Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15554
Merged in.
Can you close this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15558
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15558
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67234/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15558
**[Test build #67234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67234/consoleFull)**
for PR 15558 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15560
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15560
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67238/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15560
**[Test build #67238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67238/consoleFull)**
for PR 15560 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67236/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
**[Test build #67236 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67236/consoleFull)**
for PR 15559 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
cc @tejasapatil fyi on the change
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15561
**[Test build #67240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67240/consoleFull)**
for PR 15561 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67233/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15561
[SPARK-18012][SQL] Simplify WriterContainer follow-up
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch is a follow-up to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551 and
did a few
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67233/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #67239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67239/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15560
**[Test build #67238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67238/consoleFull)**
for PR 15560 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15560
[SPARKR] fix warnings
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix for a bunch of test warnings that were added recently.
We need to investigate why warnings are not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
**[Test build #67237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67237/consoleFull)**
for PR 15423 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
**[Test build #67236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67236/consoleFull)**
for PR 15559 at commit
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
[SPARK-18013][SPARKR] add crossJoin API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add crossJoin and do not default to cross join if joinExpr is left out
## How was
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
**[Test build #67235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67235/consoleFull)**
for PR 15544 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377#discussion_r84212380
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2432,6 +2432,26 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67228/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
**[Test build #67228 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67228/consoleFull)**
for PR 15550 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67229/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
**[Test build #67229 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67229/consoleFull)**
for PR 15523 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15552#discussion_r84210373
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/MultilayerPerceptronClassifierWrapper.scala
---
@@ -73,6 +75,8 @@ private[r] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67232/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67232 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67232/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67230/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67230 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67230/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67227/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15558
**[Test build #67234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67234/consoleFull)**
for PR 15558 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
**[Test build #67227 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67227/consoleFull)**
for PR 15551 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15558
[SPARK-17357][SPARK-6624][SQL] Convert filter predicate to CNF in Optimizer
for pushdown
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is proposed to solve the problem #14912
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
@falaki I mean for the case the exception is raised, but it sounds it is
the same test just on different R version
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67233/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67225/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #67225 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67225/consoleFull)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546#discussion_r84205834
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/SQLBuilder.scala ---
@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ class SQLBuilder private (
case g:
Github user VinceShieh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Thanks for your valuable suggestions. @jkbradley @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user VinceShieh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84205467
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -1157,9 +1157,11 @@ class QuantileDiscretizer(JavaEstimator,
HasInputCol, HasOutputCol, JavaMLReadab
Github user VinceShieh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84205458
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -66,11 +67,13 @@ private[feature] trait
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67232 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67232/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
Github user VinceShieh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84205414
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1104,9 +1104,11 @@ for more details on the API.
`QuantileDiscretizer` takes a column with continuous features
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67231/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67231/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67226/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67231 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67231/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
**[Test build #67226 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67226/consoleFull)**
for PR 15551 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r84204673
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -354,21 +354,41 @@ object KMeans extends DefaultParamsReadable[KMeans]
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546#discussion_r84204517
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/SQLBuilder.scala ---
@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ class SQLBuilder private (
case g: Generate
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423#discussion_r84204534
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1713,4 +1713,21 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
Thanks - merging in master/branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15493
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Cool - LGTM! (I will merge once Jenkins comes back positive)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15493
I will take that and add my note.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539#discussion_r84203885
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveTablePerfStatsSuite.scala
---
@@ -103,11 +92,103 @@ class HiveDataFrameSuite extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539#discussion_r84203441
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -231,11 +231,16 @@ private[hive] class
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r84203200
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -354,21 +354,41 @@ object KMeans extends
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
@tejasapatil check other reference to scala's `zipWithIndex` and fix
similar case in `RDD.zipWithUniqueId`, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
**[Test build #67228 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67228/consoleFull)**
for PR 15550 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67230 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67230/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
**[Test build #67229 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67229/consoleFull)**
for PR 15523 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
The parm name of the verification function is wrong. It should be
`expectedNonNullableColumns`. Please check the test case again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539#discussion_r84202841
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/ListingFileCatalog.scala
---
@@ -64,11 +66,18 @@ class ListingFileCatalog(
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
cc @zhengruifeng @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14847
@ioana-delaney Thanks for review!
I replied few points first. I will add the tests you mentioned later.
4. This feature is motivated from the bucketed (and sorted, of course)
table
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67224/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15541
**[Test build #67224 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67224/consoleFull)**
for PR 15541 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
@gatorsmile A predicate like `IsNotNull(a + b + Rand())` will let this
change to wrongly set the nullability of `a` and `b` to true. Isn't it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15545
@zsxwing , would you mind taking a look at this PR? Thanks a lot.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
**[Test build #67227 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67227/consoleFull)**
for PR 15551 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15552#discussion_r84199689
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/MultilayerPerceptronClassifierWrapper.scala
---
@@ -73,6 +75,8 @@ private[r] object
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
@cloud-fan Hi wenchen, i have added the test cases for temp view. Could we
please look at this again? Thanks !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67222/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
**[Test build #67222 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67222/consoleFull)**
for PR 15539 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15552#discussion_r84198787
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -706,10 +707,13 @@ setMethod("spark.mlp", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame"),
if (!is.null(seed)) {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67221/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #67221 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67221/consoleFull)**
for PR 15009 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
**[Test build #67226 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67226/consoleFull)**
for PR 15551 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67223/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 571 matches
Mail list logo
