Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765#discussion_r99066963
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/literals.scala
---
@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ object Literal {
case
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
**[Test build #72276 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72276/testReport)**
for PR 16775 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16766
Could you please also add a few test cases?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16766#discussion_r99065789
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -823,6 +825,17 @@ case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#discussion_r99065474
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -75,13 +76,43 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#discussion_r99065162
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -75,13 +76,43 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#discussion_r99064944
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -75,13 +76,43 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16766#discussion_r99064595
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -823,6 +825,17 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664
I just quickly went over the code. It looks ok to me, but I will review it
again when the comments are resolved. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99064088
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -428,8 +481,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99063701
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -660,12 +660,21 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99063668
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -660,12 +660,21 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99063259
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyedState.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72274/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
**[Test build #72275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72275/testReport)**
for PR 16775 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
**[Test build #72274 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72274/testReport)**
for PR 16775 at commit
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99062793
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/MapGroupsWithStateSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99062729
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -428,8 +481,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99062659
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -261,13 +304,19 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99062495
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +246,17 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99062438
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/MapGroupsWithStateSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#discussion_r99062470
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -75,13 +76,43 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99062185
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -514,6 +576,9 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99062037
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -660,12 +660,21 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99061828
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -190,6 +192,32 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99061710
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -190,6 +192,32 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664
@marmbrus `DataStreamWriter` has similar issues, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99060951
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -190,6 +192,32 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r99060523
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -660,12 +660,21 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
@zhengruifeng Please try to improve the test case coverage in the follow-up
PRs. You might find some bugs when you added these test cases. Thanks for your
work!
---
If your project is set up
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#discussion_r99060083
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -75,13 +76,43 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#discussion_r99059985
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -75,13 +76,43 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#discussion_r99059884
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -75,13 +76,43 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99059679
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/KeyedStateImpl.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
@zhengruifeng Actually, I still have a few comments about this PR. I will
leave the comments soon. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#discussion_r99059030
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -75,13 +76,43 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
@HyukjinKwon @gatorsmile Thanks for pointing out those issues. I will
create a followup PR to fix them ASAP.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
@holdenk When you do the code merge, you need to leave a comment to explain
which branch you merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#discussion_r99057948
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -75,13 +76,43 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user thomastechs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16743
One point, as discussed, statusChange gets called for task status change.
So, if we can identify the point where the job or that executor(Only one
executor for local mode, right) is failed, we
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16761
hmm, I wasn't sure to have the parameter changes in 2.1, what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99056238
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ import scala.util.Try
import
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
hmm, that's not a super big issue since vector and list is more or less the
same in R.
I think it might be better if we are treating the type consistently,
although it might be a concerning
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99056047
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -72,6 +72,21 @@ private[ml] trait DecisionTreeParams extends
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99055889
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -590,8 +599,8 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16767#discussion_r99055560
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -819,6 +821,18 @@ perplexity <- spark.perplexity(model, corpusDF)
perplexity
```
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16773
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16767#discussion_r99055524
--- Diff: R/pkg/vignettes/sparkr-vignettes.Rmd ---
@@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ SparkR supports the following machine learning models
and algorithms.
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
ah thanks. so I were to
```
library(statmod)
library(SparkR)
```
could I still access the statmod tweedie function?
ie. does statmod::tweedie still work with R
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99055341
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/DecisionTreeMetadata.scala
---
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16773
Thanks. Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16739
yap, https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16739#issuecomment-276739220 -
only RDD has `coalesce(.. shuffle)`, in Dataset, it's `coalesce` and
`repartition`
---
If your project is set up for
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99054611
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressor.scala
---
@@ -117,20 +114,20 @@ class RandomForestRegressor
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99054576
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/DecisionTreeRegressor.scala
---
@@ -99,16 +105,31 @@ class DecisionTreeRegressor
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99054369
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/RandomForestClassifier.scala
---
@@ -126,20 +127,20 @@ class RandomForestClassifier
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72273/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99054331
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LabeledPoint.scala ---
@@ -35,4 +35,11 @@ case class LabeledPoint(@Since("2.0.0") label:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72273 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72273/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99054115
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/DecisionTreeClassifier.scala
---
@@ -106,14 +122,18 @@ class DecisionTreeClassifier
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
also cc @MLnick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16722#discussion_r99053832
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/TestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ object TestingUtils {
/**
*
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
cc @mengxr @jkbradley @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
**[Test build #72274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72274/testReport)**
for PR 16775 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16775
[WIP][ML] Periodic checkout datasets for long ml pipeline
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
WIP
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Github user drcrallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16714
@vanzin can you check this out please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72273/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72272/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
**[Test build #72272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72272/testReport)**
for PR 16765 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16690
Thanks a lot for reviewing this PR~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16773
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16773
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72266/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16773
**[Test build #72266 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72266/testReport)**
for PR 16773 at commit
Github user titicaca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
I tried to modify the PRIMITIVE_TYPES for timestamp, but it had a side
effect on coltypes method.
In test_sparkSQL.R#2262, `expect_equal(coltypes(DF), c("integer",
"logical",
Github user adamstatdna commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16743
My use case is end-to-end automated testing in local mode using
programmatic Launcher. I have tests where the Spark app is expected to be
FINISHED and those where it is expected to be FAILED.
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16763
@hhbyyh Thanks a lot for pointing this out!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135#discussion_r99040876
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -75,13 +76,43 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16772
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72271/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16772
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16772
**[Test build #72271 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72271/testReport)**
for PR 16772 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12420
I missed the ClassTag question above. Let me take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72268/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72268/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
**[Test build #72272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72272/testReport)**
for PR 16765 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16765
Simplified the code change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16723
(I just rebased it based on this PR and built the javadoc8 for sure. I
believe it should emit an error if this PR introduce the break but it seems
not. So, LGTM for doc changes.)
---
If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
Please hold on this PR. Found a serious bug to fix in case insensitive
option support.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72267/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774
**[Test build #72267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72267/testReport)**
for PR 16774 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16772
**[Test build #72271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72271/testReport)**
for PR 16772 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16771
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72269/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16771
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16771
**[Test build #72269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72269/testReport)**
for PR 16771 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16772
**[Test build #72270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72270/testReport)**
for PR 16772 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16772
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72270/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16772
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 355 matches
Mail list logo
