Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
`SparkContext` is not associated with `SparkSession` because `SparkSession`
is a SQL-only class. So I think it is not good to import sql's `SparkSession`
to `SparkContext` and to modify its value.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16558
**[Test build #71249 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71249/testReport)**
for PR 16558 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454
how about we set `_instantiatedSession` to None in `SparkContext.stop`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user ash211 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16558
Fix missing close-parens for In filter's toString
Otherwise the open parentheses isn't closed in query plan descriptions of
batch scans.
PushedFilters: [In(COL_A,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16547
**[Test build #71248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71248/testReport)**
for PR 16547 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549#discussion_r95738880
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -383,14 +383,19 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
Since Hive and postgres have same behavior on this, I'd like to follow them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95738554
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/view.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512#discussion_r95738253
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ test_that("create DataFrame from RDD", {
expect_equal(dtypes(df),
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95735905
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/view.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95732892
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +344,96 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r95732717
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -245,6 +245,16 @@ class
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95732577
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +344,96 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16539
I think the mllib in the python side is also in maintenance mode, and we
should only fix bugs for it. @yanboliang am I right?
For this pr, I think it's reasonable to wait for the porting of
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95731778
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/view.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r95731120
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -517,6 +518,32 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r95731056
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -517,6 +518,32 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71247/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
**[Test build #71247 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71247/testReport)**
for PR 16557 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
**[Test build #71247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71247/testReport)**
for PR 16557 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71244/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user imatiach-msft opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
[SPARK-18693][ML][MLLIB][WIP] ML Evaluators should use weight column
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The evaluators BinaryClassificationEvaluator,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
**[Test build #71244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71244/testReport)**
for PR 16404 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71246/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
**[Test build #71246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71246/testReport)**
for PR 16549 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
**[Test build #71246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71246/testReport)**
for PR 16549 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454#discussion_r95729251
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -214,8 +214,12 @@ def __init__(self, sparkContext, jsparkSession=None):
self._wrapped =
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
It sounds like different RDBMS have different behaviors. Have we decided
which way we should follow?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16503
ping @zsxwing @vanzin
Could you give another look at this please ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
Be careful: the Chinese input `'â1'` is different from the English input
`'-1'`. It is hard to distinguish.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
Could you add the following test cases?
```SQL
SELECT CAST('' AS int);
-> NULL
SELECT CAST('' AS long);
-> NULL
SELECT CAST(NULL AS int);
-> NULL
SELECT
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71241/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
**[Test build #71241 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71241/testReport)**
for PR 16550 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Thank you @gatorsmile!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r95726607
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15837
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15837
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71240/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16346
cc @ajbozarth as you were interested in this earlier
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16346#discussion_r95724900
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -88,6 +88,86 @@ class BlacklistTrackerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16346#discussion_r95724311
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/exec/ExecutorsTab.scala
---
@@ -157,4 +158,42 @@ class ExecutorsListener(storageStatusListener:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15837
**[Test build #71240 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71240/testReport)**
for PR 15837 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16346#discussion_r95725456
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -88,6 +88,86 @@ class BlacklistTrackerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549#discussion_r95725235
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -383,14 +383,19 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71245/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549#discussion_r95725199
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreRelation.scala ---
@@ -49,8 +49,7 @@ private[hive] case class MetastoreRelation(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
**[Test build #71245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71245/testReport)**
for PR 12064 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454#discussion_r95725013
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -214,8 +214,12 @@ def __init__(self, sparkContext, jsparkSession=None):
self._wrapped =
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16481#discussion_r95724792
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSource.scala
---
@@ -413,17 +413,22 @@ case class DataSource(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454#discussion_r95724518
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ def getOrCreate(self):
with self._lock:
from
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454#discussion_r95724228
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ def getOrCreate(self):
with self._lock:
from
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16454#discussion_r95724161
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ def getOrCreate(self):
with self._lock:
from
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95723547
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/view.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71242/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user witgo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r95723533
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -52,7 +55,36 @@ private[spark] class TaskDescription(
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
**[Test build #71242 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71242/testReport)**
for PR 15730 at commit
Github user felixcheung closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16543
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16543
master to branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71239/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16552
**[Test build #71239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71239/testReport)**
for PR 16552 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16554
These are tests broken when you swap out the file commit protocol for our
internal implementation.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 7:41 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
>
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
**[Test build #71243 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71243/testReport)**
for PR 12064 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71243/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95721703
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +344,96 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
**[Test build #71245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71245/testReport)**
for PR 12064 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16554
@ericl why did we pass all tests before?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95720884
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +344,96 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
**[Test build #71244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71244/testReport)**
for PR 16404 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r95720653
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+/*
+
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
how about we fix this in follow-up PR? Looks like the fix is not trivial.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71237/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14451
**[Test build #71237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71237/testReport)**
for PR 14451 at commit
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16554
The test was not properly ignoring hidden files, e.g. _SUCCESS markers.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017, 7:09 PM UCB AMPLab wrote:
> Merged build finished. Test
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r95720309
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/Range.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95720330
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ColumnExpressionSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,11 +17,13 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95720313
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ColumnExpressionSuite.scala ---
@@ -17,11 +17,13 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16404
postgres handles `rand` in aggregate specially
```
cloud=# select random(), random();
random | random
---+---
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95719439
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +344,96 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12064
**[Test build #71243 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71243/testReport)**
for PR 12064 at commit
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r95719350
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+/*
+
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95719293
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +344,96 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r95719141
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+/*
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
**[Test build #71242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71242/testReport)**
for PR 15730 at commit
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r95718997
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+/*
+
Github user ron8hu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395#discussion_r95718952
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/statsEstimation/FilterEstimation.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+/*
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16554
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71234/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16554
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16554
**[Test build #71234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71234/testReport)**
for PR 16554 at commit
1 - 100 of 484 matches
Mail list logo