Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64331/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64331 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64331/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75997361
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/SortBasedAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -131,6 +150,11 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14780
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64330/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14780
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75997312
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/SortBasedAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -131,6 +150,11 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14780
**[Test build #64330 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64330/consoleFull)**
for PR 14780 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64329/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64329 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64329/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
Hm.. I will close this for now and will ask what we want with this in the
JIRA. Thanks again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13460
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14781
**[Test build #64333 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64333/consoleFull)**
for PR 14781 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
I see. Yes, I think that makes sense. Let me convert this PR into fixing
typos as below:
```
Returns returns date with the time portion of the day truncated to the unit
specified
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14729
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14729
The PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14781 is opened. This one will
be closed. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64332 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64332/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14781
cc @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user clockfly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
ï¼ viirya, thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14781
[SPARK-17167] [2.0] [SQL] Issue Exceptions when Analyze Table on In-Memory
Cataloged Tables
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `Analyze Table` is only used for
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
Hi, @rxin .
Could you review this PR again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64328/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #64328 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64328/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75994611
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,153 @@ abstract class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75994597
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,153 @@ abstract class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75994519
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/SortBasedAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -90,6 +91,24 @@ class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
This is just my personal impression. You always had better ask advice of
committers. Spark community has been reducing the gap between DBMS and
SparkSQL. :)
---
If your project is set up
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r75994509
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,175 @@ abstract class
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
If possible, why don't you make the code more consistently instead of
function descriptions?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
Ur, @HyukjinKwon .
If you compare this with `MySQL` which returns timestamp for timestamp
input, e.g., `date_add(current_timestamp(), INTERVAL 1 DAY)`, this might look
weird. But,
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14777
Don't merge this yet; may have found more decimal bugs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64326/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
**[Test build #64326 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64326/consoleFull)**
for PR 14279 at commit
Github user jagadeesanas2 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14711
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64331 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64331/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64325/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
**[Test build #64325 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64325/consoleFull)**
for PR 14778 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14780
**[Test build #64330 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64330/consoleFull)**
for PR 14780 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14780
@hvanhovell Based on the prior discussion, I opened a JIRA and this PR. Can
you review it if it is on right direction? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64324/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14780
[SPARK-17206]SQL] Support ANALYZE TABLE on analyzable temporary view
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently `ANALYZE TABLE` DDL command can't work on temporary view.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
**[Test build #64324 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64324/consoleFull)**
for PR 10896 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64329 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64329/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14779
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14779
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64327/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14779
**[Test build #64327 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64327/consoleFull)**
for PR 14779 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14769
**[Test build #3231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3231/consoleFull)**
for PR 14769 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
Based on what you replied to @cloud-fan 's question, my follow-up question
is:
How about the non-partitioned empty ORC table?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537#discussion_r75988035
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -372,6 +372,29 @@ class OrcQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537#discussion_r75987946
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -372,6 +372,29 @@ class OrcQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537#discussion_r75987870
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -372,6 +372,29 @@ class OrcQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537#discussion_r75987730
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -372,6 +372,29 @@ class OrcQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14777
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64320/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14777
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14777
**[Test build #64320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64320/consoleFull)**
for PR 14777 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14757#discussion_r75986531
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -21,26 +21,26 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880
**[Test build #64328 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64328/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14779
**[Test build #64327 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64327/consoleFull)**
for PR 14779 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64321/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
**[Test build #64321 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64321/consoleFull)**
for PR 14702 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user junyangq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14779
[SparkR][Minor] Add more examples to window function docs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds more examples to window function docs to make them more
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14279
**[Test build #64326 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64326/consoleFull)**
for PR 14279 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64323/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
**[Test build #64323 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64323/consoleFull)**
for PR 14747 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
@dongjoon-hyun Thank you for your quick response. I will wait :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
Oh, sorry. I'm outside for dinner~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hqzizania commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14640
This work may be similar with
[SPARK-8971](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14321) which is another
variation of KFold, and very significant in some cases. I suppose it is okay
to add to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14726
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14773
Maybe these options should just case insensitive in general?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
**[Test build #64325 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64325/consoleFull)**
for PR 14778 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14726
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
Hi @dongjoon-hyun, do you mind if I ask a quick look first before cc other
committers? (as I saw a related PR was merged).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14778
[SPARK-17174][SQL] Correct usages and documenations for functions returning
date types which truncates time part
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
**[Test build #64324 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64324/consoleFull)**
for PR 10896 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14769
**[Test build #3231 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3231/consoleFull)**
for PR 14769 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64317/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64317 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64317/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14747
**[Test build #64323 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64323/consoleFull)**
for PR 14747 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64316/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64316 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64316/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
**[Test build #64322 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64322/consoleFull)**
for PR 10896 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64322/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
**[Test build #64322 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64322/consoleFull)**
for PR 10896 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896
okay, done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user junyangq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14776#discussion_r75980038
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -212,9 +212,9 @@ setMethod("showDF",
#' show
#'
-#' Print the SparkDataFrame column names and types
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75979792
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggUtils.scala
---
@@ -19,34 +19,94 @@ package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
**[Test build #64321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64321/consoleFull)**
for PR 14702 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#discussion_r75979651
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/AggUtils.scala
---
@@ -19,34 +19,94 @@ package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14776
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64319/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 525 matches
Mail list logo
