Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10980#discussion_r53594660
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVRelation.scala
---
@@ -226,11 +227,17 @@ object CSVRelation extends
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#discussion_r53594561
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/commands/parsers.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user sarathj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10621#issuecomment-187058482
@zsxwing
With 1.6 also I ran into the same exception -` java.io.IOException:
py4j.Py4JException: Cannot obtain a new communication`.
I would like to
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#discussion_r53593980
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/commands/parsers.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11270#discussion_r53593587
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ResolvedDataSource.scala
---
@@ -130,7 +131,28 @@ object ResolvedDataSource
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#discussion_r53593420
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/commands/parsers.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#discussion_r53593393
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/commands/parsers.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11300#issuecomment-187055449
**[Test build #2565 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2565/consoleFull)**
for PR 11300 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#discussion_r53593184
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/commands/parsers.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#discussion_r53592740
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockInfoManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,356 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#discussion_r53592672
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/commands/parsers.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11136#discussion_r53592447
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,547 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user Wenpei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11000#issuecomment-187047801
@yanboliang I complete this pr, please take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11300#issuecomment-187046857
Hi, @rxin .
I finished reviewing all files under the `docs` module and related stuff.
I think it's all typos for now. Thank you again.
---
If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11283#issuecomment-187045768
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11195#issuecomment-187045685
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11148#issuecomment-187045605
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11300
[MINOR][DOCS] Fix all typos in markdown files of `doc` and similar patterns
in other comments
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR tries to fix all typos in
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#issuecomment-187040244
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11270#issuecomment-187032665
I submitted some more commits. In summary,
1. Added a `DataSourceDetect` class separatly.
2. Now, it only picks a single file. If the given path is
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11270#issuecomment-187031347
I submitted some more commits. In summary,
1. Added a `DataSourceDetect` class separatly.
2. Now, it only picks a single file. If the given path is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298#issuecomment-187031165
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11270#issuecomment-187031213
I submitted some more commits. In summary,
1. Added a `DataSourceDetect` class separatly.
2. Now, it only picks a single file. If the given path is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298#issuecomment-187031164
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#discussion_r53589538
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/broadcast/TorrentBroadcast.scala ---
@@ -127,16 +127,23 @@ private[spark] class TorrentBroadcast[T:
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11299
[SPARK-13429] [MLlib] Unify Logistic Regression convergence tolerance of ML
& MLlib
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In order to provide better and consistent result,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298#issuecomment-187030953
**[Test build #51658 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51658/consoleFull)**
for PR 11298 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11270#issuecomment-187030511
I submitted some more commits. In summary,
1. Added a `DataSourceDetect` class separatly.
2. Now, it only picks a single file. If the given path is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-187028985
**[Test build #2564 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2564/consoleFull)**
for PR 11296 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-187026346
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-187026349
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10943#issuecomment-187018074
@cloud-fan Hi Wenchen, can you please advice on what is the next step for
this PR ? I am thinking that it may require more discussion to decide if we
need top keep
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11258#issuecomment-187017636
@dbtsai Thanks! I will send another PR for consistent convergence tolerance.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11297#issuecomment-187014299
@rxin @adrian-wang Can you please review the implementation and let me know
your comments.Thanks !!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#issuecomment-187011421
**[Test build #51659 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51659/consoleFull)**
for PR 11260 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#issuecomment-187011434
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#issuecomment-187011428
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#issuecomment-187010823
**[Test build #51659 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51659/consoleFull)**
for PR 11260 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298#issuecomment-187009069
cc @davies @cloud-fan . This PR is like an incremental patch with few lines
of code changes. I am not sure if the whole rewrite is worthy for resolving the
above
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11293#discussion_r53585835
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveCatalog.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298#discussion_r53585798
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -607,14 +607,21 @@ class Analyzer(
def
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298#issuecomment-187005048
# Issue 2: mixture of aliases and real columns in order by clause
```SQL
SELECT key as k, value as v, sum(value) FROM src GROUP BY key, value ORDER
BY k,
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#issuecomment-187005053
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7#issuecomment-187005041
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7#issuecomment-187005038
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7#issuecomment-187004772
**[Test build #51652 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51652/consoleFull)**
for PR 7 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-187002198
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-187002350
You need to update mima.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-187002203
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-187002073
**[Test build #51655 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51655/consoleFull)**
for PR 11296 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11267#issuecomment-187001699
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#issuecomment-187001554
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11267#issuecomment-187001694
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11267#issuecomment-187001455
**[Test build #51656 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51656/consoleFull)**
for PR 11267 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#issuecomment-187001550
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298#issuecomment-187001189
# Issue 1:
```SQL
SELECT MAX(value) FROM src GROUP BY key + 1 ORDER BY key + 1
```
`key + 1` is not an aggregated function, but we still need to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11258
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298#issuecomment-186998813
**[Test build #51658 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51658/consoleFull)**
for PR 11298 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11258#issuecomment-186998722
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#discussion_r53585015
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -260,6 +260,20 @@ case class Join(
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298#issuecomment-186996652
This PR is an incremental fix based on the previous solution for resolving
missing attributes in Sort. This is not a clean fix, I like. However, to do a
clean fix,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-186996654
**[Test build #51655 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51655/consoleFull)**
for PR 11296 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11298
[SPARK-13428] [SQL] Pushing Down Aggregate Expressions in Sort into
Aggregate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When there exists the other operators between Sort and
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11293#issuecomment-186995812
I didn't review the core parts of this PR yet, hopefully @rxin had done
that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11267#issuecomment-186995268
**[Test build #51656 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51656/consoleFull)**
for PR 11267 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11258#issuecomment-186994891
The default value in R's GLMNET is `1E-7`, and the default value in
original LBFGS implementation is `1E-8`. In order to provide better and
consistent result, let's
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-186994352
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zhonghaihua commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#issuecomment-186993839
Hi @andrewor14 , the reason of test failed seems `GitException`. Could you
retest it ? Thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-186993681
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296#issuecomment-186993684
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11267#discussion_r53583948
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -536,15 +536,27 @@ setMethod("factorial",
#'
#' Aggregate function: returns the first value in a group.
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11267#issuecomment-186993289
@shivaram Several R packages have similar function such as
[first](http://www.inside-r.org/packages/cran/pastecs/docs/first),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11229#issuecomment-186993223
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11229#issuecomment-186993224
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#issuecomment-186993136
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10794#issuecomment-186993134
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11229#issuecomment-186992965
**[Test build #51650 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51650/consoleFull)**
for PR 11229 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11297#issuecomment-186992843
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user dilipbiswal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11297
[SPARK-13427][SQL] Support USING clause in JOIN.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support queries that JOIN tables with USING clause.
SELECT * from table1 JOIN
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11296
[SPARK-13426][Core] Remove the support of SIMR
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes the support of SIMR, since SIMR is not actively used and
maintained
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11262#issuecomment-186986677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11262#issuecomment-186986680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11262#issuecomment-186986183
**[Test build #51651 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51651/consoleFull)**
for PR 11262 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11295#issuecomment-186980619
Thank you for your advice, @rxin.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11295
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11262
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11204
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11262#issuecomment-186980335
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11204#issuecomment-186980183
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#discussion_r53582665
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -260,6 +260,20 @@ case class Join(
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11295#issuecomment-186980067
Sounds good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11295#issuecomment-186979478
Oh, sure! Then, I will close this and make another PR after reviewing all
md files in docs. Is it okay for you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7#issuecomment-186976616
**[Test build #51652 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51652/consoleFull)**
for PR 7 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11235#issuecomment-186975972
cc @davies @marmbrus @liancheng @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#discussion_r53581769
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -260,6 +260,20 @@ case class Join(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#discussion_r53581679
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -260,6 +260,20 @@ case class Join(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11260#discussion_r53581595
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicOperators.scala
---
@@ -260,6 +260,20 @@ case class Join(
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11204#issuecomment-186974334
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user maropu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11269
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11262#issuecomment-186973763
**[Test build #2563 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2563/consoleFull)**
for PR 11262 at commit
1 - 100 of 429 matches
Mail list logo
