at commit
[`7ccf932`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3057#issuecomment-61394164
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61394151
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61394149
[Test build #22730 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22730/consoleFull)
for PR 3053 at commit
[`73abd86`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2971#issuecomment-61394122
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2530#issuecomment-61394102
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#issuecomment-61394068
LGTM. You'd want to update the PR description before merging it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059#issuecomment-61393958
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059#issuecomment-61393956
[Test build #22736 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22736/consoleFull)
for PR 3059 at commit
[`fb3ee85`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059#issuecomment-61393900
[Test build #22734 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22734/consoleFull)
for PR 3059 at commit
[`38cf5b5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059#issuecomment-61393901
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3003#issuecomment-61393735
Looks like this has a compile error after the change
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61393558
[Test build #22739 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22739/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
[`5cae3f2`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3003#issuecomment-61393503
[Test build #22738 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22738/consoleFull)
for PR 3003 at commit
[`272522e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3003#issuecomment-61393504
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3003#issuecomment-61393459
[Test build #22738 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22738/consoleFull)
for PR 3003 at commit
[`272522e`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61393376
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61393375
[Test build #22737 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22737/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
[`ea49fe0`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#issuecomment-61393355
[Test build #22737 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22737/consoleFull)
for PR 3029 at commit
[`ea49fe0`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3058#issuecomment-61393313
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059#issuecomment-61393299
[Test build #22736 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22736/consoleFull)
for PR 3059 at commit
[`fb3ee85`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3058#issuecomment-61393310
[Test build #22727 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22727/consoleFull)
for PR 3058 at commit
[`b548017`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2843#issuecomment-61393298
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2843#issuecomment-61393296
[Test build #22728 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22728/consoleFull)
for PR 2843 at commit
[`a873d0f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#issuecomment-61393233
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#issuecomment-61393229
[Test build #22731 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22731/consoleFull)
for PR 2475 at commit
[`1ed6010`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059#issuecomment-61393214
[Test build #22734 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22734/consoleFull)
for PR 3059 at commit
[`38cf5b5`](https://githu
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3029#discussion_r19709497
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -521,6 +529,51 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
sched.dagS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61393213
[Test build #22735 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22735/consoleFull)
for PR 3053 at commit
[`ff80166`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3057#issuecomment-61393161
[Test build #22733 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22733/consoleFull)
for PR 3057 at commit
[`7ccf932`](https://githu
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3059
[SPARK-4182][SQL] Fixes ColumnStats classes for boolean, binary and complex
data types
`NoopColumnStats` was once used for binary, boolean and complex data types.
This `ColumnStats` doesn't retur
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3005#issuecomment-61392990
[Test build #22732 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22732/consoleFull)
for PR 3005 at commit
[`c83571a`](https://githu
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2811#issuecomment-61392916
Does this actually improve performance?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2986#issuecomment-61392476
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2986#issuecomment-61392474
[Test build #22724 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22724/consoleFull)
for PR 2986 at commit
[`7750e47`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61392404
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61392403
[Test build #22726 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22726/consoleFull)
for PR 3053 at commit
[`391cdb8`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2475#issuecomment-61392395
[Test build #22731 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22731/consoleFull)
for PR 2475 at commit
[`1ed6010`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3057#issuecomment-61392357
[Test build #22725 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22725/consoleFull)
for PR 3057 at commit
[`d44f4da`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3057#issuecomment-61392358
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61392231
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61392115
[Test build #22730 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22730/consoleFull)
for PR 3053 at commit
[`73abd86`](https://githu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2983
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3058#issuecomment-61391905
[Test build #22727 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22727/consoleFull)
for PR 3058 at commit
[`b548017`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2843#issuecomment-61391908
[Test build #22728 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22728/consoleFull)
for PR 2843 at commit
[`a873d0f`](https://githu
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3058
[SPARK-4193][BUILD] Disable doclint in Java 8 to prevent from build error.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ueshin/apache-spark is
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3047#issuecomment-61391820
@srowen Actually was going to fix the comments, my editor did the
whitespace stuff for me :) Considering `dev/run-tests` is a rather infrequently
touched file, this mig
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2843#issuecomment-61391725
Done rebasing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61391679
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3053#issuecomment-61391677
[Test build #22723 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22723/consoleFull)
for PR 3053 at commit
[`5717473`](https://gith
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2811#discussion_r19709256
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -120,14 +120,14 @@ class FileInputDStream[K: ClassTag,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3057#issuecomment-61391270
[Test build #22725 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22725/consoleFull)
for PR 3057 at commit
[`d44f4da`](https://githu
1 - 100 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
