Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r52184854
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCache.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,668 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#issuecomment-181437574
**[Test build #50922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50922/consoleFull)**
for PR 11048 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11106#issuecomment-181443249
**[Test build #50924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50924/consoleFull)**
for PR 11106 at commit
Github user tnachen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r52188015
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -260,113 +257,208 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11100#issuecomment-181443240
**[Test build #50925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50925/consoleFull)**
for PR 11100 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7#issuecomment-181462302
**[Test build #50927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50927/consoleFull)**
for PR 7 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-181248286
**[Test build #50913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50913/consoleFull)**
for PR 2 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-181248395
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-181248397
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10947#issuecomment-181250046
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10947#issuecomment-181249953
**[Test build #50912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50912/consoleFull)**
for PR 10947 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10947#issuecomment-181250049
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11100#issuecomment-181436922
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11050#issuecomment-181443489
**[Test build #50926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50926/consoleFull)**
for PR 11050 at commit
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-181426395
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#issuecomment-181437761
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11106#issuecomment-181436898
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-181440993
**[Test build #2522 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2522/consoleFull)**
for PR 6935 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-181440518
**[Test build #2522 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2522/consoleFull)**
for PR 6935 at commit
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7
[SPARK-13233][SQL][WIP] Python Dataset
draft prototype, submit PR to test it via jenkins.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-181444389
Just one comment, overall LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user tnachen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r52188465
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -825,13 +825,18 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r52184490
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCache.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,668 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11050#issuecomment-181436878
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#issuecomment-181437759
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11025#issuecomment-181265300
looks good to me as well and seems to pass pylint now @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3#discussion_r52155123
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/ActorWordCount.scala
---
@@ -63,7 +61,7 @@ class FeederActor extends Actor {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-181327618
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-181327621
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3#discussion_r52163789
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/ActorWordCount.scala
---
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ case class
Github user jayadevanmurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-181266259
Thanks @hvanhovell for this info
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user agsachin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3
[SPARK-13177][Examples]Update ActorWordCount example to not directly use
low level linked list as it is deprecated.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11003#issuecomment-181302050
I invite you to read #1717 as this has been proposed and rejected before.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user agsachin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3#discussion_r52155735
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/ActorWordCount.scala
---
@@ -18,16 +18,14 @@
// scalastyle:off println
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10780#discussion_r52160665
--- Diff: network/yarn/pom.xml ---
@@ -86,6 +94,15 @@
+
+
+
Github user agsachin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3#issuecomment-181349834
@srowen if this is ok can u ask jenkins to test..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-181271212
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10780#discussion_r52161121
--- Diff: network/yarn/pom.xml ---
@@ -96,6 +113,61 @@
+
+
+
+
Github user agsachin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11003#issuecomment-181354203
@BenFradet
That's was a long thread , after reading all still I am not able to make
conclusion what is final decision.
There is no package in spark
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#discussion_r52141782
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -289,26 +301,24 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#discussion_r52141876
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -551,12 +553,17 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
}
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#discussion_r52142152
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -551,12 +553,17 @@ class Word2VecModel private[spark] (
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-181273332
**[Test build #50917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50917/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3#discussion_r52154782
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/ActorWordCount.scala
---
@@ -39,7 +37,7 @@ case class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3#discussion_r52154706
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/ActorWordCount.scala
---
@@ -18,16 +18,14 @@
// scalastyle:off println
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#issuecomment-181327239
**[Test build #50917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50917/consoleFull)**
for PR 11105 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10780#issuecomment-181344614
**[Test build #50918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50918/consoleFull)**
for PR 10780 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-181253115
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-181257924
**[Test build #50915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50915/consoleFull)**
for PR 10152 at commit
Github user jayadevanmurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-181260259
@SparkQA
Could you please do a test again
@hvanhovell @davies
Incorporated review comments in test case. Could you please review the same
Github user markgrover commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-181264407
Thanks for your feedback, @harishreedharan I have done a significant
refactoring of code based on your feedback, sharing code where possible. The
new RDD, is now
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3#issuecomment-181299450
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-181328633
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-181328215
**[Test build #50916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50916/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#discussion_r52142120
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -289,26 +301,24 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11053#issuecomment-181258525
Thanks @yinxusen for review, I have fixed the comments, Please have a look
into this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11067#issuecomment-181267861
Yah @tedyu has a follow up PR that adds the scalastyle rule ready to rebase
once this gets merged in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user agsachin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3#discussion_r52155740
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/ActorWordCount.scala
---
@@ -63,7 +61,7 @@ class FeederActor extends Actor {
GitHub user nirmannarang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4
[SPARK-7848] [Streaming] [Update SparkStreaming docs to incorporate
iâ¦mll;'l.
â¦mportant points]
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#discussion_r52145256
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -1291,4 +1291,19 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-181265540
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jayadevanmurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-181269499
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user agsachin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3#discussion_r52157133
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/ActorWordCount.scala
---
@@ -18,16 +18,14 @@
// scalastyle:off println
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-181328631
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4#issuecomment-18199
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-181265973
@jayadevanmurali you can request a retest by making a `retest this please`
comment. The Jenkins PR builder will pick this up. See
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-181266094
**[Test build #50916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50916/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
Github user jayadevanmurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-181265819
@hvanhovell
I will make that change now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-181270729
**[Test build #50915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50915/consoleFull)**
for PR 10152 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10152#issuecomment-181271217
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-181296056
LGTM pending tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11121#issuecomment-181672547
**[Test build #50947 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50947/consoleFull)**
for PR 11121 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-181672442
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-181672445
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-181680870
**[Test build #50953 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50953/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-181680892
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-181681972
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-181681968
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-181687893
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-181687888
**[Test build #50954 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50954/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
Github user flyjy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-181688265
@srowen Thank you very much for your suggestions. The way you suggested is
clearer but the previous PR is relatively simpler. The existing codes have
passed the test
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-181687891
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-181739481
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#discussion_r52273190
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaSparkContext.scala ---
@@ -774,6 +774,16 @@ class JavaSparkContext(val sc: SparkContext)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-181679968
**[Test build #50953 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50953/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
Github user jayadevanmurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-181701118
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11055#issuecomment-181727263
LGTM, merging this into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10978#issuecomment-181742056
**[Test build #50959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50959/consoleFull)**
for PR 10978 at commit
Github user huaxingao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11104#issuecomment-181664339
Sorry for the file line length problem. Fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11109#issuecomment-181663977
cc @mengxr & @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#discussion_r52264218
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/ApplicationCache.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,669 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11128#issuecomment-181698382
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11106#discussion_r52272979
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -223,16 +222,22 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11129#issuecomment-181737645
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10951#discussion_r52258455
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1153,7 +1153,16 @@ class DAGScheduler(
}
if
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11104#issuecomment-181666127
**[Test build #50950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50950/consoleFull)**
for PR 11104 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11104#issuecomment-181666297
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#issuecomment-181687745
**[Test build #50954 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50954/consoleFull)**
for PR 11030 at commit
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5#issuecomment-181716006
@JoshRosen Thanks for taking a look. I will update it, did you also
consider renaming - or may be just updating the doc suffices ?
---
If your project is set up
GitHub user AtkinsChang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11129
[SPARK-13232][YARN] Fix executor node label
Specify node label for executor will cause Spark not working on Yarn due to
Yarn does not support node container request with both label and
1 - 100 of 407 matches
Mail list logo
