Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80710/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
**[Test build #80710 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80710/testReport)**
for PR 18953 at commit
[`22dbe35`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
Interesting, existing `PullupCorrelatedPredicates` produces unresolved
plan. I'll figure out the reason.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80718/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
**[Test build #80718 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80718/testReport)**
for PR 18956 at commit
[`c99011d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
**[Test build #80717 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80717/testReport)**
for PR 18956 at commit
[`9170ceb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18955
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80713/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953#discussion_r133368809
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcQuerySuite.scala ---
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ class OrcQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18955
**[Test build #80713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80713/testReport)**
for PR 18955 at commit
[`67ac3aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80717/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18955
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953#discussion_r133368613
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcFileFormat.scala ---
@@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.SerializableC
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953#discussion_r133368561
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.spark.sql.sources.DataSourceRegister
---
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-org.apache.spark.sql
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80715/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
**[Test build #80715 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80715/testReport)**
for PR 18956 at commit
[`21d86ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
**[Test build #80721 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80721/testReport)**
for PR 18953 at commit
[`07778ed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/07
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
Rebased to the master since #18640 is merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18958
**[Test build #80720 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80720/testReport)**
for PR 18958 at commit
[`cd0de39`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cd
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18640
Thank you, @gatorsmile !!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18958
cc @cloud-fan @BryanCutler
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18958
[SPARK-21745][SQL] Refactor ColumnVector hierarchy to make ColumnVector
read-only and to introduce MutableColumnVector.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a refacto
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18315
**[Test build #80719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80719/testReport)**
for PR 18315 at commit
[`94e0250`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/94
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18640
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18315
@hhbyyh Would you mind to remove ```WIP``` in the PR title if it's
applicable. I'll take a look soon. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18640
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18315
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17862
cc @WeichenXu123 What do you think about this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18926
The current codes around what this PR changes look not quite clean to me
too and we should clean around this.
But I think this PR itself is quite well-formed with the fix that is valid,
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18640
Thank you so much, @rxin , @cloud-fan , @sameeragarwal , @mridulm , @viirya
!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
**[Test build #80718 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80718/testReport)**
for PR 18956 at commit
[`c99011d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c9
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18926
To be honest, the current codes do not look good to me. Since this does not
make the code worse, I will not revert it back.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956#discussion_r133360995
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538#discussion_r133360674
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/ClusteringEvaluatorSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apach
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18640
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18957
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538#discussion_r133360284
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/ClusteringEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
GitHub user caneGuy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18957
[SPARK-21744][CORE] Add retry logic for new broadcast in BroadcastManager
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When driver submit new stage and there is a bad disk before spa
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
**[Test build #80717 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80717/testReport)**
for PR 18956 at commit
[`9170ceb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/91
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956#discussion_r133360047
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
**[Test build #80715 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80715/testReport)**
for PR 18956 at commit
[`21d86ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18855
**[Test build #80716 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80716/testReport)**
for PR 18855 at commit
[`732073c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/73
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18955#discussion_r133359698
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2658,4 +2658,9 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQ
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18956
[SPARK-21726][SQL] Check for structural integrity of the plan in Optimzer
in test mode.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We have many optimization rules now in `Optimzer`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18492
**[Test build #80714 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80714/testReport)**
for PR 18492 at commit
[`8b8b128`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18955
**[Test build #80713 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80713/testReport)**
for PR 18955 at commit
[`67ac3aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/67
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18955
cc @gengliangwang @sameeragarwal @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18955
[SPARK-21743][SQL] top-most limit should not cause memory leak
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For top-most limit, we will use a special operator to execute it:
`Coll
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18492
**[Test build #80712 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80712/testReport)**
for PR 18492 at commit
[`f7cdad9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18954
**[Test build #80711 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80711/testReport)**
for PR 18954 at commit
[`4b009a9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4b
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18954
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18954
[SPARK-17654] [SQL] Enable creating hive bucketed tables
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
### Semantics:
- If the Hive table is bucketed, then INSERT node expect
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80707/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
**[Test build #80707 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80707/testReport)**
for PR 18953 at commit
[`051ed1f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18492#discussion_r133355548
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListener.scala ---
@@ -291,6 +297,16 @@ private[spark] trait SparkListenerInterface {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
**[Test build #80710 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80710/testReport)**
for PR 18953 at commit
[`22dbe35`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/22
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18896
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80708/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18896
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18896
**[Test build #80708 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80708/testReport)**
for PR 18896 at commit
[`2eda876`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18951
LGTM
cc @cloud-fan @jiangxb1987 @wangyum @debugger87 @jerryshao
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18640
Hi, @cloud-fan , @rxin , @sameeragarwal and @mridulm .
Could you merge this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18949
@viirya aha, ok. thanks. (btw, since the comment is still important, we
better keep it in code comment, maybe).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16763
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16763
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80709/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16763
**[Test build #80709 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80709/testReport)**
for PR 16763 at commit
[`1742c15`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18949
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18949
@maropu There is another reason we leave the workaround in place:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11524#issuecomment-192409933
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18902
@hhbyyh I rewrite the impl, and now all `NaN` and `missingValue` will be
transform to `null` at first, then current methods are used.
For columns only containing `null`, `null` is returned
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16763
**[Test build #80709 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80709/testReport)**
for PR 16763 at commit
[`1742c15`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/17
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16763
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18798
Merged into master, thanks for all.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18896
**[Test build #80708 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80708/testReport)**
for PR 18896 at commit
[`2eda876`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2e
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18930#discussion_r133347400
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -2034,4 +2034,25 @@ class JsonSuite extends QueryTe
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18926
Merged to master.
Please open JIRAs / PRs related with the discussion above if anyone is
willing to proceed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18926
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18926
I am merging this as it looks there is an explicit objection for the
current change itself and it looks the issue is fixed by this.
To summarize the discussion here:
- Cleaning
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18950#discussion_r133344532
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -602,6 +604,21 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80703/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810
**[Test build #80703 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80703/testReport)**
for PR 18810 at commit
[`44ce894`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
**[Test build #80707 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80707/testReport)**
for PR 18953 at commit
[`051ed1f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/05
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18953
[SPARK-20682][SQL] Implement new ORC data source based on Apache ORC
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since #17924, #17943, and #17980 are a little large PRs, this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80706/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646
**[Test build #80706 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80706/testReport)**
for PR 12646 at commit
[`5e155bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18887
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80701/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18887
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18887
**[Test build #80701 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80701/testReport)**
for PR 18887 at commit
[`519dab0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18896
LGTM except for making the test's title more descriptive. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18488
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80700/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18488
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18488
**[Test build #80700 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/80700/testReport)**
for PR 18488 at commit
[`fbdc599`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
info] Main Scala API documentation successful.
[error] (spark/javaunidoc:doc) javadoc returned nonzero exit code
[error] Total time: 95 s, completed Aug 15, 2017 4:59:59 PM
[error] ru
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18923#discussion_r15831
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/console.scala
---
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ class ConsoleSink(options: Map[String, Strin
1 - 100 of 486 matches
Mail list logo
