Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89267570
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/StatisticsCollectionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69053/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986
I managed to come up with a standalone end-to-end reproduction of the
shuffle file leak, allowing me to validate this patch's fix.
Run
```
./bin/spark-shell
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986
**[Test build #69053 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69053/consoleFull)**
for PR 15986 at commit
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15977#discussion_r89266916
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -114,10 +114,14 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69051/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959
**[Test build #69051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69051/consoleFull)**
for PR 15959 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89265835
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -310,6 +270,110 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15988
**[Test build #69056 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69056/consoleFull)**
for PR 15988 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959
**[Test build #69057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69057/consoleFull)**
for PR 15959 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15988
cc @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15988
[SPARK-18519][SQL][BRANCH-2.0] map type can not be used in EqualTo
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Technically map type is not orderable, but can be used in equality
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89264465
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -310,6 +270,110 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15951#discussion_r89263076
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -84,30 +88,106 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15951#discussion_r89242805
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -84,30 +88,106 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15951#discussion_r89249380
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -84,30 +88,106 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15951#discussion_r89252556
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -84,30 +88,106 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15951#discussion_r89262935
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15951#discussion_r89249078
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -84,30 +88,106 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15951#discussion_r89248592
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -84,30 +88,106 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986
cc @tejasapatil
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15694
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15694
Merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
Why does it cast it to double? The fix looks pretty weird.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15985
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69048/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15985
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15985
**[Test build #69048 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69048/consoleFull)**
for PR 15985 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959
**[Test build #69055 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69055/consoleFull)**
for PR 15959 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69047/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877
**[Test build #69047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69047/consoleFull)**
for PR 15877 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15956
Yea, I'll backport
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69045/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983
**[Test build #69045 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69045/consoleFull)**
for PR 15983 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959
**[Test build #69054 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69054/consoleFull)**
for PR 15959 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69049/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959
LGTM except one minor comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877
**[Test build #69049 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69049/consoleFull)**
for PR 15877 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89258891
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,176 @@ case class Statistics(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69044/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15480
**[Test build #69044 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69044/consoleFull)**
for PR 15480 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69050/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
**[Test build #69050 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69050/consoleFull)**
for PR 15987 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986
**[Test build #69053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69053/consoleFull)**
for PR 15986 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959
**[Test build #69052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69052/consoleFull)**
for PR 15959 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89258401
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,170 @@ case class Statistics(
}
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89258367
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,170 @@ case class Statistics(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89258326
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,170 @@ case class Statistics(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959
**[Test build #69051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69051/consoleFull)**
for PR 15959 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89258177
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,170 @@ case class Statistics(
}
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89258106
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,170 @@ case class Statistics(
}
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89258088
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/StatisticsSuite.scala ---
@@ -319,7 +319,8 @@ class StatisticsSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89258070
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,170 @@ case class Statistics(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89257869
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,170 @@ case class Statistics(
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986#discussion_r89257822
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -339,7 +341,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89257721
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,170 @@ case class Statistics(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15959#discussion_r89257647
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/Statistics.scala
---
@@ -58,60 +61,170 @@ case class Statistics(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69046/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986
**[Test build #69046 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69046/consoleFull)**
for PR 15986 at commit
Github user ChorPangChan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15974
I stay adding a new package to streaming is a better structure then modify
the spark-core.
can we make the decision for which implementation to use first
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15985
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15985
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69043/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976#discussion_r89257213
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/ObjectAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -262,7 +262,9 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15985
**[Test build #69043 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69043/consoleFull)**
for PR 15985 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15974
I think the base solutions are same, expect some other information which I
am working to add.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986#discussion_r89256962
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -274,4 +274,30 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15974
I think there is no need to open another reduplicate PR. Do your mind
closing this PR, and let work on #15904 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986#discussion_r89256608
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -339,7 +341,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15904
@ajbozarth Thank you for reminding me, i will take a look at it later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986#discussion_r89256275
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -89,9 +89,11 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
val
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983#discussion_r89256222
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -373,8 +373,19 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986#discussion_r89256137
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -339,7 +341,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986#discussion_r89255724
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -339,7 +341,7 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user ChorPangChan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15974
It require manual merge if I do it against master.
should I just PR with conflicts or rebase to master before PR?
btw those conflicts are just versions from the pom file.
---
If your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
Hi, @hvanhovell .
Could you review this PR?
This is the first attempt to use `UnresolvedAttribute` and Analyzer rule.
There are two debatable issues.
- Catalyst Analyzer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
**[Test build #69050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69050/consoleFull)**
for PR 15987 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
[SPARK-18515][SQL] AlterTableDropPartitions fails for non-string columns
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
While
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69040/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
**[Test build #69040 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69040/consoleFull)**
for PR 15982 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15971
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15971
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69042/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15971
**[Test build #69042 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69042/consoleFull)**
for PR 15971 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15974
This will never be merged into 1.6, so you'll have to send a new PR against
master. Please close this one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15984
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15984
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69041/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986#discussion_r89253541
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -525,7 +525,12 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15984
**[Test build #69041 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69041/consoleFull)**
for PR 15984 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877
**[Test build #69049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69049/consoleFull)**
for PR 15877 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877
cc @rxin @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15985
**[Test build #69048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69048/consoleFull)**
for PR 15985 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15986#discussion_r89252852
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -525,7 +525,12 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
1 - 100 of 638 matches
Mail list logo
