Github user matrixlibing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4066
SPARK-4879 also happened when use saveAsNewAPIHadoopFile.
Why does not support the saveAsNewAPIHadoopFile function?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
Maybe it could be cleared up a bit with a good docstring? Although if the
result is too confusing to be used then it's probably not worth doing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15211#discussion_r94723792
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVC.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,554 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70904/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
**[Test build #70904 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70904/testReport)**
for PR 16296 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70902/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
**[Test build #70902 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70902/testReport)**
for PR 12135 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70910/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
**[Test build #70910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70910/testReport)**
for PR 16432 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70903/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474
**[Test build #70903 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70903/testReport)**
for PR 16474 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70905/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
**[Test build #70905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70905/testReport)**
for PR 16296 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464#discussion_r94721880
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/LDAWrapper.scala ---
@@ -172,6 +187,8 @@ private[r] object LDAWrapper extends
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16417#discussion_r94721694
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateUnsafeProjection.scala
---
@@ -92,46 +89,53 @@ object
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Weird... Not sure why the build failed. The build works in my local
environment. cc @srowen @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16417#discussion_r94721395
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -327,24 +359,28 @@ class CodegenContext {
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16347
Maybe we should make DataFrameWriter.sortBy work here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16432
**[Test build #70910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70910/testReport)**
for PR 16432 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70908/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
**[Test build #70908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70908/consoleFull)**
for PR 15819 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16417
**[Test build #70909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70909/testReport)**
for PR 16417 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16417#discussion_r94719867
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeRow.java
---
@@ -303,6 +331,15 @@ public void setDecimal(int ordinal,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16417
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16417
Jenkins looks unstable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
**[Test build #70908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70908/consoleFull)**
for PR 15819 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819#discussion_r94719375
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -216,5 +219,37 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70907/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
**[Test build #70907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70907/consoleFull)**
for PR 15819 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819#discussion_r94719123
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -54,6 +63,63 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819#discussion_r94719028
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -216,5 +219,37 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16470
**[Test build #70906 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70906/testReport)**
for PR 16470 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
**[Test build #70907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70907/consoleFull)**
for PR 15819 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15819
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16470
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337
I compared the results and confirmed the results are consistent. LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94718428
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70899/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16460
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16460
thanks for the view, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
**[Test build #70899 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70899/testReport)**
for PR 16451 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r94718082
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,357 @@
+-- Automatically generated
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94717710
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user junegunn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16347
@chpritchard-expedia The patch here fixes the problem. I don't think it's
possible to workaround the issue by using Spark API in some different ways,
because we can't completely avoid memory
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13252
Let me suggest a generalized way latter because it does not look a clean
fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13252
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94717542
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94717473
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16470
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16470
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70900/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16470
**[Test build #70900 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70900/testReport)**
for PR 16470 at commit
Github user chengat1314 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14284
@hvanhovell Nice, thank you very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14725
Thanks @holdenk for taking a look! Yeah, I think you're right about the
issues trying to infer a type. It would be nice if there was some easy way to
specify a primitive type since that would
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94717245
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16435
closing this as it's very hard to estimate the size and does not provide
much benefit for end users.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16460
looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94717055
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70901/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
**[Test build #70901 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70901/testReport)**
for PR 15671 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464#discussion_r94716683
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/LDAWrapper.scala ---
@@ -172,6 +187,8 @@ private[r] object LDAWrapper extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16460#discussion_r94716609
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.scala
---
@@ -74,12 +69,30 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16460
cc @ericl anymore comments on this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94716584
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/AssociationRules.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user david-weiluo-ren commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16468
@tdas
It says âHowever, note that all of the operations applicable on static
DataFrames/Datasets are not supported in streaming DataFrames/Datasets yetâ
in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
**[Test build #70905 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70905/testReport)**
for PR 16296 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16422
Column-level security can block users to access the specific columns, but
this command `DESC EXTENDED/FORMATTED COLUMN` might not be part of the
design/solution.
---
If your project is set up
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94716372
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/AssociationRules.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94716281
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/AssociationRules.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296
**[Test build #70904 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70904/testReport)**
for PR 16296 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94716047
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/AssociationRules.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16472
Thanks! Merged to Spark 2.0.
Could you please close it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94715820
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/AssociationRules.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
I just checked each except for the one below is passed in Windows via
concatenated
[full-log](https://gist.github.com/HyukjinKwon/2d199ac9156c380015ad5a71f77866be).
It seems
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15415#discussion_r94715503
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/AssociationRules.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70896/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70896 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70896/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16401#discussion_r94714976
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -95,6 +96,29 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan extends
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
@jkbradley Updated. Thanks for reviewing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474
**[Test build #70903 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70903/testReport)**
for PR 16474 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16474
[SPARK-19082][SQL] Make ignoreCorruptFiles work for Parquet
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We have a config `spark.sql.files.ignoreCorruptFiles` which can be used to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
**[Test build #70902 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70902/testReport)**
for PR 12135 at commit
Github user azmras commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16429
@cxww107
Try to update both patched files in the following locations
/usr/local/Cellar/apache-spark/2.1.0/libexec/python/pyspark
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
**[Test build #70901 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70901/testReport)**
for PR 15671 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671
@jkbradley Update according to your comments, including adding
`quantileProbabilities` and `docConcentration`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15671#discussion_r94712844
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -905,7 +911,10 @@ class LDA @Since("1.6.0") (
case m:
Github user chpritchard-expedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16347
@junegunn I ran into the same issue, using partitionBy; missed it
completely during my testing. Would you share the workaround you used? I wasn't
able to understand it from your Apache
Github user lirui-intel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12775
I think the failure is due to one more [skipped
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 453 matches
Mail list logo
