[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-19 Thread rxin
Github user rxin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Merging in master/branch-2.1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-18 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-18 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68855/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-18 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68855 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68855/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-18 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68855 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68855/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68821/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68821 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68821/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68820/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68820 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68820/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68819/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68819 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68819/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68821 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68821/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68820 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68820/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68819 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68819/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread ericl
Github user ericl commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Looks good --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68798/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68798 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68798/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68798 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68798/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68793/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68793 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68793/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-17 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 **[Test build #68793 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68793/consoleFull)** for PR 15907 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-16 Thread kiszk
Github user kiszk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 It would be good. In that case, is it better to insert explicit cast (from int to long) if a caller gives an int variable? This is why we want to explicitly express a specification of public

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-16 Thread rxin
Github user rxin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 I'm thinking 2. What do you think? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-16 Thread kiszk
Github user kiszk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Ideally, it is a good idea. Do you want to do that change using this PR? Another question is which scope do we apply such a change? (1) Only in methods that I applied changes to. (2)

[GitHub] spark issue #15907: [SPARK-18458][CORE] Fix signed integer overflow problem ...

2016-11-16 Thread rxin
Github user rxin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15907 Yea it might be a good idea to just use longs. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this