Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
**[Test build #63420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63420/consoleFull)**
for PR 13146 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
**[Test build #63419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63419/consoleFull)**
for PR 14546 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531#discussion_r74001311
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -80,13 +83,49 @@ case class CreateTableLikeCommand(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531#discussion_r74001182
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -80,13 +83,49 @@ case class CreateTableLikeCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
**[Test build #63418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63418/consoleFull)**
for PR 14546 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554#discussion_r74000577
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -41,22 +42,23 @@ object PartitionDirectory {
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554#discussion_r74000543
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/udaf.scala ---
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ private[sql] class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554#discussion_r74000537
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/udaf.scala ---
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ sealed trait BufferSetterGetterUtils {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63416/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
**[Test build #63416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63416/consoleFull)**
for PR 14555 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531#discussion_r74000488
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -80,13 +83,49 @@ case class CreateTableLikeCommand(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554#discussion_r74000462
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlanInfo.scala ---
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ class SparkPlanInfo(
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
**[Test build #63417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63417/consoleFull)**
for PR 13146 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531#discussion_r74000396
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -80,13 +83,49 @@ case class CreateTableLikeCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
**[Test build #63416 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63416/consoleFull)**
for PR 14555 at commit
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14555
[SPARK-16965][MLLIB][PYSPARK] Fix bound checking for SparseVector.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. In scala, add negative low bound checking and put all the low/upper
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14492
That's a good point. Let me close this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14492
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546#discussion_r73999422
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1252,7 +1252,9 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r73999377
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,147 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object,
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r73999041
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,147 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object,
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546#discussion_r73998920
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1252,7 +1252,9 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13775
ping @hvanhovell @rxin @liancheng @yhuai Could you review this now? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #63414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63414/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63414/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546#discussion_r73998693
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1252,7 +1252,9 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14222
ping @rxin any thoughts on this? It is waiting for a while. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #63411 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63411/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
Github user NarineK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384#discussion_r73998522
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +642,147 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63411/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554
**[Test build #63415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63415/consoleFull)**
for PR 14554 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
ping @cloud-fan @hvanhovell @liancheng Could you review this change? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531#discussion_r73998018
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -80,13 +83,49 @@ case class CreateTableLikeCommand(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531#discussion_r73997983
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -80,13 +83,49 @@ case class CreateTableLikeCommand(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546#discussion_r73997535
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1252,7 +1252,9 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087
@tdas Ping !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102
@yhuai Could you please take another look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
@rxin Ping !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63406/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13907
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14531
**[Test build #63413 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63413/consoleFull)**
for PR 14531 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13907
I see. Let me close it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146
**[Test build #63406 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63406/consoleFull)**
for PR 13146 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #63414 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63414/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63407/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
**[Test build #63407 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63407/consoleFull)**
for PR 14547 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
**[Test build #63411 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63411/consoleFull)**
for PR 14517 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
**[Test build #63412 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63412/consoleFull)**
for PR 13701 at commit
Github user GregBowyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14517
Amended commit with style changes from MLNick. Can someone call the OK to
test please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14489
LGTM. @felixcheung feel free to merge this and let me know if the commit
scripts work fine
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63409/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554
**[Test build #63409 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63409/consoleFull)**
for PR 14554 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63405/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065
**[Test build #63405 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63405/consoleFull)**
for PR 14065 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13701
**[Test build #63410 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63410/consoleFull)**
for PR 13701 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554
**[Test build #63409 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63409/consoleFull)**
for PR 14554 at commit
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554
[SPARK-16964][SQL] Remove private[sql] and private[spark] from
sql.execution package
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This package is meant to be internal, and as a result it
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
**[Test build #63408 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63408/consoleFull)**
for PR 14546 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14298#discussion_r73995159
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/PercentileApprox.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546#discussion_r73994581
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1252,7 +1252,8 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14522#discussion_r73994436
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -771,6 +771,10 @@ setGeneric("over", function(x, window) {
standardGeneric("over") })
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63404/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14550
do you know why we put comment in table properties instead of table comment
field? Some hive tricks?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14552
**[Test build #63404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63404/consoleFull)**
for PR 14552 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14550#discussion_r73994067
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14298#discussion_r73993906
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/PercentileApprox.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10846
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63402/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10846
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10846
**[Test build #63402 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63402/consoleFull)**
for PR 10846 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14520
The change here does not really affect serialization. Spark automatically
broadcasts the coefficients each time calculate is called before, and marking
it as a broadcast variable explicitly won't
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14298#discussion_r73993189
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/PercentileApprox.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886
We can create a new rule for this kind of check and put it only in sql
module, i.e. `SessionState`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886#discussion_r73992751
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +290,9 @@ private[sql] case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14549
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63391/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14549
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14549
**[Test build #63391 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63391/consoleFull)**
for PR 14549 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63401/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13907
I don't think it's a very useful feature, and we may surprise users as they
do use hive syntax to specify row format.
For advanced users, they can easily use `USING xxx` to explicitly
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
**[Test build #63401 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63401/consoleFull)**
for PR 14546 at commit
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14180
ping @Stibbons Any updates ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SaintBacchus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534
cc/ @srowen Is this OK?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886#discussion_r73991594
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +290,9 @@ private[sql] case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14298#discussion_r73991551
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/PercentileApprox.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
**[Test build #63407 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63407/consoleFull)**
for PR 14547 at commit
Github user vlad17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
@sethah Thanks for the FYI. I'm pretty confident that it'll help since now
we're directly optimizing the loss function. However, it would be nice to prove
this. Unfortunately, the example I linked
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63398/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63396/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14511
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
**[Test build #63398 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63398/consoleFull)**
for PR 14546 at commit
1 - 100 of 620 matches
Mail list logo
