Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94779/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
**[Test build #94779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94779/testReport)**
for PR 22009 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
**[Test build #94786 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94786/testReport)**
for PR 20226 at commit
Github user yanlin-Lynn closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20529
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user yanlin-Lynn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20529
No Need any more, close this patch.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94785/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
**[Test build #94785 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94785/testReport)**
for PR 21889 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user ajacques commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889#discussion_r210170646
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaPruningSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+/*
+
Github user rednaxelafx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22103#discussion_r210169785
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1385,9 +1386,15 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
**[Test build #94785 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94785/testReport)**
for PR 21889 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22031
@techaddict Thanks! I look forward to the update.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22031
Hi @ueshin I will update the PR tommorow
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22031
Hi @techaddict,
Do you have time to continue working on this?
If you don't have enough time, I can take this over, so please let me know.
Thanks!
---
Github user deshanxiao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22093
@xuanyuanking I think it carefully later. You are right. The UT just need
to guarantee the KryoSerializer right not all. I will add it in
`KryoSerializerSuite`. Should I delete current UT from
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22099
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94776/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22099
**[Test build #94776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94776/testReport)**
for PR 22099 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210164955
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,60 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165194
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HigherOrderFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -95,6 +95,12 @@ class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165373
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HigherOrderFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -283,6 +289,61 @@ class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165543
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/higher-order-functions.sql ---
@@ -51,3 +51,17 @@ select exists(ys, y -> y > 30) as v from nested;
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210164879
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,60 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210164976
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,60 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165225
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HigherOrderFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -283,6 +289,61 @@ class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165102
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,60 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165448
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,210 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21661
**[Test build #94784 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94784/testReport)**
for PR 21661 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21661
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21661
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94781/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
**[Test build #94781 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94781/testReport)**
for PR 21561 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21661
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
**[Test build #94783 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94783/testReport)**
for PR 22045 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94783/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
**[Test build #94783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94783/testReport)**
for PR 22045 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210165079
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,65 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
ok to test.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94780/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
**[Test build #94780 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94780/testReport)**
for PR 17086 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
Btw, we need one more right parenthesis after the second `array(1, 2, 3)`
and a space at `(k,v)` in the description?
---
-
To
Github user deshanxiao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
please help me cc @HyukjinKwon
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210161746
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,97 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210161509
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,97 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210162791
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HigherOrderFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -283,6 +289,75 @@ class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210161936
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,97 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210162501
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/higher-order-functions.sql ---
@@ -51,3 +51,17 @@ select exists(ys, y -> y > 30) as v from nested;
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210161616
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,97 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210163358
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,97 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210160909
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,65 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210159871
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,65 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210160419
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,65 @@ case class
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210160577
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,65 @@ case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21123
@gatorsmile Yea, it shouldn't break the compatibility for now for the
reasons described in the PR I guess.
@rdblue, however, strictly isn't that specific to Datasource V2, or did I
Github user deshanxiao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22093
@xuanyuanking Thanks for your suggestion. We could indeed test whether
`TaskCommitMessage` can be serialized by `KryoSerializer`. But We could not
explain why the framework must serialize
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94775/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
**[Test build #94775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94775/testReport)**
for PR 22013 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104
> we can implement a dummy data source v1/v2 at scala side
There's an example https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21007 that
implement something in Scala and use it in Python side
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21698
> ... assume that computation is idempotent - we do not support non
determinism in computation
Ah this is a reasonable restriction, we should document it in the RDD
classdoc. How about
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94773/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
**[Test build #94773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94773/testReport)**
for PR 21306 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user deshanxiao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
[SPARK-25120][CORE][HistoryServer]Fix the problem of EventLogListener may
miss driver SparkListenerBlocâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Sometimes in spark
Github user sprintcheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17461
May I know when this change being included into official release, I
download spark 2.3.1 and still do NOT find this method(lda.setInitialModel) has
been added.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
**[Test build #94782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94782/testReport)**
for PR 21537 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
**[Test build #94781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94781/testReport)**
for PR 21561 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22024
retest this please.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
Thanks @HyukjinKwon
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561#discussion_r210158840
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ class KMeans private (
val bcCenters
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21860#discussion_r210158345
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegenSuite.scala
---
@@ -232,6 +232,25 @@ class WholeStageCodegenSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21860#discussion_r210157862
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -853,33 +853,42 @@ case class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22107
Seems fine.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104
@icexelloss we can implement a dummy data source v1/v2 at scala side and
scan them in PySpark test.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22107#discussion_r210157418
--- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2482,6 +2482,32 @@ test_that("union(), unionByName(), rbind(),
except(), and intersect() on a
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22107#discussion_r210157193
--- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2482,6 +2482,32 @@ test_that("union(), unionByName(), rbind(),
except(), and intersect() on a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
**[Test build #94780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94780/testReport)**
for PR 17086 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22107#discussion_r210156892
--- Diff: R/pkg/tests/fulltests/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2482,6 +2482,32 @@ test_that("union(), unionByName(), rbind(),
except(), and intersect() on a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
@WeichenXu123, is it good to go?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22098
Ah, @shaneknapp, probably one possibility about the motivation is that we
don't touch build configuration often and control the build time within the
codebase so that committers don't have to
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21931
@kiszk , @cloud-fan
I was on vacation some time ago, I'm sorry to delayed reply.
I have update it, Can you help to review it again if your have some times.
thanks.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
**[Test build #94779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94779/testReport)**
for PR 22009 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
1 - 100 of 609 matches
Mail list logo
