Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16739
**[Test build #72925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72925/testReport)**
for PR 16739 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r101218456
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2729,6 +2749,18 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
}
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125
@mallman Looks good to me. Wait for any committers to check this further.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16761
ping @wangmiao1981 please close this PR - backport PR merged to non-master
branch isn't closed automatically.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15125#discussion_r101216945
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/Pregel.scala ---
@@ -155,6 +169,8 @@ object Pregel extends Logging {
i += 1
}
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15918#discussion_r101216681
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -708,6 +715,13 @@ object ScalaReflection extends
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
@sethah Really appreciate your detailed code review and comments. :)
@MLnick @yanboliang Thank you for the help as well. Please let me know if
you guys have any other comments.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15918
**[Test build #72924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72924/testReport)**
for PR 15918 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72923/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15918
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15918
**[Test build #72922 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72922/testReport)**
for PR 15918 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15918
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72921/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15918
**[Test build #72921 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72921/testReport)**
for PR 15918 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r101214678
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r101214398
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,360 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821#discussion_r101214262
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ArrowConverters.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,360 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15918
**[Test build #72921 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72921/testReport)**
for PR 15918 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
@hvanhovell : Re performance:
I ran a SMB join query over two real world tables (2 trillion rows (40 TB)
and 6 million rows (120 GB)). Note that this dataset does not have skew so no
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16935
Let's not merge it right now. I may need to log more.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16931#discussion_r101207253
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -270,52 +269,17 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16931#discussion_r101206619
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -270,52 +269,17 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72918/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
**[Test build #72918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72918/testReport)**
for PR 16909 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72917/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #72917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72917/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896
Just one minor comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16896#discussion_r101204910
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ def toInternal(self, dt):
if dt is not None:
seconds =
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
Aha, looks good to me. Just a sec, and I'll modify the code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928
@maropu, I just ran some similar tests with JSON datasource. What do you
think about matching it to JSON's behaviour by introducing
`columnNameOfCorruptRecord`?
I ran with the data and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72913/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72913/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72912/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72914/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72912/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16935
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72919/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
**[Test build #72914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72914/testReport)**
for PR 16674 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16935
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16935
**[Test build #72919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72919/testReport)**
for PR 16935 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
@gatorsmile I have fixed some review issues. Could you help to continue to
review this ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16932
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16932
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72906/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16932
**[Test build #72906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72906/testReport)**
for PR 16932 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r101201608
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaMinHashLSHExample.java
---
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16935
**[Test build #72919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72919/testReport)**
for PR 16935 at commit
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16935
[SPARK-19604] [TESTS] Log the start of every Python test
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Right now, we only have info level log after we finish the tests of a
Python
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72915/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
**[Test build #72915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72915/testReport)**
for PR 16907 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r101201086
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72911/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
**[Test build #72911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72911/testReport)**
for PR 16818 at commit
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r101199851
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100926134
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -376,8 +386,15 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100899895
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100900763
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100899694
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArraySuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r101150812
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100925208
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/window/WindowExec.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +283,9 @@ case class WindowExec(
val
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100807225
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/window/WindowExec.scala
---
@@ -310,10 +311,15 @@ case class WindowExec(
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100818273
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100899498
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r101150862
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/window/RowBuffer.scala
---
@@ -17,99 +17,33 @@
package
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r101150777
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -97,6 +98,11 @@ case class SortMergeJoinExec(
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100899601
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/window/WindowExec.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +283,9 @@ case class WindowExec(
val
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100821291
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user tejasapatil commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909#discussion_r100818119
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExternalAppendOnlyUnsafeRowArray.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16920
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16920
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72910/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16920
**[Test build #72910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72910/testReport)**
for PR 16920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
**[Test build #72918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72918/testReport)**
for PR 16909 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r101199261
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -58,49 +58,52 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16934
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16934
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72909/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16934
**[Test build #72909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72909/testReport)**
for PR 16934 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16918
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16918
LGTM. merging now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #72917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72917/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72916/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #72916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72916/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #72916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72916/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16907
**[Test build #72915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72915/testReport)**
for PR 16907 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
**[Test build #72914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72914/testReport)**
for PR 16674 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72913/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
@squito
Thanks a lot. I've refined the comment, please take another look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16932
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16932
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72898/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16932
**[Test build #72898 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72898/testReport)**
for PR 16932 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72912/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16146
ping @cloud-fan , will this pr be merged into branch-1.6?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16901
@squito
Thanks a lot for your comments. I've refined the comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72903/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #72903 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72903/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
1 - 100 of 613 matches
Mail list logo
