Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19083
LGTM except one comment
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19083#discussion_r141998362
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1074,13 +1078,30 @@ object CodeGenerator
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19290
Ah, thank you @shaneknapp. The command below:
```
Rscript -e "devtools::install_github('jimhester/lintr@5431140')"
```
should upgrades `lintr` to the desired version
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19392#discussion_r141998045
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -510,11 +510,15 @@ rowFormat
;
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
ok, thanks!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
These modified test cases are not following the standards. Impala added
extra (partition) predicates. The perf results are misleading.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19380
This itself is certainly not a bug. The type is on purpose and certainly
the answer is correct given the type. You are arguing for a new function called
something else but you can also do this with
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19380
Currently, we are following Hive for these built-in functions. See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+UDF
Maybe we can wait and see whether more users have
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19083
@gatorsmile if you get time, could you check this? Thanks.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
btw, could we also add add `tpcds-modifiedQueries` here?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82341/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
**[Test build #82341 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82341/testReport)**
for PR 19344 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327
**[Test build #82342 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82342/testReport)**
for PR 19327 at commit
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19396
IMO I think it might be better to throw an exception instead of shifting to
another shuffle. Since user want to use external shuffle explicitly, letting
user to know the issues and fix the issue
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19399
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user caneGuy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19399
[SPARK-22175][WEB-UI] Add status column to history page
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the history page has no status column which represent the status
of
Github user zuotingbing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19398
Got it, thanks all.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user zuotingbing closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19398
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user zuotingbing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19398
Do you know what is the reason to choice to manually create? What about
changing it to create it automatically? Thanks.
---
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19398
See bug update. Please close this PR.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
LGTM pending Jenkins
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19117
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19117
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19370
what is this python console scripts idea, @jsnowacki ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19393
cc @rxin @JoshRosen @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19395#discussion_r141995486
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19395
The Hive might be too old
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19398
AFAIK, this is a by-design choice to manually create event log directory.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19398
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user zuotingbing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19398
[SPARK-22174][CORE]Support to automatically create the directory where the
event logs go (`spark.eventLog.dir`)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`2017-09-30
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19117
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82337/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19117
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19117
**[Test build #82337 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82337/testReport)**
for PR 19117 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19394
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19394
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82338/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19394
**[Test build #82338 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82338/testReport)**
for PR 19394 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19397
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user guoxiaolongzte opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19397
[SPARK-22173] Table CSS style needs to be adjusted in History Page and in
Executors Page.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is a problem with table CSS
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19395
Just curious about how would this happen? Is it due to a data corruption in
database?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19395#discussion_r141994085
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
**[Test build #82341 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82341/testReport)**
for PR 19344 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19396
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user devaraj-kavali opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19396
[SPARK-22172][CORE] Worker hangs when the external shuffle service port is
already in use
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Handling the NonFatal exceptions while
Github user httfighter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19380
I understand everyone's worries.But i hava few thoughts.
Firstly, the native unix_timestamp itself supports the "-MM-dd
HH:mm:ss.SSS" form of the date, but the result is lost in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19383
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82333/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19383
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19383
**[Test build #82333 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82333/testReport)**
for PR 19383 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
**[Test build #82340 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82340/testReport)**
for PR 19344 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82340/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19393
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82334/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19393
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19393
**[Test build #82334 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82334/testReport)**
for PR 19393 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19395
**[Test build #82339 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82339/testReport)**
for PR 19395 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344
**[Test build #82340 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82340/testReport)**
for PR 19344 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19395
[SPARK-22171] [SQL] Describe Table Extended Failed when Table Owner is Empty
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Users could hit `java.lang.NullPointerException` when
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19395
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19395
**[Test build #82339 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82339/testReport)**
for PR 19395 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19395
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82339/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19344#discussion_r141990530
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/benchmark/TPCDSQueryBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -66,24 +64,11 @@ object TPCDSQueryBenchmark
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19394
Ideally, this would also use a TaskMemoryManager so the driver can spill
results to disk instead of dying with an OOM. Is there any plan to add a memory
manager for the driver?
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19394
**[Test build #82338 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82338/testReport)**
for PR 19394 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141989504
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamingSymmetricHashJoinHelper.scala
---
@@ -133,242 +134,6 @@ object
GitHub user rdblue opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19394
SPARK-22170: Reduce memory consumption in broadcast joins.
This updates the broadcast join code path to lazily decompress pages and
iterate through UnsafeRows to prevent all rows from being held
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141987778
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamingSymmetricHashJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -207,31 +221,108 @@ case class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141987664
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamingSymmetricHashJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -207,31 +221,108 @@ case class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141986897
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamingSymmetricHashJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -207,31 +221,108 @@ case class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141986865
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamingSymmetricHashJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -207,31 +221,108 @@ case class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141986696
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationsSuite.scala
---
@@ -413,36 +414,103 @@ class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141986708
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationsSuite.scala
---
@@ -413,36 +414,103 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19309
Will review it this weekend.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141986634
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationsSuite.scala
---
@@ -413,36 +414,103 @@ class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141986168
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationsSuite.scala
---
@@ -413,36 +414,103 @@ class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141986227
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationsSuite.scala
---
@@ -413,36 +414,103 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19117
**[Test build #82337 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82337/testReport)**
for PR 19117 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141985815
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationsSuite.scala
---
@@ -413,36 +414,103 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82331/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
**[Test build #82331 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82331/testReport)**
for PR 19388 at commit
Github user joseph-torres commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141984167
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationsSuite.scala
---
@@ -413,36 +414,103 @@ class
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19270
Thanks, I'll pull the latest changes and keep testing. And thanks for your
quick responses, I understand large changes like this take forever to review
and can get frustrating for the submitter.
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19327#discussion_r141982780
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationChecker.scala
---
@@ -233,16 +234,54 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
**[Test build #82336 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82336/testReport)**
for PR 18732 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82336/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
**[Test build #82336 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82336/testReport)**
for PR 18732 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19229#discussion_r141976671
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2102,6 +2102,55 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19380
The workaround is to let users write a UDF to handle these cases
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82335/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
**[Test build #82335 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82335/testReport)**
for PR 18732 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732#discussion_r141976177
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/group.py ---
@@ -194,6 +194,28 @@ def pivot(self, pivot_col, values=None):
jgd = self._jgd.pivot(pivot_col,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
**[Test build #82335 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82335/testReport)**
for PR 18732 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19393
**[Test build #82334 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82334/testReport)**
for PR 19393 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19388
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/82325/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19383#discussion_r141960405
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/AppStatusListener.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,535 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
1 - 100 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
