Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#issuecomment-167161664
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10471
[SPARK-12522] [SQL] [MINOR] Add the missing the document strings for the
SQL configuration
Fixing the missing the document for the configuration. We can see the
missing messages "TODO" when
GitHub user xguo27 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10473
[SPARK-12521][SQL][WIP] JDBCRelation does not honor lowerBound/upperBound
JDBCRelation is not bounding the rows when lowerBound/upperBound are given.
This change honors the bounds given.
You can
Github user WangTaoTheTonic closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8048
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10388#issuecomment-167162791
**[Test build #48315 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48315/consoleFull)**
for PR 10388 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10388#issuecomment-167162799
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10388#issuecomment-167162798
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#issuecomment-167167484
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#issuecomment-167167489
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#issuecomment-167167658
Thank you very much for reviewing the patch Michael , Sean.
@Michael : I agree with you long unnecessary strings in the plan output is
annoying. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#issuecomment-167167270
**[Test build #48316 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48316/consoleFull)**
for PR 10461 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48432615
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10472#issuecomment-167166797
**[Test build #48318 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48318/consoleFull)**
for PR 10472 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10388#issuecomment-167180493
**[Test build #48319 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48319/consoleFull)**
for PR 10388 at commit
Github user taishi-oss commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8935#issuecomment-167196430
I modified some mistakes that was pointed out in #8534.
@mengxr Could you take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#discussion_r48432925
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -153,6 +153,15 @@ object SetOperationPushDown
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10471#issuecomment-167165557
**[Test build #48317 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48317/consoleFull)**
for PR 10471 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10471#issuecomment-167172286
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10471#issuecomment-167172267
**[Test build #48317 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48317/consoleFull)**
for PR 10471 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10471#issuecomment-167172285
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167203391
**[Test build #48320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48320/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167203394
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167203393
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10475#issuecomment-167204565
**[Test build #48321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48321/consoleFull)**
for PR 10475 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#issuecomment-167162372
**[Test build #48316 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48316/consoleFull)**
for PR 10461 at commit
GitHub user BenFradet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10472
[SPARK-9716] [ML] BinaryClassificationEvaluator should accept Double
prediction column
This PR aims to allow the prediction column of
`BinaryClassificationEvaluator` to be of double type.
You
Github user rnowling commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4027#issuecomment-167166741
It's really unfortunate that this patch was closed without merging. I
disagree with @andrewor14 and others that it exposes to much to the average
user. It's much
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167160783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167160782
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167160752
**[Test build #48314 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48314/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10472#issuecomment-167169467
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10472#issuecomment-167169466
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10472#issuecomment-167169451
**[Test build #48318 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48318/consoleFull)**
for PR 10472 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10330#issuecomment-167185431
@cloud-fan any other comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167202451
> I have committed the proposed change which moves setName after the map.
I've tested locally and now the name field is valid.
>
> does it make sense ?
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10475#issuecomment-167205800
**[Test build #48321 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48321/consoleFull)**
for PR 10475 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10475#issuecomment-167205989
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10475#issuecomment-167205992
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10474#issuecomment-167198456
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8048#issuecomment-167198843
No prob. will close this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167203168
**[Test build #48320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48320/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10388#issuecomment-167179672
I delete the test cases from DataFrameNaFunctionsSuite.scala. I checked the
previous failure, not sure why it is failed. I worked when I run the local test
on my
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10473#issuecomment-167190846
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user xguo27 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10473#issuecomment-167190872
Marking it [WIP] to invite discussion here. : ) As I suspect the original
code includes infinity on both smaller than side and greater than side for a
reason.
---
If
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167202389
@cloud-fan Just added a quick fix by introducing a stop flag to avoid
adding extra `Limit` in the subsequent iteration, but I am not sure if my way
is good.
GitHub user SaintBacchus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10475
[SPARK-12316] Wait a minutes to avoid cycle calling.
When application end, AM will clean the staging dir.
But if the driver trigger to update the delegation token, it will can't
find the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167205352
**[Test build #48322 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48322/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10461#discussion_r48426589
--- Diff: dev/deps/spark-deps-hadoop-2.4 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+JavaEWAH-0.3.2.jar
--- End diff --
IMO, there's very little overhead to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10388#issuecomment-167189998
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10388#issuecomment-167189967
**[Test build #48319 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48319/consoleFull)**
for PR 10388 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10388#issuecomment-167189997
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10330#discussion_r48432747
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -200,6 +204,10 @@ case class TakeOrderedAndProject(
GitHub user naveenminchu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10474
[SPARK-12436][SQL] Now InferSchema should return NullType and
ArrayType(NullType)
a.) Currently I have fix for InferSchema to return NullType and
ArrayType(NullType)
b.) @rxin Can you
Github user echoTomei closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10407
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167150757
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167150758
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167150742
**[Test build #48313 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48313/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user wyaron commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167151653
Thanks for the quick CR !
Apparently, the new unit test has just failed for sc.wholeTextFiles(...) :-)
My guess is that it was broken in commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10388#issuecomment-167152963
**[Test build #48315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48315/consoleFull)**
for PR 10388 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167153204
**[Test build #48314 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48314/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#issuecomment-167138258
The new fix contains two parts:
1) Since the full outer join will remove the duplicates, we are unable to
add the extra `limit` to both sides. As long as we
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#issuecomment-167139802
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#issuecomment-167139803
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#issuecomment-167139745
**[Test build #48311 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48311/consoleFull)**
for PR 10465 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167141253
**[Test build #48313 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48313/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#discussion_r48422742
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#discussion_r48422480
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167141665
**[Test build #48312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48312/consoleFull)**
for PR 10456 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167141687
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#issuecomment-167141686
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sarutak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10456#discussion_r48422596
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ class SparkContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10468#discussion_r48402545
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -186,13 +187,19 @@ private[sql] object JDBCRDD
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8915#issuecomment-167068117
**[Test build #48295 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48295/consoleFull)**
for PR 8915 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8915#issuecomment-167068160
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10330#issuecomment-167069840
**[Test build #48296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48296/consoleFull)**
for PR 10330 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10330#issuecomment-167069917
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10330#issuecomment-167069919
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10468#discussion_r48404669
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -186,8 +187,26 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#discussion_r48405245
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sqlContext:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#issuecomment-167077729
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10468#discussion_r48402449
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -186,13 +187,19 @@ private[sql] object JDBCRDD extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10402#issuecomment-167070921
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10402#issuecomment-167070923
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10402#issuecomment-167070865
**[Test build #48294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48294/consoleFull)**
for PR 10402 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#discussion_r48405336
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ package
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#discussion_r48405368
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/DB2Dialect.scala ---
@@ -29,4 +29,8 @@ private object DB2Dialect extends JdbcDialect {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10469#issuecomment-167077459
**[Test build #48300 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48300/consoleFull)**
for PR 10469 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10470
[SPARK-12409][SPARK-12387][SPARK-12391][SQL] Refactor filter pushdown for
JDBCRDD and add few filters
This patch refactors the filter pushdown for JDBCRDD and also adds few
filters.
Added
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10470#issuecomment-167078592
**[Test build #48302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48302/consoleFull)**
for PR 10470 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10451#issuecomment-167067050
**[Test build #48299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48299/consoleFull)**
for PR 10451 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9350#issuecomment-167069188
**[Test build #48292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48292/consoleFull)**
for PR 9350 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10427#issuecomment-167071998
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9350#issuecomment-167076426
**[Test build #2254 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2254/consoleFull)**
for PR 9350 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#discussion_r48405397
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JdbcDialects.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +108,19 @@ abstract class JdbcDialect extends Serializable {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#discussion_r48405431
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -517,4 +519,65 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#issuecomment-167077728
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#issuecomment-167077669
**[Test build #48298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48298/consoleFull)**
for PR 10454 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10454#issuecomment-167066005
**[Test build #48298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48298/consoleFull)**
for PR 10454 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10465#discussion_r48402502
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sqlContext:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#discussion_r48402964
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -171,7 +171,19 @@ object MimaExcludes {
) ++
// SPARK-11314: YARN backend moved to yarn
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
