AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints
should be inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-585076026
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints
should be inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-585076034
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
beliefer commented on issue #27508: [SPARK-30763][SQL] Fix
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException No group 1 for regexp_extract
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27508#issuecomment-585076281
@maropu @cloud-fan @dongjoon-hyun Thanks for all your work.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints should
be inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-585076026
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints should
be inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-585076034
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints
should be inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-584996582
**[Test build #118273 has
SparkQA commented on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints should be
inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-585075027
**[Test build #118273 has
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep
the description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that in
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585071348
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep
the description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that in
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585071360
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that in
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585071360
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that in
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585067812
**[Test build #118282 has
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that in
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585071348
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
SparkQA commented on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that in
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585071256
**[Test build #118282 has
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27511: [SPARK-30765][SQL] Refine base
operator abstraction code style
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27511#issuecomment-585069956
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
This
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27511: [SPARK-30765][SQL] Refine base
operator abstraction code style
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27511#issuecomment-585069964
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27511: [SPARK-30765][SQL] Refine base
operator abstraction code style
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27511#issuecomment-585069956
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
This is an
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27511: [SPARK-30765][SQL] Refine base
operator abstraction code style
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27511#issuecomment-585069964
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #27511: [SPARK-30765][SQL] Refine base
operator abstraction code style
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27511#issuecomment-584993352
**[Test build #118272 has
SparkQA commented on issue #27511: [SPARK-30765][SQL] Refine base operator
abstraction code style
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27511#issuecomment-585069339
**[Test build #118272 has
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep
the description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585068248
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep
the description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585068244
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585068244
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585068248
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep
the description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585059839
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
SparkQA commented on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585067812
**[Test build #118282 has
HyukjinKwon commented on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585067287
ok to test
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27537:
[WIP][SPARK-30668][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Raise exception instead of silent change for
new TimestampFormatter
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27537#issuecomment-585064900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27537:
[WIP][SPARK-30668][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Raise exception instead of silent change for
new TimestampFormatter
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27537#issuecomment-585064905
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27537: [WIP][SPARK-30668][SQL][FOLLOWUP]
Raise exception instead of silent change for new TimestampFormatter
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27537#issuecomment-585064900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27537: [WIP][SPARK-30668][SQL][FOLLOWUP]
Raise exception instead of silent change for new TimestampFormatter
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27537#issuecomment-585064905
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #27537: [WIP][SPARK-30668][SQL][FOLLOWUP]
Raise exception instead of silent change for new TimestampFormatter
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27537#issuecomment-584984590
**[Test build #118271 has
SparkQA commented on issue #27537: [WIP][SPARK-30668][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Raise
exception instead of silent change for new TimestampFormatter
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27537#issuecomment-585064202
**[Test build #118271 has
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27539: [SPARK-30786] [CORE] Fix Block
replication failure propogation issue in BlockManager
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27539#issuecomment-585062950
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27539: [SPARK-30786] [CORE] Fix Block
replication failure propogation issue in BlockManager
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27539#issuecomment-585062956
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27539: [SPARK-30786] [CORE] Fix Block
replication failure propogation issue in BlockManager
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27539#issuecomment-585062956
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27539: [SPARK-30786] [CORE] Fix Block
replication failure propogation issue in BlockManager
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27539#issuecomment-585062950
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
SparkQA commented on issue #27539: [SPARK-30786] [CORE] Fix Block replication
failure propogation issue in BlockManager
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27539#issuecomment-585062627
**[Test build #118281 has
HyukjinKwon commented on issue #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL codegen's
code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544#issuecomment-585060347
Merged to branch-3.0 too.
HyukjinKwon commented on issue #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL codegen's
code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544#issuecomment-585060303
Okay, this conflict was actually by mine
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep
the description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585059449
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585059839
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
HyukjinKwon commented on issue #27531: Revert "[SPARK-30625][SQL] Support
`escape` as third parameter of the `like` function
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27531#issuecomment-585059636
Actually that conflict is by me https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27514.
Let me handle it.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545#issuecomment-585059449
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
HyukjinKwon commented on issue #27514: Revert "[SPARK-30245][SQL] Add cache for
Like and RLike when pattern is not static"
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27514#issuecomment-585059518
and merged to branch-3.0.
This
turboFei opened a new pull request #27545: [SPARK-29542][FOLLOW-UP] Keep the
description of spark.sql.files.* in tuning guide be consistent with that of
SQLConf.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27545
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27488:
[SPARK-26580][SQL][ML][FOLLOW-UP] Throw exception when use untyped UDF by
default
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27488#issuecomment-585057793
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27488: [SPARK-26580][SQL][ML][FOLLOW-UP]
Throw exception when use untyped UDF by default
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27488#issuecomment-585057793
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27488:
[SPARK-26580][SQL][ML][FOLLOW-UP] Throw exception when use untyped UDF by
default
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27488#issuecomment-585057784
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27488: [SPARK-26580][SQL][ML][FOLLOW-UP]
Throw exception when use untyped UDF by default
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27488#issuecomment-585057784
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
SparkQA commented on issue #27488: [SPARK-26580][SQL][ML][FOLLOW-UP] Throw
exception when use untyped UDF by default
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27488#issuecomment-585057476
**[Test build #118280 has
cloud-fan closed pull request #27508: [SPARK-30763][SQL] Fix
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException No group 1 for regexp_extract
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27508
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
cloud-fan edited a comment on issue #27508: [SPARK-30763][SQL] Fix
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException No group 1 for regexp_extract
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27508#issuecomment-585056962
thanks, merging to master/3.0?
cloud-fan edited a comment on issue #27508: [SPARK-30763][SQL] Fix
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException No group 1 for regexp_extract
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27508#issuecomment-585056962
thanks, merging to master/3.0!
cloud-fan commented on issue #27508: [SPARK-30763][SQL] Fix
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException No group 1 for regexp_extract
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27508#issuecomment-585056962
thanks, merging to master!
Ngone51 commented on issue #27488: [SPARK-26580][SQL][ML][FOLLOW-UP] Throw
exception when use untyped UDF by default
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27488#issuecomment-585056470
retest this please.
This is an
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints
should be inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-585053389
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27481: [SPARK-30758][SQL][TESTS]
Improve bracketed comments tests.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27481#issuecomment-585053387
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27481: [SPARK-30758][SQL][TESTS] Improve
bracketed comments tests.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27481#issuecomment-585053372
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
This is an
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27481: [SPARK-30758][SQL][TESTS]
Improve bracketed comments tests.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27481#issuecomment-585053372
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
This is
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints
should be inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-585053377
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints should
be inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-585053377
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints should
be inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-585053389
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27481: [SPARK-30758][SQL][TESTS] Improve
bracketed comments tests.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27481#issuecomment-585053387
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints
should be inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-584978572
**[Test build #118270 has
SparkQA commented on issue #27252: [SPARK-29231][SQL] Constraints should be
inferred from cast equality constraint
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27252#issuecomment-585052859
**[Test build #118270 has
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #27481: [SPARK-30758][SQL][TESTS] Improve
bracketed comments tests.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27481#issuecomment-584971977
**[Test build #118269 has
SparkQA commented on issue #27481: [SPARK-30758][SQL][TESTS] Improve bracketed
comments tests.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27481#issuecomment-585052803
**[Test build #118269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/118269/testReport)**
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #27532: [SPARK-30782][SQL]
Column resolution doesn't respect current catalog/namespace for v2 tables.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27532#discussion_r378060149
##
File path:
rednaxelafx commented on issue #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL codegen's
code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544#issuecomment-585051287
Thank you all for your reviews! I'll open a backport PR for
HyukjinKwon closed pull request #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL codegen's
code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544
This is an automated
HyukjinKwon commented on issue #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL codegen's
code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544#issuecomment-585049199
Merged to master.
@rednaxelafx, mind opening a backport PR for
iRakson commented on issue #27542: [SPARK-30790]The dataType of map() should be
map
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27542#issuecomment-585048687
> how about a single config
`spark.sql.legacy.createEmptyCollectionUsingStringType`?
Seems fine to me. I will update code.
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL codegen's
code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544#issuecomment-585048125
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL
codegen's code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's
StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544#issuecomment-585048125
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL codegen's
code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544#issuecomment-585048112
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL
codegen's code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's
StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544#issuecomment-585048112
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
cloud-fan commented on issue #27542: [SPARK-30790]The dataType of map() should
be map
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27542#issuecomment-585047698
how about a single config
`spark.sql.legacy.createEmptyCollectionUsingStringType`?
SparkQA commented on issue #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL codegen's
code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544#issuecomment-585047583
**[Test build #118267 has
SparkQA removed a comment on issue #27544: [SPARK-30795][SQL] Spark SQL
codegen's code() interpolator should treat escapes like Scala's
StringContext.s()
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27544#issuecomment-584969459
**[Test build #118267 has
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #27542: [SPARK-30790]The
dataType of map() should be map
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27542#discussion_r378055780
##
File path:
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #27478: [SPARK-25829][SQL] Add
config `spark.sql.deduplicateMapKey.lastWinsPolicy.enabled` and change the
default behavior
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27478#discussion_r378054659
##
File path:
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #27517: [WIP][SPARK-29721][SQL] Prune
unnecessary nested fields from Generate without Project
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27517#issuecomment-585045132
Got it. Thank you for updating.
yhuai commented on issue #27536: [SPARK-30784] Use ORC nohive
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27536#issuecomment-585043898
taking
SparkQA commented on issue #27536: [SPARK-30784] Use ORC nohive
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27536#issuecomment-585043463
**[Test build #118279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/118279/testReport)**
for PR 27536 at commit
dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #24902: [SPARK-28093][SQL] Fix
TRIM/LTRIM/RTRIM function parameter order issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24902#issuecomment-585042944
Yes. I'm not against for your decision. What I'm asking is that let's do
this in a public manner if
dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #24902: [SPARK-28093][SQL] Fix
TRIM/LTRIM/RTRIM function parameter order issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24902#issuecomment-585042944
Yes. I'm not against for your decision. What I'm asking is that let's do
this in a public manner if
dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #24902: [SPARK-28093][SQL] Fix
TRIM/LTRIM/RTRIM function parameter order issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24902#issuecomment-585042944
Yes. I'm not against for your decision. What I'm asking is that let's do
this in a public manner if
dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #24902: [SPARK-28093][SQL] Fix
TRIM/LTRIM/RTRIM function parameter order issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24902#issuecomment-585042944
Yes. I'm not against for your decision. What I'm asking is that let's do
this in a public manner if
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #24902: [SPARK-28093][SQL] Fix
TRIM/LTRIM/RTRIM function parameter order issue
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24902#issuecomment-585042944
Yes. I'm not against for your decision. What I'm asking is that let's do
this in a public manner if we
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27536: [SPARK-30784] Use ORC nohive
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27536#issuecomment-585041918
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
This is an automated message from the
yhuai commented on issue #27536: [SPARK-30784] Use ORC nohive
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27536#issuecomment-585042303
Also, the error cause was
```
Caused by: sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #27536: [SPARK-30784] Use ORC nohive
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27536#issuecomment-585041924
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
iRakson commented on a change in pull request #27542: [SPARK-30790]The dataType
of map() should be map
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27542#discussion_r378051609
##
File path:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27536: [SPARK-30784] Use ORC nohive
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27536#issuecomment-585041918
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
This is an automated message from the Apache
AmplabJenkins commented on issue #27536: [SPARK-30784] Use ORC nohive
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27536#issuecomment-585041924
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
yhuai commented on issue #27536: [SPARK-30784] Use ORC nohive
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27536#issuecomment-585041496
hmm. We need to keep hive-storage-api. But I will need to check why we hit
the runtime exception. Somehow we used hive-storage-api's VectorizedRowBatch
iRakson removed a comment on issue #27542: [SPARK-30790]The dataType of map()
should be map
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27542#issuecomment-585038840
Test cases are failing because key of a map can't be of NullType. @cloud-fan
gengliangwang edited a comment on issue #27478: [SPARK-25829][SQL] Add config
`spark.sql.deduplicateMapKey.lastWinsPolicy.enabled` and change the default
behavior
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27478#issuecomment-585039004
I google searched "deduplicate map key" and there is no
HeartSaVioR commented on a change in pull request #25670: [SPARK-28869][CORE]
Roll over event log files
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25670#discussion_r378049590
##
File path: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala
##
@@ -179,6
gengliangwang edited a comment on issue #27478: [SPARK-25829][SQL] Add config
`spark.sql.deduplicateMapKey.lastWinsPolicy.enabled` and change the default
behavior
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27478#issuecomment-585039004
I searched "deduplicate map key" and there is no
1 - 100 of 981 matches
Mail list logo
